OPINION

Discovery Zone: Darwin's Law for Kids

Written by Chelsea Smith
Published June 19, 2006

Every year in America, an average of 7.2 million children are born. In 1985, the year I was born, I was just one of 6,438,239 fertilized embryos. Of those six million plus, there are currently 5,166,952 of us. So what happened to the missing 1,271,287 that knocked off between 1985 and 2006?*

Two words, my friends: Discovery Zone.

Don't be fooled.
These are the gates of hell.
Some children had Chuck E. Cheese (or Showbiz Pizza, for you old schoolers). Some children had the local playground. Some had Parcheesi. But for many of us, particularly in the greater Fort Wayne, Indiana area that I grew up in, there was Discovery Zone, which, according to Wikipedia, can best be described as having been “a chain of entertainment facilities featuring games, elaborate indoor mazes designed for young children, including slides, climbing play structures and ball pits.”

But for laymen, Discovery Zone was more accurately, Darwin’s Law for Kids.

A fun-filled afternoon for the family!

Ask the scarred, crippled 20-somethings of today about it and many will shudder in terror at the simple memory of the horrors of Discovery Zone. It was impossible to leave the large building of tubes, ball pits, slides, and arcade games without some form of head and/or internal injury.

My brother has a considerable crook in his nose that I can’t help but credit to the time I kicked him in the face somewhere within the tubes.

Within the tubes, the social hierarchy was similar to Lord of the Flies. It wasn’t uncommon to find corpses littering the tubes. And naturally, if you were an especially agile child, you could move through the tubes with considerable ease -- until you came up behind the notorious Fat Kid who never moved at the speed you wanted him to, especially in a rousing game of tag, at which point you would either A) trample him, B) maneuver around him and then kick him in the face, or C) push him to speed him up until he kicked you in the face.

Children can climb through the tubes with relative ease, but parents could not, which was especially to my 11-year-old advantage when it was time to go home and I knew damn well my 6'8" father couldn’t possibly come in after us. I was lucky, though. Usually you’d see one or two especially irate and lost parents screaming for their children and these children could usually be identified as the ones pushing/trampling Fat Kid out of the way. Or, there was a worse fate…

The ball pit.

Missing since 1994.

To this day, I still remember the feel of young, nimble, rigamortic bodies under my feet in the ball pit. There was always that special breed of children who didn’t really like to play and instead thought it a good plan to lounge in the ball pit. (Often this was Fat Kid, crying after having his nose broken for the fifth time that day.)

page 1 | 2
Chelsea Smith is a freelance writer unfortunately stuck in Indiana, with a deep and tragic longing for her home state of Ohio. She is an alumna of Purdue University and holds dual degrees in journalism and anthropology. Her parents' neighbors think she is a nice girl, and would gladly let her water their plants.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Buy from Amazon.com
The Darwin Awards III The Darwin Awards III
Wendy Northcutt
Book,

Discovery Zone: Darwin's Law for Kids
Published: June 19, 2006
Type: Opinion
Section: Culture
Filed Under: Culture: Family and Relationships, Culture: Humor and Satire, Culture: Personal History, Culture: Society
Writer: Chelsea Smith
Chelsea Smith's BC Writer page
Chelsea Smith's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Chelsea Smith
Culture: Family and Relationships
Culture: Humor and Satire
Culture: Personal History
Culture: Society
All Culture Articles
All Opinion articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — June 19, 2006 @ 23:16PM — Matthew T. Sussman [URL]

And lo, it began: Chelsea's fascination with balls.

#2 — June 20, 2006 @ 04:06AM — Al Barger [URL]

Chelsea, what the hell is wrong with you, anyway? With this ruthless display of the Will to Power, I bet Hillary would say that you're more heartless than even Ann Coulter, the evil one herself.

#3 — June 20, 2006 @ 20:01PM — Matthew T. Sussman [URL]

Barger, you got it all wrong. Her heart is in the right place -- it's her soul is curiously absent.

#4 — June 22, 2006 @ 01:40AM — Al Barger [URL]

So Chelsea doesn't have a soul. Does she cast a reflection in mirrors, or is it like with vampires?

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/49423)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments