<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on CD Review: Peeping Tom - &lt;em&gt;Peeping Tom&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2006 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 3 Oct 2006 06:43:08 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by A.L. Harper on CD Review: Peeping Tom - &lt;em&gt;Peeping Tom&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/06/02/020353.php#comment-450425</link>
<description>Ben - No worries you were the least offensive.

Brian - I was never a fan of his other work with the exception of Faith No More.  And I agree with you about listening to Peeping Tom over most of the shite they play on the radio today.  I standards of pop music today are appalling!

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">450425@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 Oct 2006 06:43:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Brian aka Guppusmaximus on CD Review: Peeping Tom - &lt;em&gt;Peeping Tom&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/06/02/020353.php#comment-450301</link>
<description>Chiming In...

&quot;he has done much better things in his career, albeit, most of his recent works are quite bad to say the least... &quot;

Sorry, but the last Fantomas &amp; Tomahawk CDs were f*cking great. I admit that I can&#039;t really listen to Peeping Tom because I don&#039;t like hip-hop but I would rather have to listen to this on the radio than 99% of the sh!t that they play all day long!! F*ck, I&#039;d rather listen to &quot;Adult Themes for Voice&quot; than all the sh!t they play on TV and the Radio...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">450301@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Oct 2006 20:49:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Ben Cleuch on CD Review: Peeping Tom - &lt;em&gt;Peeping Tom&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/06/02/020353.php#comment-450191</link>
<description>A.L.: If I have been mysogynistic I am sorry. We were just pissing-about trying to wind each other up.

Fem_D: You say &quot;&lt;i&gt;its (sic) no secret that women like linear, dense music&lt;/i&gt;&quot;.  That is not something I have ever heard before.  Can you back up your claim with a few links [Edited]?

...and yes, I do &quot;&lt;i&gt;still want to make childish and bitchy remarks&lt;/i&gt;&quot; because you stupidly rise to the bait every time.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">450191@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Oct 2006 16:51:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by A.L. Harper on CD Review: Peeping Tom - &lt;em&gt;Peeping Tom&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/06/02/020353.php#comment-449981</link>
<description>&lt;em&gt;&quot;i could assume that my pal benny cleuth, is actually, a.l harper. theres no way for me to prove it, but im damn sure im right. it must be my cancerian intuition&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

I wouldn&#039;t rely to much on your woeful and inaccurate powers of intuition.  I would not take on the guise of a man I can defend myself when needs be, they just don&#039;t in this instance.  I can tell that you are really 14 -- no one but a 14-year-old would use the word &quot;cuz&quot; (well, either that or someone with an IQ of 14) -- and I have not the time, energy nor inclination to argue with you.  You&#039;re just not interesting or challenging enough to be bothered with.

Besides as my grandmother always said &quot;Never teach a pig to sing.  It wastes your time and annoys the pig.&quot;  And I&#039;m old enough to know a pig when I smell one.

But please you and Benny continue, I&#039;m waiting to see if you have learned the art of structured argument. But so far, as you have had to rely on misogynistic insults I would guess the answer is no.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">449981@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Oct 2006 07:18:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by feminist_deepthroater on CD Review: Peeping Tom - &lt;em&gt;Peeping Tom&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/06/02/020353.php#comment-449980</link>
<description>......... its no secret that women like linear, dense music (with good looking vocalists) that consist of beats, easy to shake their asses too. like peeping tom is. no need to take offense, unless the truth offends you. some even say, that the truth hurts. in this case it must be true... 
um, i thought i straightened out your assumptions about my sex life in my previous post, so if you still want to make childish and bitchy remarks without reading what i said, i really dont care. cuz its really not the truth.... now, if were to play the assuming game, i could assume that my pal benny cleuth, is actually, a.l harper. theres no way for me to prove it, but im damn sure im right. it must be my cancerian intuition... oh, and its incredibly sad, and funny that you had to assume the role of a man to convey your bitchy opinion. ps. the low balling about me being bitter and not getting pussy gave you away benny, its a textbook bitch&#039;s resposnse directed to old fashioned guys with strong opinions.... this was good for a chucle. thanks, ben. and really, dont expect a response either, im more content letting you seethe in your anger, knowing that your cover was blown, and that you got dominated. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">449980@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Oct 2006 06:44:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Ben Cleuch on CD Review: Peeping Tom - &lt;em&gt;Peeping Tom&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/06/02/020353.php#comment-449774</link>
<description>WTF are you talking about??

Who mentioned number of sexual conquests?  The fact that you leapt to such an assumption is &lt;i&gt;very&lt;/i&gt; telling.

If &lt;b&gt;everyone&lt;/b&gt; is telling you that you sound like you&#039;re not &#039;getting any&#039;, maybe you should ask yourself why that is.  Is it because you seem bitter, spiteful and aggresive?  You sound like you desperately need to release some of your tension - whether with a woman, a man or your own hand (and please don&#039;t tell us which - nobody is interested).

To get back to the point though; that you don&#039;t agree with A.L.&#039;s review.  A.L. is as entitled to her opinion as you are to yours.  It is great that you want to share your opinion with us, but to make fatuous remarks about a reviewer&#039;s sex is as unhelpful as it is offensive.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">449774@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 1 Oct 2006 13:42:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by feminist_deepthroater on CD Review: Peeping Tom - &lt;em&gt;Peeping Tom&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/06/02/020353.php#comment-449756</link>
<description>lol. thats the response i get from EVERYONE when i speak my mind about things that are still taboo to most morons. that i dont get any, that im bitter, im a misogynist ect.lol, well im no womanizing stallion but i assure you that i get my share....  my getting some doesnt help my &quot;bitterness&quot; though. oh well, i guess the woman isnt the miracle cure she&#039;s cut out to be. what a surprise... 

now what i find funny about you, benny, is that you still measure how cool you are by how many women you get. think about it you dork...its really pathetic, isnt it?..  you&#039;re the fucking joke if you ask me.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">449756@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 1 Oct 2006 12:48:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Ben Cleuch on CD Review: Peeping Tom - &lt;em&gt;Peeping Tom&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/06/02/020353.php#comment-449631</link>
<description>Re feminist_D: My god you sound bitter.  What&#039;s the matter?  Not getting any?  Ever?

Never mind, I&#039;m sure there&#039;s nothing physically wrong with you.  You just need to work on your personality.

So someone doesn&#039;t agree with your puerile opinions of music - big deal (and hardly surprising).  But to turn that into a rant against women - now that is funny!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">449631@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 1 Oct 2006 07:23:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by feminist_deepthroater on CD Review: Peeping Tom - &lt;em&gt;Peeping Tom&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/06/02/020353.php#comment-449618</link>
<description>im arguing about music with a woman?. LOL. shame on me. in my defense, i didnt know... well, now i know why you are so hyped about this new shitty release. its because mr patton is an arrogant prick. a trait that you women LOVE in a man, that plus the music has a beat that you can move your asses to... thats really all women  want in their music. its been proved to me too many times for me to accept any other explanation... well i thought you were a guy, but its totaly okay for women to listen to this crap. afterall its better than fergie&#039;s shit or pink ect. a lot better actually. so i can appreciate it from that angle. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">449618@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 1 Oct 2006 05:42:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by A.L. Harper on CD Review: Peeping Tom - &lt;em&gt;Peeping Tom&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/06/02/020353.php#comment-447664</link>
<description>It is narrow minded.  You are denying him not only his artistic freedom and his choice to move through any genera of music he chooses to but you are also saying that there is no other valid form of music.

I just interviewed him again and you&#039;ll be not so happy to hear that there is another PT coming out next year.  And he is very excited about the continuing Peeping Tom for a while to come.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">447664@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 09:03:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by feminist_deepthroater on CD Review: Peeping Tom - &lt;em&gt;Peeping Tom&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/06/02/020353.php#comment-447663</link>
<description>to prefer peeping tom over faith no more is like blatantly stating that your taste in music is very poor. peeping tom is a failure and i hope that patton comes to his sences and dumps on the whole act. he has done much better things in his career, albeit, most of his recent works are quite bad to say the least... peeping tom is just unacceptably bad in my opinion, and i know that im not the only one who will entirely dump on patton if he continues to release shitty albums of this fashion. 

its not acceptable for someone who started out playing obscure death metal, fusion, and avante garde experimental music to end up rapping to pop like some run of the mill wigger. its not being closeminded, its my lack of appreciacion of someone who sells out. its a good trait to have...now if you&#039;re a person who will blindly follow him because of his past acheivments, no matter how bad he has become today, i feel sorry for you and your frail mind.. the underground music industry is jam packed with underrated bands that take complexity and musicmanship to levels that would have patton bow down to and spitshine their boots with his gimmicky rico-suave pimpin white suit sleeve.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">447663@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 08:57:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by JayC on CD Review: Peeping Tom - &lt;em&gt;Peeping Tom&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/06/02/020353.php#comment-423090</link>
<description>I have to agree that this album does have a bit of a pop undertone, however, I will completely disagree with you Daniel. This is an excellent album and quite out of the ordinary for Mike. To be honest I have to say I almost prefer this album to alot of stuff that Faith No More did. 

I am also interested to hear the kind of stuff that would &quot;Blow&quot; someones mind. And yes, this album does need a bit of an open mind to appreciate because, however simple and basic some of the insturmental are, the lyrics (as usual) are very good (as random and obsqure as they may seem at times.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">423090@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 8 Aug 2006 00:46:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by A.L. Harper on CD Review: Peeping Tom - &lt;em&gt;Peeping Tom&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/06/02/020353.php#comment-416875</link>
<description>Now... now... language child!  What I think you&#039;ll find I said (if you actually read my comment) is that you think Mike Patton sold out because he is no longer conforming to the pigeon hole in which you put him and that is where you are most comfortable with him.  If this is the direction that he wants to take artistically than he has every right to do that.  It doesn&#039;t make him a sell out.  

And as accessible as this album is I doubt you will find any 12 olds listening to it.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">416875@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2006 14:18:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by daniel on CD Review: Peeping Tom - &lt;em&gt;Peeping Tom&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/06/02/020353.php#comment-416867</link>
<description>hey [Edited]. if you think that peeping tom needs an open mind to listen to, i bet your fucking head would explode if you listened to the stuff i listen to. THIS IS POP [Edited]. you dont have to be very open minded to listen to it. thats why 12 year old girls listen to it... every song on this album could be taught to a fucking chimp.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">416867@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2006 14:07:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by A.L. Harper on CD Review: Peeping Tom - &lt;em&gt;Peeping Tom&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/06/02/020353.php#comment-416777</link>
<description>It always amazes me that people call anyone a sell out when they dare attempt to stretch their artistic wings a little bit.  If you know like the music or if it doesn&#039;t conform to your narrow minded ideas of that a particular artist is supposed to be they have suddenly sold out.

I would be willing to bet money that you have never allowed your tiny, narrow ideas to leave the safety of your drug addled mind.  

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">416777@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2006 08:32:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by daniel on CD Review: Peeping Tom - &lt;em&gt;Peeping Tom&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/06/02/020353.php#comment-416771</link>
<description>fuck man... mike patton has become a real fucking loser. what credibility will the new tomahawk or fantomas have after the release of this steaming pile of dog shit? its just sub-par, out-dated pop by a bunch of hipsters... at times it sounds like eminem would have fit into this embarassment of a cd perfectly.. i will never buy this cd and i doubt i will ever buy anything patton related again.

 the guy is a sellout. not a genius.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">416771@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2006 07:32:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by A.L. Harper on CD Review: Peeping Tom - &lt;em&gt;Peeping Tom&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/06/02/020353.php#comment-399255</link>
<description>My mother didn&#039;t.  You&#039;re mother must be much more fun than mine.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">399255@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 17:55:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by mr. T. on CD Review: Peeping Tom - &lt;em&gt;Peeping Tom&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/06/02/020353.php#comment-399248</link>
<description>STYB [Edited] WROTE &quot;May be weird to most people out there&quot;.... whats weird about it?LOL! its fucking pop you tool! i bet my mother would like this record. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">399248@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 17:31:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by adegamisou on CD Review: Peeping Tom - &lt;em&gt;Peeping Tom&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/06/02/020353.php#comment-397294</link>
<description>this album fucking blows cock. this album along with most of the shit he does lately, proved to me that mike pattons good days are long gone....  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">397294@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 07:50:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jeffrae on CD Review: Peeping Tom - &lt;em&gt;Peeping Tom&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/06/02/020353.php#comment-387995</link>
<description>The Getaway PArt in the chorus sounds almost the same..

Great Album though..

Good Job Patten and Co..</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">387995@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 20:19:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by A.L. Harper on CD Review: Peeping Tom - &lt;em&gt;Peeping Tom&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/06/02/020353.php#comment-387438</link>
<description>I think have a slightly similar guitar riff but other than that they don&#039;t sound alike to me.  And I have just spent the last 5 minutes comparing them.

It is a brilliant album!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">387438@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 03:58:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jeffrae on CD Review: Peeping Tom - &lt;em&gt;Peeping Tom&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/06/02/020353.php#comment-387267</link>
<description>My Only beef is that Get Away sounds too much like Fly Away by Lenny Kravitz. I hate lenny.. and The Chorus of this sound has the same sound as fly away....  :(</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">387267@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 21:10:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by A.L. Harper on CD Review: Peeping Tom - &lt;em&gt;Peeping Tom&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/06/02/020353.php#comment-386382</link>
<description>I can see you feel very enthusiastic about this album.  It is very good!  I&#039;m glad you liked it.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">386382@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 15:44:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Styb on CD Review: Peeping Tom - &lt;em&gt;Peeping Tom&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/06/02/020353.php#comment-386290</link>
<description>THIS ALBUM JUST ROCKS! LOVED IT! May be weird to most people out there, but hey he&#039;s got their very own style. Come on, for those who doesn&#039;t like it, don&#039;t brainwash others&#039; mind OK!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">386290@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 14:36:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by A.L. Harper on CD Review: Peeping Tom - &lt;em&gt;Peeping Tom&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/06/02/020353.php#comment-384895</link>
<description>Thanks for the news MBN.  That&#039;s interesting.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">384895@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Jun 2006 03:54:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>