Movie Review: Lajos Koltai's Fateless: Death and the Children
Published March 22, 2006
In all these ways Fateless avoids the romantic mistakes of Roman Polanski's The Pianist (2002) in which the filmmakers expect us to be swept away by the travails of their exceptional Jewish hero, who escapes from a forced-work detail and goes into hiding in a vacant apartment, only to be trapped there after his protector stops bringing supplies. What many critics considered the high point — when the famished concert pianist moves his fingers precisely but soundlessly over a keyboard, trying to hang on to what made his pre-War life meaningful — I found downright tacky. The fact that a victim of the Nazis is a great pianist doesn't make his suffering meaningfully worse or different. And the Holocaust doesn't need poetic heightening, any more than it needed the gaudy melodramatic heightening of the mother forced to choose which of her two children would go straight to the gas chamber in Sophie's Choice (1982).
Roberto Benigni's Life Is Beautiful
These are all reasons why I skipped Life Is Beautiful (1997) — I don't want to be asked to admire the specialness of someone's Holocaust experience. I watched the movie recently, however, and I have to say, if you're going to get the Holocaust wrong, this is the way to do it.
Benigni plays Guido Orefice, a Jewish-Italian waiter in the late 1930s who is a romantic clown. A classic slapstick protagonist to the extent of constantly getting into scrapes, Guido has the gift of turning every hitch in his experience to advantage. Mishaps aren't humiliating to Guido, as they were to the perpetual adolescents played by Harold Lloyd, because Benigni attributes the physical resourcefulness of the silent slapstick actors to Guido himself. This gives the character a buoyancy that allows him to make life a never-ending acrobatic stunt in which he just keeps shifting and persisting — and talking — until he lands on his feet. Benigni is not a great physical performer but he is peskily winning, and no slapstick star of feature films since Raymond Griffith has had less of a penchant for sad-clown masochism, which is key to his pulling off this Holocaust comedy.
As a director Benigni thinks of setting in terms of potential gags, involving bicycles, house keys, hats, eggs, steering wheels, i.e., standard slapstick props, and he runs the gags together with a craftsmanlike fluency not seen since the silent days (with the exception of Jacques Tati). At the same time, as a star Benigni has the winsomeness of the perpetual juveniles Lloyd and Keaton but also some of Chaplin's least sentimental qualities. In a scene in which Guido talks a patron who entered the restaurant after the kitchen was closed into ordering a meal that's already been prepared, for instance, he shows the aplomb of the guttersnipe Chaplin seizing opportunity; at other times he is sparky with Chaplin's effrontery in refusing to take bureaucratic or police power seriously. In addition, Benigni has a motormouth on him that gives him some of Jerry Lewis's sheer force. All the influences come together in a scruffy, unsinkable goofball who can believably win the beautiful, wealthy, gentile schoolteacher Dora (Nicoletta Braschi) from her pompous-bureaucrat fiancé. Guido calls Dora "principessa" and summons all the alertness, brass, and luck at his command to make her realize how magical she appears through his eyes. Guido himself is not much to look at but you can see why Dora can't resist him.
- Movie Review: Lajos Koltai's Fateless: Death and the Children
- Published: March 22, 2006
- Type: Review
- Section: Video
- Filed Under: Video: Art House, Video: Classics, Video: Comedy, Video: Drama, Video: Foreign Language
- Writer: Alan Dale
- Alan Dale's BC Writer page
- Alan Dale's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us













Temporal posted a thoughtful blog entry at Baithak about this review. I posted a response which I repeat here (with a few modifications):
Thank you for your reference to my review of Fateless. I consider "involved, wonderfully mesmerizing" high compliments.
All mass murders are to be deplored equally, of course. The Nazi genocide of the European Jews stands out, I think, b/c of a combination of a number of factors that apply only singly or in smaller combinations to some of the others you mention:
1. The European Jews were killed not b/c of anything they had done or believed (even unbelieving Jews were killed) but b/c of who they were.
2. They were killed with industrial efficiency pursuant to an official gov't policy in specially built extermination camps. (The 20 million dead Soviets you mention were military and civilian casualties of warfare and its attendant privations, in an underdeveloped economy run by a pathological butcher.)
3. The deportation and murder of the European Jews required international governmental collaboration.
4. The victims were drawn from territories ranging from the Balkans to the Baltic, from Russia and Poland to France and Italy.
5. The number of the murdered is greater, both in terms of the head count (6 million) and the percentage of the targeted population exterminated (75%).
6. The European Jews were singled out and murdered even in places such as Germany, Austria, Holland, and France after they had attained amazing degrees of professional and economic success and social integration.
7. The murder of the European Jews occurred in what had been advanced western democracies. The suffering of Kampucheans and Rwandans is no less disturbing and moving, but it is less surprising.
8. The Nazi murder of Jews was only the latest, most concentrated and coordinated effort in a long history of bloody persecution.