I'm Not a Ho, I Just Have Friends
Published March 26, 2006
And I don't think I was anything special or unusual. Or maybe all the women I know are similarly situated. My best friend, Sangs, who went to school in our rigidly conservative hometown and ended up with an equal number of guy friends with whom she was most emphatically not romantically involved, once told me about a family friend whose marriage plans were cancelled at the nth minute. Apparently she was marrying some guy who'd never looked a girl in the eye before his horoscope was matched to hers while she was a normal kid who'd grown up in the Middle East and who'd managed to scrounge up some friends of both sexes and different nationalities in spite of the fact that she attended a same-sex school and nationalities tended to segregate in her locality. So the hick that she was going to marry (pardon me my condescension, but really!) came to visit or for the engagement or whatever and ended up reading her emails.
I have no idea what he was doing in her email account but he came across her inbox which was filled with "hey wassup" notes from various friends. He was outraged to discover all those male names in there - none of which went beyond the hey-how-are-you stage - and broke it all off. The girl was only too relieved coz she was basically in it to please her mom and dad, but Sangs was mad.
"What an asshole," she said.
Her father agreed. Her father, who has the strictest Malayalee father notions on girls and how they ought to behave, was taken aback by this young man's behavior. "In this day and age," he said to me, "One has to expect that girls and boys will be friends and that it doesn't necessarily mean anything."
And therein lies the problem - sex and sexism.
Sex, because for a people who live in complete denial of it, the act determines so many aspects of desi lives. What we wear, how we walk, what we say, the people we interact with, the way we regard someone, where we go, what we read, what we hide, so many things, all based upon sex. The fear of it or the suspicion of it.
And sexism because we still haven't understood that when you talk about leveling the playing field, then you can't do it in some ways and not in others. When girls and boys are given, even nominally, the same opportunities as each other then you can't expect it not to leave some sort of mark. You can't tell a girl that she is just as good or even better and give her every chance to prove it and in the end turn around and tell her the past was all prologue and now that she's topped her class, become a neuroscientist, and beaten every other obstacle in her path, what's really important is the quality of her curry. Because, you know, that's the bottom line - Ms. India Perfect, Neuroscientist and Curry Maker. Well dowried for a good home.
- I'm Not a Ho, I Just Have Friends
- Published: March 26, 2006
- Type: Opinion
- Section: Culture
- Filed Under: Culture: Family and Relationships, Culture: Society, Culture: Travel
- Writer: Amrita Rajan
- Amrita Rajan's BC Writer page
- Amrita Rajan's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
Great article - funny, but with a serious point, too. I'd say more, but sadly my post-breakfast brain doesn't get much better than this.
Excellent article Amrita.
Have you seen "When Harry Met Sally," with Billy Crystal?
It supports what I believe. Men and women can't be close friends out of wedlock. Let me rephrase; women can, but men can't. Men, when they are near or around females think about them sexually much of the time. Your guy friends, though they may respect you personally and professionally, still were attracted to you. Perhaps none of them ever made a pass, but that's because they respected you enough not to. That's probably due to you being a strong and intelligent woman.
@ Diane - thanks! I'll take it I left you speechless :)
@ nugget - who hasnt? and you might have a point although it leaves me feeling slightly icky thinking of some, and slightly flattered thinking of others. thanks for reading :)
I have seen "When Harry Met Sally" and I disagree with the premise of that movie and with nugget.
I have a close female friend who I have known for over 10 years, and there really isn't a subject we can't talk about but I really don't have much of a desire to sleep with her, for the simple reason that I don't find her very attractive. She feels quite the opposite, however.
Bottom line is, if the physical chemistry isn't there on both sides, it doesn't matter how strong or intelligent she is. Unless, of course, the man is one of those who is just interested in another notch on his bedpost, I suppose, but to say all men are like that is painting with way too broad a brush. I only think about women sexually if I'm attracted to them, and there are many, a vast majority really, that don't attract me, therefore I don't think about them that way.
hey steve - thanks for the comment. interestingly, to me it seemed to support the movie's and nugget's theory that men and women can;t ever have a relationship without it having brushed against sexuality at some point ("She feels quite the opposite, however. ")
where you and nugget seem to disagree is on the issue of men and how much sex on the brain do they really have.
Yes, my comment was directed more toward nugget, Amrita.
The movie at least, suggested consumation was inevitable, which is further than 'brushed against sexuality' as you put it.
i think nugget has brains, and the writter has memories.
Nice to know some things are universal, like parents. Almost fell out of my chair laughing over your comment that most of your friends who've met your father, hang up.






That was really good. I'd say more, but my pre-breakfast brain isn't ready for substantial thought.