OPINION

TV Review: Black.White - 3/22/06

Written by Scott Butki
Published March 26, 2006

The premise of this show is simple: Take two families, a white one from Santa Monica, California, and a black one from Atlanta, Georgia, and have them live together in a house in L.A.

I am using the series to explore issues and thoughts regarding race relations..

The March 22 show begins with the two families — the white and the black families — discussing a speech by Carmen, the white mother, shown near the end of last week's show.

As I wrote:


The poets share some of their material and it was wonderful. There are some talented writers among the bunch. Then Carmen ruins the moment. She starts by thanking them for sharing their poetry and telling them they are amazing artists. She says it in a way that suggests the poets were hoping for her approval and should now be pleased that the white woman has said they are good folks.

Carmen then babbles a bit before making a comment where it sounds like she is objectifying the members, referring to a "powerful black male physique." She also mentions that she has not determined yet whether one young man is gay or straight, as if it is any of her business, let alone appropriate to say in front of the group. When she is done, the poets split. Can you blame them?

Renee later sums up her reaction to Carmen's speech at the poetry incident: "I was so embarrassed and angry at the same time. There she goes again." And Renee is right.

Carmen also uses the phrase "beautiful black creature" and its the word creature that irks the black family.

As the episode is starting Carmen is totally unapologetic about her actions.

Indeed, when her daughter, Rose, the one member of the white family that appears to get the problems at hand, broaches the subject, her mom snaps at her.

"Rose, it seems you are trying to make nice and I don't like that. It was not about being (bleep) politically correct," Carmen said. "Don't correct me right now."

Carmen says her comments were coming "from total love. If you misinterpreted it, that's on you."

She later says she is having trouble liking the other family.

This is how it has been during the first and second episodes with Carmen and Bruno, the white mother and father. The two are acting like it is okay for them to use the N-word or Carmen to call the black mother, "bitch," because it was not meant to be offensive.

As if that matters.

It's a classic problem that I have seen in virtual communities, at Blogcritics, and in "real" conversation. Does the person making offensive remarks bear responsibility if the person takes offense, even if that is not the intent? Put another way, does intent matter if the person is offended?

That seems to be what is happening over and over, with this white family and with many white people in America: they make statements and take actions which are offensive to minority groups but then act like they bear no responsibility because that was not the intent.

Racial profiling? Hey, some say that is not meant to be offensive — it is meant to improve security and fight crime. Yet doesn't it look racist by its very nature? And yet I bet police officers pulling over black drivers or Arab airplane passengers will be quick to say their actions have nothing to do with race and are not meant to be offensive.

page 1 | 2
Scott Butki was a newspaper reporter for more than 10 years before making a career change into education. He is an in-house media critic, a recovering Tetris addict and a proud uncle.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Buy from Amazon.com
Black Like Me Black Like Me
John Howard Griffin
Book,

TV Review: Black.White - 3/22/06
Published: March 26, 2006
Type: Opinion
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Television, Video: Reality TV, Culture: Society
Writer: Scott Butki
Scott Butki's BC Writer page
Scott Butki's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Scott Butki
Video: Television
Video: Reality TV
Culture: Society
All Video Articles
All Opinion articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — March 26, 2006 @ 23:35PM — Nicholas Stix [URL]

Ah, a nostalgic look at America, circa 1956.

#2 — March 27, 2006 @ 12:37PM — Joanie [URL]

Scott, perhaps you're not aware of it, but you actually perpetuate many of the mistakes you see Carmen and Bruno make in this show.

This isn't a criticism, merely an observation.

For example: in your article about the blogger caught plagiarising, you bring up "black journalist Jayson Blair" and follow that up with "conservative white blogger Ben..."

Race had nothing to do with that situation. Yet, you brought that into play. The simple fact is, both men were caught stealing and both were censured for doing so.

Another example: instead of saying "the white couple/mom/dad/family" or the "black couple/mom/dad/family" every time you mention them, couldn't you just say at the beginning of each article "white family: Carmen, Bruno, and Rose" and "black family: Renee, Brian, and Nick", and then make the reader remember the people not by their skin color, but by their actions?

Again, not criticism, merely observation.

#3 — March 27, 2006 @ 14:20PM — Scott Butki

Hi Joanie. Interesting observation but I have to disagree.
I debated whether to mention Blair's race but since he - and his editors - cited his race as a reason why he was not busted earlier I thought it important to mention it.

I've been trying to figure out an easier way to explain which character in the show is which - i'll try next time the other way, as you suggest.

It gets confusing when you're talking about, say, the white father who is black during the acting of a scene.

But I take your point and it's a valid criticism.

#4 — March 31, 2006 @ 22:21PM — john

do you think though, that if the black family in their white makeup was to go to a club or something where everyone else was black and white people never go into, thet they wouldn't get the same stares. This show is one sided. It shows racism against blacks but doesn't flip the tables. I'm not saying racism isn't worse for blacks, but it isn't like whites have this free go anywhere do anything pass either.

#5 — April 2, 2006 @ 14:05PM — Scott Butki

Yes, the whites would get weird looks too because they would be out of place.

John, you do raise a good point - it doesn't seem to be exploring whether the black family is also prejudiced in any way.

I'm watching the latest show tonight and will get a review up by tomorrow.

#6 — April 3, 2006 @ 03:35AM — Ian

Rose's involvement in the all black poetry group is of course meant to explore the white person in all black experience, but my guess is the biggest reason that the show isn't going out of it's way to show "black on white racism" is just simple demographic percentages. As of 2002 census, Blacks represent less than 13% of the U.S. population. With 80% of the U.S. population being white, they're simply focusing on the black experience in a primarily white environment.

While the show does highlight some obvious stereotypes that feel staged, I think overall it is not that far off base. Some people experience racism first hand, some see it where there was no intent, some are openly racist only when with "like kind", some are stubbornly oblivious to it in all forms, and some try to sympathize with miniorities so badly it's embarrassingly racist. I think most white people are unconsciously oblivious to it, and the remainder are simply left wondering what can we do in our own lives to help, given all the mixed signals.

ian

#7 — April 6, 2006 @ 11:57AM — Josh


This show is terrible. It makes all white men look racist. I am a white male and i am offended by this show. Bruno is not every white man, but some people will watch this show and go see all white people think alike.

This show is an embarrassment. Its all about white people looking through black eyes, and this show was supposed to be a two way street.

But hey if you want a show that makes white people look like a bunch of out of touch idiots, then you have come to the write place.

#8 — April 6, 2006 @ 21:35PM — Dan

Interesting how my perception of the episode is so different from Mr. Butki's.

For instance, In the "white" bar, I thought Bruno and Carmen (in make-up) were treated reasonably despite Carmen, who seemed intent on provoking hostility.

Contrasting that with the African-American street gathering that sent Carmen (without make-up) into a hysterical sobbing fit because of the racial hostility she felt, it seemed, to me, that the more egregious racism was on the blacks.

For an instant, I thought Carmen was about to "see the light", until she angrily threatened to return by herself to confront them and perhaps force them to accept her.

Bruno seems to be the only one who gets it. Carmen is an obvious white guilt liberal basket case. Nick's parents are vehement racists, hell bent on encumbering Nick with their poison.

Although I empathize with Bruno. Nick is who I feel for the most. His parents are far too domineering and critical.

Consider the watch incident. It was HIS money. If he want's to throw away $150 on a bad choice, it should be his decision. That's how you learn. If instead, your parents embarrasingly force you to return it, because they see it as re-inforcing some stereotype that *they* are uncomfortable with, then it wasn't ever really *your* money to begin with.

Anyway, I think it's an interesting show. But I think it's going to be hard for the producers to shoe-horn their obviously pre-conceived bias of rampant white racism and abundant black victimhood into the series. I'm sure they'll do their liberal best, but it is a "reality" show.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/45502)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments