OPINION

Louisiana Passes Violent Video Game Law on Lies

Written by Matt Paprocki
Published May 20, 2006
page 1 | 2

He doesn't mention what game this is, who's making it, or how it can be played. With statements like this, is it any wonder that the bill unanimously passed 102-0? As if this situation couldn't get any more ridiculous, the people voting to pass this bill were quoted on Game Politics.com as saying that it's up to the courts to decide whether or not the bill is constitutional.

This is where taxpayer dollars are going, towards a bill that will be shot down by the courts like the countless other attempts in numerous states before it. This is a state that still doesn't have homes for people after a hurricane. Apparently, online flash games are a bigger problem than the kids who don't have homes, let alone a computer to play them on.

There's a bigger question then, and that's where did bashing of online flash games come from? Sources like the Parents Television Council. In a lavishly constructed manipulative editorial, PTC founder L. Brent Bozell states this about another online game, Super Columbine RPG:

It's stories like this that underline why states are cracking down on the sale of violent video games to minors. Violent video game legislation has passed in Michigan, Illinois and California, and is being considered in many states including Missouri, Kansas, and Minnesota as well as at the federal level. But the players of Super Columbine RPG don't need an ID to prove they're an adult. Any child can just download this sick game, free of charge, in the privacy of his own disturbed world.

The game has players taking loose control of Kleibold and Harris on the horrifying day and playing out the events. It's a message piece, right or wrong. There's some discussion on the availability of guns, parenting, and of course video games in addition to the sick act of deciding how the events should play out. That's not important to Bozell though, or that the movie Elephant also based itself on the same events.

He's pulling the same stunt Burrell did, preying on an uninformed public. He has every right to voice his thoughts on the game. That's encouraged no matter which side of this debate you're on. It's when he does something like this to shamelessly push people away from a new entertainment medium because he disapproves that it becomes a problem.

This is what people see from the video game industry. This is what the mainstream media covers.

That's why instead of ranting and raving on a message board about how much better the Playstation 3 will be than the Xbox 360, put that energy to good use. As a gamer, you've been pasted as a violent lunatic who takes pleasure in playing a game based on Columbine. That needs to stop. Write these senators. Tell them they're wrong or wasting their time passing bills that won't become law. Write the local news when they feature a story on games like Border Patrol.

Otherwise, you're only letting them win on lies.

page 1 | 2
Matt Paprocki is the former reviews editor for Digital Press, a video game website with an appreciation for the retro side of the industry. The deep game collection which spans nearly 30 systems and 2,000 games line his walls for research purposes. Matt strives to bring credibility to video game journalism, and take it in a new direction to aid the industry in becoming respected with all forms entertainment media. He currently freelances for GameArgus.com and MultiPlayerGames.com.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Louisiana Passes Violent Video Game Law on Lies
Published: May 20, 2006
Type: Opinion
Section: Gaming
Filed Under: Politics: Law and Rights, Gaming: News
Writer: Matt Paprocki
Matt Paprocki's BC Writer page
Matt Paprocki's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Matt Paprocki
Politics: Law and Rights
Gaming: News
All Gaming Articles
All Opinion articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — May 20, 2006 @ 13:09PM — Jed Merrill

Someday, people may make their decision on which state to live in based on whether the state is "gamer" friendly. Louisiana apparently is not!

#2 — May 20, 2006 @ 14:28PM — Joey

Yet another reason to shun Louisiana as the idyllic spot to take up root.

#3 — May 21, 2006 @ 21:26PM — Mr. Real Estate [URL]

Politiciabs who won't ban guns will ban video games in the name of safety. How interesting...

#4 — May 23, 2006 @ 16:23PM — Jack Thompson [URL]

You're entitled to your opinions. You're not entitled to your own set of facts.

#5 — May 23, 2006 @ 20:20PM — Jason "Njiska" Westhaver [URL]

Exactly Jack, you're entitled to your opinions. You're not entitled to your own set of facts.

#6 — May 23, 2006 @ 22:20PM — Matt Paprocki [URL]

I don't need my own set of facts. You do Jack so you make some sense when you speak in public. Care to enlighten us on the "research" you did to learn that the Dual Shock is causing kids to be more violent? Care to tell us why you said Rockstar and Sony use this for this purpose and not the thousands of others? Care to tell us about any long term research that shows video games make people violent? Care to tell us why you didn't stop Burrell when he ranted about online flash games the bill has nothing to do with?

#7 — May 25, 2006 @ 03:53AM — -E [URL]

Congrats, this article was picked for one of this week's Ed Picks. Keep up the good work.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/48018)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments