NEWS

Blogcritics on Immigration

Written by Eric Olsen
Published April 01, 2006
page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7

The Southwest Conference on Illegal Immigration, Border Security, and Crime
If there is hope of another option, a legal one, don't you think that most of them would rather go that route?
Posted to Politics by Richard Marcus on October 1, 2005 05:57 PM

America Speaks More than English
Libraries are feeling both the pressures of multi cultural populations and the reactionary reaction to any immigration.
Posted to Culture by Howard Dratch on September 8, 2005 02:13 AM

The Border Has Two Sides
Recently there have been a number of Blogcritics posts about the problems on the border of Mexico and the US; especially the border of Arizona where vigilante groups proliferate. These articles are of interest since I am American and...
Posted to Culture by Howard Dratch on August 24, 2005 01:25 AM

The Immigration Time-bomb
The immigration issue is the political equivalent of a time-bomb in American politics. Depending of whether it is defused or explodes, it will either strengthen or blow apart existing American electoral coalitions. The issue is dangerous to the current political...
Posted to Politics by Drew McKissick on August 23, 2005 04:23 PM

Illegal immigration testing our humanity
Illegal immigration is no longer an exclusively right-wing concern - it is a liberal, humanitarian one
Posted to Politics by Mark Edward Manning on August 20, 2005 01:53 PM

Getting Real About Illegal Undocumented Immigrant Aliens
Almost no one I know (I live in West Los Angeles, CA., and run a factory in South East LA) wants to forcibly send home 8,000,000 or 20,000,000 individuals who have come to live in our country by means outside...
Posted to Politics by Randy Kirk on June 3, 2005 12:33 AM

page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7
Career media professional Eric Olsen is honored to be the founder and publisher of Blogcritics.org, which, quite frankly, rules - as do his wife and four children.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Blogcritics on Immigration
Published: April 01, 2006
Type: News
Section: Politics
Filed Under: Politics: Policy, Politics: Law and Rights, Politics: International, Politics: Government, Culture: Administrative, Politics: U.S.
Writer: Eric Olsen
Eric Olsen's BC Writer page
Eric Olsen's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Eric Olsen
Politics: Policy
Politics: Law and Rights
Politics: International
Politics: Government
Culture: Administrative
Politics: U.S.
All Politics Articles
Eric Olsen's personal weblog
All News articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — April 4, 2006 @ 09:47AM — Raj B [URL]

What about Legal Permanent Residents waiting to unite with their families? Anyone willing to blog about this?

#2 — April 13, 2006 @ 18:05PM — edward przydzial [URL]

no amnesty. enforce the law. all who crossed our border without permission are criminals and do NOT have rights. they are illegal. they need to pay all back taxes, they should not be voting or sending thier children to our schools... using our services while refusing to speak english, refusing to assimilate to the country they say they want to be a part of. they are mexico's illiterate, criminals and poor people being sent here by mexican leaders who have violated the us border for the past 25 years. they claim rights but the fact is THEY are NOT legal citizens so they DO NOT HAVE RIGHTS, or the right to be on our soil and all companies who have employed these 'illegals' need to pay for this immigration problem we are faced with.


#3 — April 13, 2006 @ 18:12PM — edward przydzial [URL]

why should 'illegals' get to violate our law over the others who have tried being citizens legally? that's not fair or right. these 'illegals' have contributed nothing to this country... past immigrants came here and
built our cities and our nation but these people are here to re-colinize the southwest into mexico... they were told to display american flags after the news showed them on the first few days how disrecpectful they were running through the streets waving mexican flags...

if you do it legal you belong here if not you are an 'illegal' and continued living/hiding in the shadows and being paid under the table does not help your cause so you should report or go back and apply for re-entry...

#4 — April 13, 2006 @ 18:15PM — edward przydzial [URL]

if the 'illegals' left our wages would be 'higher' and american's would do the jobs for the decent pay. these 'illegals' keep us hard working americans slaves to low wages high taxes and bosses who do not care but will hire an 'iilegal' to replace you for below minimum wage and under the table payments...

#5 — May 2, 2006 @ 20:00PM — Bill

I'm just wondering if WalMart has a big hand in this immigration thing. Considering that they've been caught several times employing (and abusing) illegal aliens, it wouldn't surprise me if they are behind the scenes, exerting a lot of pressure (AKA $$$) on Congress and being an anonymous organizer of these protests. If this is true and their ploy works you'll see a lot more abuse of both Federal laws and of these poor people as well. WalMart has such a "black eye" because of their previous abuses, that a little propaganda of being the "good guy on the block" wouldn't hurt them.

#6 — May 15, 2006 @ 18:35PM — El Bicho [URL]

Reviews of a couple of films that deal with illegal immigration: The Gatekeeper and In This World

#7 — May 17, 2006 @ 10:31AM — Bliffle

The problem lies in a corrupt mexican government that supports a nepotistic family oligopoly that exports it's economic failures to the US.

#8 — May 17, 2006 @ 14:41PM — Mark Bellinghaus [URL]

Just found this article. Very interesting indeed. That's a very important toppic. Great information. Thank you.

#9 — May 24, 2006 @ 14:29PM — Heloise

By the numbers it would cost the US taxpayers ONE BILLION dollars for every million illegal immigrants that are allowed to remain in this country. I am rounding off the numbers mentioned on Lou Dobbs this week. It is astounding. Here's more from NUMBERSUSA about how the vote went and who is responsible for almost allowing over 100 MILLION illegals into this country over the next 20 years. Mind you that would be a BILLION with a B for every million illegals let in our home.

KEEP UP WITH SENATE VOTES
AS THEY HAPPEN ON OUR SPECIAL
'VOTE DAY ACTION CENTER'

Our NumbersUSA Capitol Hill staff is doing an extraordinary job of putting on line every amendment as it is offered, with a cogent and accurate summary. You will see all of them on the Vote Day Action Center page.

And you will see the results of all votes on each of the amendments (with links to the roll call tally).

www.numbersusa.com/hottopic/2454.html

THIS WEEK'S WORST OF THE WORST ENEMIES OF THE AMERICAN WORKER

Bond (R-MO)
Brownback (R-KS)
Chafee (R-RI)
DeWine (R-OH)
Graham (R-SC)
Gregg (R-NH)
Hagel (R-NE)
Kennedy (D-MA)
Lieberman (D-CT)
Lugar (R-IN)
Martinez (R-FL)
McCain (R-AZ)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Salazar (D-CO)
Shelby (R-AL)
Smith (R-OR)
Specter (R-PA)
Stevens (R-AK)

The Senate is full of people who believe that American workers should have to compete with millions of imported foreign workers.

But on the Sen. Bingaman amendment to put some limits on the damage to the American worker, the 18 Senators above showed that they apparently have no limits.

Those 18 Senators voted to keep in the bill a provision that the Heritage Foundation announced on Monday would allow corporations to import more than 130 million foreign workers over the next 20 years!!!

Senators McCain and Kennedy are responsible for the original language that would have led to such an absurd conclusion. NumbersUSA has been railing against that provision for a year. But when the Heritage Foundation widely publicized the numerical impact on Monday, most Senators began to be concerned that the bill might be far more radical than they had realized.

Sen. Bingaman (D-NM) offered an amendment yesterday that would cap the guestworker program at 200,000 a year, allowing 2 million over 20 years instead of more than 130 million. We definitely don't want 2 million guestworkers, all of whom would be allowed under S. 2611 to become U.S. citizens. But the amendment showed some sanity.

I hope you will call the offices of those 18 Senators and let their staff know what you think about their insistence on giving corporations another 130 million foreign workers -- on top of the nearly 50 million foreign workers and dependents who already are here.

Just so you get your facts straight: The 18 Senators above voted to table (kill) the Bingaman amendment, which would have left the 130 million extra foreign workers in the bill.

These 18 Senators apparently would do anything the U.S. Chamber of Commerce asked them to do, regardless of what their constituents thing. Or would they? Your incredible outpouring of phone calls today and Thursday and Friday might just change the minds of some of them.

(When the 18 failed to table the amendment, it then passed on voice vote.)

HIDING?

Cochran (R-MS)
Lott (R-MS)
Rockefeller (D-WV)

If you live in Mississippi or West Virginia, find out why these three are not voting on any of the amendments.

Rockefeller has a history of avoiding tough immigration votes because he is torn between following Democratic open-border leadership and the overwhelming wishes for immigration restrictions of the West Virginia voters (as represented so well by the state's other Democratic Senator, Robert Byrd).

If we are to have any chance of blocking this terrible amnesty on the final vote, we are probably going to have to have Cochran, Lott and Rockefeller.

They need to hear from all of you who live in their states -- now.

THIS WEEK'S GREATEST FRIENDS OF AMERICAN WORKERS (OPPOSED MASS IMPORTING OF FOREIGN WORKER COMPETITION)

Baucus (D-MT)
Bayh (D-IN)
Boxer (D-CA)
Byrd (D-WV)
Clinton (D-NY)
Coburn (R-OK)
Conrad (D-ND)
Dayton (D-MN)
Dodd (D-CT)
Dole (R-NC)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Durbin (D-IL)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Harkin (D-IA)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Inouye (D-HI)
Levin (D-MI)
Nelson (D-NE)
Obama (D-IL)
Reed (D-RI)
Roberts (R-KS)
Sarbanes (D-MD)
Schumer (D-NY)
Sessions (R-AL)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Talent (R-MO)
Vitter (R-LA)
Wyden (D-OR)

You are going to see some names on that list that you usually don't see when we are praising Senators.

But praise where praise is due.

Chief hero in this fight was Sen. Dorgan (D-North Dakota) who is one of the five best immigration-sanity champions overall in the Senate.

Dorgan introduced an amendment to kill the guest worker provisions of S. 2611 entirely.

The 28 Senators in the list supported that effort by voting against a motion to table the amendment.

It was gratifying to see so many Democrats, for a change, living up to their reputation of supposedly being the champion of the working classes. Many of the Democrats on this list have been big supporters of amnesties for illegal aliens. It is assumed that even though this bill still has the guestworker program that they opposed that they will vote for the bill in the final ballot because they want an amnesty so badly.

When you call to praise them for trying to kill the guestworker program, urge them to be consistent and vote to kill the amnesty which will keep million of illegal aliens in unfair job competition with present American workers and will entice millions more illegal aliens to compete in the future.

Probably the biggest applause has to go to the few Republicans who totally defied the U.S. Chamber of Commerce (which usually has such a stranglehold on the Republican Party) and voted to kill the new mass guestworker program that will allow all to become permanent residents. Give a special thanks to Republican Senators Coburn, Dole, Inhofe, Roberts, Sessions, Talent and Vitter.

REWARDING ILLEGAL ALIENS MORE IMPORTANT TO THESE SENATORS THAN PROVIDING SECURITY

Akaka (D-HI)
Baucus (D-MT)
Bayh (D-IN)
Bennett (R-UT)
Biden (D-DE)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Boxer (D-CA)
Brownback (R-KS)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Carper (D-DE)
Chafee (R-RI)
Clinton (D-NY)
Coleman (R-MN)
Collins (R-ME)
Craig (R-ID)
Dayton (D-MN)
DeWine (R-OH)
Dodd (D-CT)
Durbin (D-IL)
Feingold (D-WI)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Graham (R-SC)
Hagel (R-NE)
Harkin (D-IA)
Inouye (D-HI)
Jeffords (I-VT)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kennedy (D-MA)
Kerry (D-MA)
Kohl (D-WI)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
Lieberman (D-CT)
Lincoln (D-AR)
Lugar (R-IN)
Martinez (R-FL)
Menendez (D-NJ)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Murray (D-WA)
Nelson (D-FL)
Obama (D-IL)
Pryor (D-AR)
Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV)
Salazar (D-CO)
Sarbanes (D-MD)
Schumer (D-NY)
Shelby (R-AL)
Snowe (R-ME)
Specter (R-PA)
Stevens (R-AK)
Voinovich (R-OH)
Warner (R-VA)

These 55 Senators voted against the amendment by Sen. Isakson (R-GA) that would have at least held off granting amnesty rewards to illegal aliens until after it could be certified that our borders are secure.

Since most of the supporters of amnesty claim they are equally in support of secure borders and enforcement against future illegal immigration, one would think they would be fine with guaranteeing that the security and enforcement provisions don't get left unimplemented as happened in the 1986 amnesty.

But the 55 Senators above said, "No way. Amnesty first and then you guys can just wait and see if any enforcement ever happens in the future." OK, nobody actually said that, but that's what I infer.

The vote on the Isakson amendment will probably be the clearest vote on S. 2611 to show you which Senators are the most supportive of amnesties and of helping illegal aliens.

If your Senators are on the list above, ask them why they were against the amendment. To support this amendment was not to even oppose amnesty but to say it has to come after enforcement. The 55 above wouldn't even go along with that. They are Amnesty Above All.

If we are to block S. 2611 in the final vote, we probably are going to have to win over at least five of the people on that list.

Maybe if you hammer them hard enough, you can deliver five!

Why is rewarding illegal aliens so much more important than the security of our country with these Senators?


NOT VOTING
Cochran (R-MS)
Gregg (R-NH)
Lott (R-MS)
McCain (R-AZ)
Rockefeller (D-WV)

#10 — June 3, 2006 @ 06:21AM — edward przydzial [URL]

...yes i did vote for bush. yes i do agree with 'most' but not 'all' of his policies...
the illegal immigration issue is one i disagree with the president... i would like to see the borders controlled and a wall. enforce the laws of the land on the illegals here... they need to report and show themselves. as if we can't see them to begin with...
they should NOT be allowed legal status. it shows america our rules and laws mean nothing. they have violated the very rights and laws they demand from the united states and we owe them nothing.
and to the illegals here "YOU DO NOT SPEAK FOR ME".

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/45821)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments