NEWS

The Bedford Diaries Rides the FCC Controversy Wave

Written by Diane Kristine
Published March 25, 2006

The show hasn't even been broadcast yet and the WB's The Bedford Diaries is already part of the controversial news about the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). This week, the US regulatory body levied fines on CBS's Without a Trace for a teen orgy scene that showed no naughty bits and that was part of a storyline emphasizing the need for parental supervision, while leaving Oprah unscathed for a show on teen sex parties that used explicit language to describe oral and anal sex.

The good news is that the networks are mad enough to fight the fines, in what The Progress and Freedom Foundation, for one, sees as a possible beginning of the end for federal regulation of broadcast content, regulation that protects viewers and listeners who haven't mastered the off button, the concepts of changing the channel or taking the television out of their children's bedrooms, or the V-Chip. From the PFF's blog:

"Broadcasters will have a strong case when they get the rules in court. The FCC has steadily increased the scope of its indecency enforcement policy over the past 15 years and created a regulatory regime that is about as clear as mud."

The Bedford Diaries is riding on the coattails of this news because it is currently available for viewing over the Internet in its uncut form, but the WB has announced that a censored version, clipped of brief shots of two women kissing and a woman opening her jeans, will be broadcast on Wednesday.

"They're intimidating the networks and levying these fines, so the networks are not sure of what they can or can't do," Bedford producer Barry Levinson said.

From CNN:

"We can't point the finger at the network," [Levinson] said. "The network is responding to governmental intimidation."

In a statement, the WB said it "takes its responsibility as a broadcast network very seriously and we have always been mindful of the FCC's indecency rules.

"While we believe that the previous version of The Bedford Diaries is in keeping with those rules, out of an abundance of caution, we decided to make some additional changes" to the first episode, the network said.

I don't quite buy the "blame the FCC" party line. Those particular cuts weren't dictated by the FCC, they were dictated by the network's fear of what the FCC might do. But the two cuts don't mirror the scenes the FCC objected to in the latest round of fines. Two women kissing? Yawn. The unzipping-the-jeans scene is a quick shot to suggest a woman about to masturbate, with no explicit visuals or audio accompanying it. And while most news articles are calling her a "girl," these are university students. Adults. And wait ... is masturbation bad again? There is definitely salacious content in The Bedford Diaries, but those two trims are either cowardice or genius.

page 1 | 2

Diane is a publications manager who's addicted to television, movies, and books and justifies her pop culture obsessions by writing about them for Blogcritics. She also runs the TV, Eh? website, a compilation of news and information about Canadian television series.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
The Bedford Diaries Rides the FCC Controversy Wave
Published: March 25, 2006
Type: News
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Television, Video: News, Video: Film and TV Business, Culture: Media
Writer: Diane Kristine
Diane Kristine's BC Writer page
Diane Kristine's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Diane Kristine
Video: Television
Video: News
Video: Film and TV Business
Culture: Media
All Video Articles
Diane Kristine's personal weblog
All News articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — March 25, 2006 @ 15:29PM — Matt Paprocki [URL]

The PTC seriously needs to be stopped. This is getting out of hand. They seem to be at the heart of most of this "controversey."

South Park handled it so well too:

"We got 60 calls, and each one of them is worth a billion people. That means 60 billion people were offended!"

#2 — March 25, 2006 @ 21:52PM — Dick b Enumauph

WHO ARE THESE PEOPLE??!@#*!!??!
IF SOMEONE DOESN'T LIKE WHATS"S ON THE TELEVISION,CHANGE IT,..GENIUS YOU WATCH WHAT YOU WANT,AND SO WILL EVERYONE ELSE....LEAVE US ALONE!... YOU HINEYHEAD U!
SINCERELY..MY GAY LEFT NUT
JUST A JOKE:> I'M NO FAAG. Not that there's anything wrong with that!

#3 — March 25, 2006 @ 22:14PM — Diane Kristine

Well, the advocacy groups are part of the issue, but it's the FCC - the US government - who are doing the damage here by agreeing with them and the other individuals who complain. And yet their indecency rules are arbitrary, inconsistent, and can't touch what the WB puts on their website as opposed to the airwaves.

A Russell Reasearch survey showed that 8 percent of parents favoured government regulation of TV content. If that's accurate, maybe the other 92 percent should think about speaking up.

#4 — March 26, 2006 @ 07:51AM — Paul

Diane I couldn't agree more. That is the problem with most of the protests and law suit's these days. Its always about a minority or a handful of people being offended. With these groups, if one person is offended then everyone else needs to change their actions. Its a bunch of bull and the other 92% does need to wake up.

#5 — June 26, 2006 @ 16:31PM — draculavillkillu

this show probably wont be on air that long. i cant see a guy watching it. well i hope a guy wouldnt.i dont think they ll get enough of an audience from woman. so whats it matter who cares. if you dont like the sexual content dont watch it and it will be taken off the air

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/45484)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments