REVIEW

Online Shorts Digest: No. 1 - Why I Love Animation

Written by A. Horbal
Published May 16, 2006

I'm always dismayed when I encounter a fellow cineaste willing to dismiss animation. Why do I personally love animated films? To paraphrase Annie Oakley: anything live action can do, animation can do better. And cheaper!

These are some animated shorts that I've been enjoying online, beginning with an Academy Award nominee (1999 - Best Short Film, Animated):

More 1998 United States, Mark Osborne.

I'm actually not in love with this film for the same reason that Pauline Kael resented Fantasia. She wrote about that film that it wrecked music by "forcing us to hear it forever after with incongruous images welded to it" (New Yorker 11 November 1972). I can no longer hear New Order's "Elegia" without seeing Osborne's film. Of course, this is also a testament to just how well the images complement the music.

What impresses me most about this film is Osborne's use of color and its absence for emotional affect. It's extraordinarily difficult to manipulate color like this in a live action film without simply switching between black and white and color, which as often as not feels contrived.

Watch More

Animators can also appropriate the aesthetics of other artistic mediums much more successfully than live action filmmakers. For instance:

What Barry Says 2004 United Kingdom, Simon Robson.

The film's politics aside, Robson has basically taken contemporary political street propaganda and turned it into film art. Animators can actually incorporate their source material into their work, whereas live action filmmakers have to settle for imitation (as in Warren Beatty's Dick Tracy, which tried to recreate the look of a three-color comic strip).

Watch What Barry Says

Thinking along these same lines, animators can also create an entire film out of other movies, as in the collage film:

Fast Film 2003 Austria/Luxembourg, Virgil Widrich.

Fast Film is both a love letter to and a critique of classical Hollywood cinema. The film was made by making 65,000 photocopies from over 300 different films and arranging them into a prototypical Hollywood film. I absolutely love Widrich's commentary on the interchangeability of actors during the studio era and on Hollywood's treatment of women.

Godard once said that best way to critique a film is to make another one of your own. Animation can do him one better by actually using the films in question!

Watch Fast Film

Talking about the animated shorts of Chuck Jones, Roger Ebert noted that "no director has more power than a director of animated films" (RogerEbert.com 15 January 2006). Because they have absolute control over their universe they are best able to draw attention to filmmaking's inherent artifice. Such is the aim of:

page 1 | 2
The author's name is Andrew Horbal. He blogs about film criticism at No More Marriages! and writes about film for Lucid Screening and PopMatters. He thanks you for your time and consideration.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Online Shorts Digest: No. 1 - Why I Love Animation
Published: May 16, 2006
Type: Review
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Animation, Video: Art House, Video: Classics
Writer: A. Horbal
A. Horbal's BC Writer page
A. Horbal's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by A. Horbal
Video: Animation
Video: Art House
Video: Classics
All Video Articles
A. Horbal's personal weblog
All Review articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/47822)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments