OPINION

A Fitting Name for the New York Mets New Ballpark: Jackie Robinson Field

Written by Victor Lana
Published April 09, 2006
page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7

Fortunately, all the many things that have plagued fans at Shea have been considered in the planning for the construction of the new ballpark. It seems the first and foremost priority was aesthetics, and that is very pleasing to this fan. Reminiscent of the old home of the Dodgers in Brooklyn, the new structure will have striking brick arches along the façade with limestone and granite flourishes; the arches will contain semicircle windows in the top of each arch just like the ones in Ebbets Field. There will be space made for commemorative bronze plaques along the top of the building, and any exposed steel will be painted in rich Mets blue. This kind of return to a traditional-styled park will please most Mets fans, for Shea has always been a clash of 60s modernism and practicality with the harsh reality of its obviously unpleasant structural incongruities.

Also, looking at the statistics above, one can see that the goal was to make the amenities available to a smaller and more comfortable crowd. The Upper Deck at Shea has always been nosebleed land, and the wind whipping off Flushing Bay swooshed around those seats unmercifully. Now there will only be two major seating decks and a Club Level for the lounges and restaurants. All the facilities will have easy viewing of the action on the field, and the Promenade Grill sounds most promising as a restaurant that will be hanging down from that level and almost over the action on the field.

Listening to Jeff Wilpon, son of team owner and former Brooklyn Dodger fan Fred Wilpon, talking about the project convinced me that this was a labor of love. There were original plans for a domed stadium prior to 9/11, but Mr. Wilpon indicated that event changed everything, including the vision for this new park. Now the park is being designed to be more intimate, with a good deal less ground in foul territory because of seats that will be extremely close to the field. And, speaking of seats, there has been obvious attention to the fact that watching games at Shea used to be uncomfortable. The seats will be wider and legroom has been increased significantly.

Besides all the technical information that is impressive, most of all I think the city and the Mets organization have done justice to baseball history. The New York Met fans of today would not exist without the Dodger fans of yesterday. Dodger fans lived for their team, even when it was losing, and they went to games in a small ballpark where there was significant opportunity for exchange with each other and the players too. This has been recognized in the planning of this new park, and in my mind it takes a great deal of love to say we will design a park with ten thousand less seats in order that each fan who does attend a game will feel right at home. That's a design that doesn't have making money as a top priority (for more seats = more tickets = more money).

page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7
Victor Lana has published numerous stories and articles in literary magazines and online, including his favorite haunt here at Blogcritics. His novels A Death in Prague (2002) and Move (2003) and his new book The Savage Quiet September Sun: A Collection of 9/11 Stories are available at online bookstores.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
A Fitting Name for the New York Mets New Ballpark: Jackie Robinson Field
Published: April 09, 2006
Type: Opinion
Section: Sports
Filed Under: Culture: History, Culture: Society, Sports: Baseball
Writer: Victor Lana
Victor Lana's BC Writer page
Victor Lana's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Victor Lana
Culture: History
Culture: Society
Sports: Baseball
All Sports Articles
All Opinion articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — April 9, 2006 @ 18:11PM — Gary Berman

A fitting legacy indeed!

#2 — April 9, 2006 @ 20:55PM — Matthew T. Sussman [URL]

Victor, nice proposal. Can we name the toilets after Mo Vaughn?

#3 — April 9, 2006 @ 22:07PM — Victor Lana [URL]

Suss, we can name the toilets after Big Mo only if the garbage disposal system is named in Bobby Bonilla's honor. Now, if I could just think of something apropos for Richie Hebner, Stork Theodore, and Bret Saberhagen (maybe Waste Management?)

#4 — April 10, 2006 @ 17:57PM — J. P. Spencer

It's a lovely idea. Unfortunately, in this time of extreme commerce, naming a stadium after Jackie Robinson won't make anyone any money in the Mets front office.

Expect it to be named after some huge multinational conglomerate who's willing to shell out millions of dollars a year for the naming rights. Hanging a "42" on the outfield fence, in the mind of Major League Baseball, gets them off the hook. What a travesty!

#5 — April 10, 2006 @ 19:43PM — Victor Lana [URL]

Right you are, JP. You know what I find a travesty: that anyplace in baseball could have been named Enron Field. Just a disgrace.

#6 — April 10, 2006 @ 21:03PM — joe

no way,if u want to name the park to a great man fine,not to a baseball player who always would cry the blues and did not like white people,get real,read between the lines of his statements.I would love to see MLK who was for all people,not someone for one people.

#7 — April 10, 2006 @ 22:25PM — MCH

Victor;

Good idea, it'd be a great tribute to a great pioneer. The obstacles he overcame changed the face of professional sports.

#8 — April 11, 2006 @ 13:26PM — Victor Lana [URL]

Without specifics and actual sources, I don't know how to comment on #6 directly.

At this point in time, everything I've ever read about Jackie Robinson has been so positive and an affirmation of his conduct as a player and a human being. Ever hear his teammate Pee Wee Reese talk about him? It's worth listening.

Thanks, MCH; I hope Jackie will get the recognition he deserves.

#9 — April 11, 2006 @ 19:14PM — Sean

You want to name the Mets new park (in Queens) after a Brooklyn Dodger?

Did Jackie Robinson ever play for the Mets?

#10 — May 4, 2006 @ 16:04PM — John

Why not name the stadium after Sandy Koufax. He was a Brooklyn Dodger, the greatest jewish baseball player and a friend of the Mets owner.

No wait let's name it after Roberto Clemente. The great Pirate who fought prejudice and died helping victims in a earthquake.

No let's name it after Hank Aaron the great home run hitter for the Braves who help lead the fight against racism.

No wait this is the METS ball park, not the Pirates or the Braves or the bleeping Dodgers. For all the METS fans who were born after the Dodgers left (and the Giants, remember them); any time some old sport writer starts talking about the good ol' days of the Dodgers, we feel like buying them a one way ticket to LA.

Why don't the Dodgers change the name of Dodger Stadium to Jackie Robinson Stadium and just leave the Mets to the MET fans.

Its a given that Jackie Robinson was not just a great baseball player but, a great American. And one of the most important people in American history of the 20th Century.

But, we're just naming a ballpark and while most New Yorkers don't want to go Pepsi Park or The Home Depot Stadium, there are a lot of fans that are Met fan and want the park to embrace the history of the Mets and not the Dodgers.

#11 — May 4, 2006 @ 16:28PM — NR Davis [URL]

That makes a lot of sense (sez this longtime Mets fan; they're my National League team). But you know what? Given a choice between Jackie Robinson Stadium and one named after some collective of corporate robber barons, I'll take honoring a ballplayer. The same holds for a Sandy Koufax, Henry Aaron or Roberto Clemente stadium. But in the end... Fed Ex or Comcast or some other icky entity will get the honors.

Of course, in Baltimore we ignore that shit. The city's football stadium is named after a big local bank that shelled out a bundle for naming rights, but ask any real fan - they'll call it Ravens Stadium. (The baseball stadium, reasonably, is named Oriole Park at Camden Yards, "the Yards" being the historic location of the side-by-side sports facilities.)

#12 — June 14, 2006 @ 05:19AM — Doug DeLise

To All, Jackie Robinson, while being a history maker, did not make ANY history for the New York Mets. There are several baseball parks, stadiums, facilities named for him all across our country. The Cubs Minor League in Daytona Beach has one. When the Dodgers build a new stadium (and they will) it will be up to them to name their new stadium after Jackie Robinson, anything else would be premature. The N.Y. Mets new stadium should bear a name in Mets history, who knows maybe Payson Park?

#13 — October 12, 2006 @ 04:27AM — Craig B [URL]

If given a choice between a corporate name or another, business wise the corporate name will take place. So if there was that choice there is no way an owner will pass on 50 Million a year in order to name a park after a player, especially a player that never played for that team.
Naming the new stadium after Jackie Robinson will indeed be an honor to his memory. However, it would be a dishonor to all the players, coaches, and managers that have come through the Mets organization over the past 45 years. If we must go back on history then name the park after the heart and soul of the baby Mets, Ms. Joan Payson.
There are so many choices out there, Gil Hodges, Casey Stengel, Tom Seaver, etc. Geez, Don Zimmer even played for the Mets. If this is such an important deal, how come the Dodgers never named, or renamed for that matter their park at Chavez Ravine? It has always been called "DODGER STADIUM". If the organization that had Robinson, and so proudly proclaims that "they" had the first black ball player in the majors hasn't named their stadium after him why should a team that has NO connection to him do so? I love the Mets because I was brought up with them, my family were Brooklyn Dodger fans, and like millions were stabbed in the back when the O'Malleys took "Dem Bums" from us, but the Mets came in honoring the Dodgers and the Giants with the Orange and Blue - I think that is enough. We have history of our own that s hould be honored first and foremost! Changing the Interboro to Jackie Robinson stadium was okay. The city shold have just gone and renamed Ebbets Field projects after him. People may not know this but there are many things named after him in New York - next to the aforementioned projects is Jackie Robinson Elementary P.S. 375 - in Manhattan is the Jackie Robinson H.S., even a Jackie Robinson Center for Physical Culture, etc. etc. get the drift? These are proper places for his name. NOT ON THE WALLS OF A STADIUM FOR A TEAM HE NEVER PLAYED FOR!

#14 — March 19, 2007 @ 11:15AM — Wong

They dont need to waste money on a stadium they suck they need to waste money on players not druggy's either

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/46164)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments