The Hot Topic: A Well-Rounded Education
Published June 01, 2006
So Mondos, what's it gonna be? Does a person waste time (and money) taking on 'outside' topics, or does learning have its own intrinsic worth?
From: Aaron Fleming
To: The Hot Topic Team
Re: A Well-Rounded Education
Let me begin by saying that I agree with Mark's points on this subject. Or maybe that's a bad place to start. Perhaps I should have led up to that. I could have had a systematic rundown of analysis leading to a prophetic conclusion where the yay-saying was in supreme domination. Probably a superior way to initiate this is to provide some context of my own position.
I am, and this is somewhat an all too overt a confession, a student. An undergraduate humanities student to be more precise (well, I could be MORE precise, but I won't bother). I have always assumed a university degree to be pretty mandatory for the old life stuff (it's not, but it helps), less for knowledge matters than just for the sheer outcome of possessing a degree, perceived as necessary for avoiding lifetime employment in a tin factory.
But to return to Mark's point about spreading those learning wings into areas foreign to your chosen subject, disciplines that will undoubtedly have no relevance in your resulting profession, I say yes, expand those wings and fly into that shelf of hardbacks, Saussure's semiotics awaits you, or there's some Dante ready to rattle your head. It's fun to learn so strive for that knowledge; it'll make you a more rounded, cultured, and intelligent individual. Do not fear information; embrace it.
I don't study philosophy, yet I'm interested in it, and therefore I go, seek out, read, and enjoy it. You could make an argument about how reading some of Bertrand Russell's scientific philosophy (for example) is pointless and of no pragmatic relevance to everyday life. Maybe so, but it's still educational and enlightening. However, I wouldn't be one to read just for the sake of it, only that which appeals to me — like a collection of material on hydrology wouldn't tickle my cognitive senses.
So yeah, it's okay to learn for the sake of it. It doesn't have to revolve around some sort of employment. There's more to life than your job. Inflate and flap those wings, indulge in that Max Weber text, or that copy of the Communist Manifesto, and remember, not all winged journeys end up like Icarus. I'm away to read some Feuerbach.
From: Mat Brewster
To: The Hot Topic Team
Re: A Well-Rounded Education
For the duration of time that I've known my wife, some five years, she has been in graduate school. She's on the last semester of a PhD in French Linguistics. She spends her waking hours, and some of her sleeping ones, studying the minute details and history of the French language. It's what you call an extremely specialized degree and it consumes her.
- The Hot Topic: A Well-Rounded Education
- Published: June 01, 2006
- Type: Opinion
- Section: Culture
- Filed Under: Culture: Education, Culture: Personal History, Culture: Society
- Writer: Mark Saleski
- Mark Saleski's BC Writer page
- Mark Saleski's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
well-rounded education doesn't have to come in the form of a college degree
yea, that's very true. i sort of which i'd gone into that a little.
by yes, it's the life-long learning thing that's important too.
What I had planned to write, had I made myself have the time, was that I wish it was easier to take classes a la carte after your degree was completed. When I was in college, I was pretty focused on getting my degree because by that time I was a bit of an older student (long story). Now that I am out, there are scads of things I would love to know more about and would like taking a class to help with that.
I think learning is going to happen no matter where you are - provided you are open to it.
Remember Its A Wonderful Life? Jimmy Stewart was always a bit resentful that he didn't get to travel, and then "Go to college, and see what they know". But as Clarence pointed out to him, he really was having a fine ole time in Bedford Falls after all. His experiences and interactions with others in his small town truly made him 'the richest man in town'.
Of course I think if anyone has the opportunity to get to college, their obligation is to work hard at the required subjects for their major - but at the same time, not have the blinders on so tight they can't absorb the countless experiences that will not occur in the classroom.
i worked hard at the required subjects...i just sucked at it. y'know, despite bennett's objections, i do think that it's an "experience". in retrospect, one that i wish i'd been able to go through when i was just a little older.
Most colleges offer advanced chemistry in a variety of "classroom settings."
I was a little older when I went and felt the pressure to finish. Even though I was only a couple years older than the "kids," I still felt very much like an outsider to the "experience." I think the "college experience" is just a kitchsy phrase used to jack up tuition each year.
I majored in cynicism. I think I got the fuckin' job.
I majored in cynicism. I think I got the fuckin' job
Absolutely! Summa Cum Fuckin'Laude is what you got!
I had to laugh about the college experience being a 'kitchsy phrase'.
Maybe there's some truth to that!
again, it depends on what kind of experience you want.
dj's still bitter because he was ignored by the cheerleaders.
Wish I'd been invited to participate too. I wasn't even aware this project was being launched - the price of there being too damned many things going on at BC for any person with human level powers to fully monitor.
What bothers me is that the focus on a well rounded educaton has been abandonned or greatly minimized by most colleges in favor of greater and greater specialization. When our first colleges were founded everyone took essentially the same curriculum for the entire time they were there. By the start of the 20th century this had shifted to two years of required courses followed by two years of specialized electives. Today at most schools the curriculum is largely determined by your major and there are very few courses required of everyone, and most of those you can place out of. Here in Texas I think the requirements are down to a total of less than 20 hours out of 100+ for a BA.
The ultimate impact of this is that people may be more educated in their area of specialization, but they're ignorant in so many other areas that they're less functional as human beings. I remember that educated people of my parents generation had certain basic cultural and intellectual knowledge which they could use as a basis for conversation. This is true of a smaller group of people in my generation and I suspect that in my childrens generation that common ground of cultural literacy will no longer exist at all.
Hyperspecialization in college wouldn't be as bad if the high schools were doing their job, but they've lost their way as well. They've devoted more and more time to technical education and seem to go into less depth in every area. When I was teaching college I was shocked by the basic knowledge which students in my intro level classes were lacking. For some of them my course was the first on in which they had been required to read an entire book-length work on a single subject or even the first course where they had been required to read a novel. That's just scary. The public schools have totally replaced reading longer works with anthologies of excerpts and short stories and most horrifically bits of 'literature' of questionable quality written to order as examples of particular techniques. Instead of reading.
And what happened to memorization? By the time I entered high school I had memorized dozens of poems - several in every English class I was in. My parents have even more by memory, including some in other languages. My eldest daughter is entering highschool and has yet to be required to memorize anything. Not a speech from Shakespeare or even a short poem by a major romantic poet.
Abandonning any kind of in-depth study of literature and history destroys the common cultural framework which holds us all together. Now if you don't read on your own or have additional education pushed on you by your parents or major in liberal arts - which everyone thinks is useless and makes you unemployable - you end up a cultural moron, reduced to a state of ignorance which was achieved among the proletariat of previous ages by illiteracy but which we've chosen to embrace for expediency.
Dave
Not really, Saleski. The Wife to Whom I'm Married could kick any three chearleaders' ass. The only thing I missed from the experience was getting stoned and listening to DMB at a frat house. Damn, I hope we reincarnate. Listening to "Jimi Thing" while stoned is an experience I simply must have.
Dave - you really didn't miss anything - the Hot Topic tends to fly under the BC radar.
But Some education is lacking for sure.
Fourth grade - we were memorizing "Trees" by Joyce Kilmer.
Today I'm just thankful that at least one kid has The Lord's Prayer memorized.
Tho - my High Schooler does a pretty good "Speak the Speech" from Hamlet.
the Hot Topic tends to fly under the BC radar.
Maybe we need to do something about that...
Dave
Saleski, was the Brady haircut the key to your success with those cheerleaders?
I never made it to a frat house, either. Huh. Somehow I don't feel all that deprived.
i was in no way implying that i had any success with cheerleaders.
i'm just not bitter about it.
I'm bitter... just not about the town bicycle cheerleaders.
a well-rounded education doesn't have to come in the form of a college degree.
A very good point Mr DJ. One we're probably all wishing we had made. And I'll also agree with the wishing it was easier to just take a class. I live within 10 minutes of Indiana University but taking a singular class is such a pain in the butt I never actually do it.
Nice job on putting this together (finally) Sir Saleski!
a well-rounded education doesn't have to come in the form of a college degree
So true Mr. DJ. My mother was very anti-TV and pro-classical music and books. So for entertainment my brothers and I learned to read for pleasure at a very early age. In fact, before we could read she went through the entire Hobbit and Lord Of The Rings books (a chapter at a time) as our bedtime stories.
I was quite shocked and dismayed when I saw my first Dr. Suess (sp?) book... How fucking lame!
Thanks Mom!
I'm surprised to learn that some here find it difficult to find individual university courses. Don't most colleges have continuing ed programs (usually reasonably priced?) I took some continuing ed courses taught by professional writers who brought in guest editors, which landed me paid writing gigs and publication--something my master's in English never did for me, though I don't regret getting it for a moment.
Elvira, a number of universities do offer "continuing ed" courses and some of them can be quite good. That said, they aren't the same as "real" university courses and there isn't the same variety of course options. It would have been cool to take the Shakespeare class my wife just took. Even though I already have my bachelors I still wouldn't have been able to take that class without a lot of hassle.
Exactly. The city here offers a lot of continuing education courses and adult type courses all of which are pretty cool. But just jumping into a single course at the university on say the films of Fellini is a bit more problematic.
Its not so much that I blame the university for not just letting anybody jump into any course they want at any time, I just sometimes wish I could.
Yes, education is important beyond your career...
Yes, education doesn't end with graduation...
I'm surprised no one has mentioned this, but a broad education also helps your career. An engineer who has read Shakespeare is a better engineer than one who hasn't. Shakespeare teaches an engineer a different way to think. Engineering teaches a playwright a different way to think.
The education argument is often between technical expertise and human development. We shouldn't forget that a wide-ranging education can be defended even from the most utilitarian, careerist perspective.
An elastic mind will always get the promotion over the rigid thinker. First, because the rigid thinker is a jerk. But second, because an engineer who can communicate is a rare thing. As is a Shakespearean actor who understands the physics of set design.
Baronius - this makes a lot of sense. I just wrote an article on something a little similiar.
Though we tend to be more prone to either left or right brain processing - we still have both hemispheres for a reason.






I hate I didn't get in on this- chronic overload and laziness being the key components of it all.
I guess one of the things I was going to suggest is that a well-rounded education doesn't have to come in the form of a college degree. Round out your education while you're in college getting that first degree or round it out later after you've graduated or do it while you're there. The point is learning should never stop. It's a big world out there. Learn something about it. Don't be defined by your job. Be technicolor.
Or something like that.
Well done, MondoPeople.