Blogcritics Has March Madness Fever, And The Only Prescription Is...
Published March 21, 2006
Top Seeds Look to Make This the Craziest March Yet
Posted by Adam Hoff
Never before have all the 1 seeds reached the Final Four. Are we headed for a tourney first?
March Madness: Major Achievement for Missouri Valley Conference
Posted by Adam Hoff
The Missouri Valley Conference performed even better than you think during the NCAA Tournament's opening weekend.
Ohio State Ousted From The Dance
Posted by M.D. Sandwasher
My #2 seeded Ohio State Buckeyes fell to the 7th-seeded Georgetown Hoyas.
Bradley 'Brave' Enough To Reach The Final Four
Posted by AJ Vaynerchuk
The Bradley Braves have that vibe. That Final Four vibe.
How Sweet (16) It Is To Predict Bradley Beating Pittsburgh
Posted by Matthew T. Sussman
I don't want to take anything away from Bradley's victories against Kansas and Pittsburgh, but the real winner is me.
Obscure Statistics From March Madness, Spring Training, And The NBA
Posted by AJ Vaynerchuk
Not everyone can search deep into the cool stuff of sports each night, but I have the time!
The Ramble: March Madness, First Round Edition
Posted by Sal Marinello
It's the time of year when my wife wishes we didn't have DirecTv. Thank God I pay the bills.
March Madness: A Running Diary of Day One
Posted by AJ Vaynerchuk
The up-and-down Pacific/Boston College game was a great preview for the rest of this tournament.
Clip Talk: Free NCAA March Madness Video From CBS
Posted by Barry Gold
I was Number 39,061, but within minutes, I was in.
March Madness: Minnesota's The Most Intriguing Region
Posted by AJ Vaynerchuk
This region is the most exciting part of the men's tournament. 'Nova and Ohio State will have trouble making
NCAA Tournament: Why All No. 1 Seeds Will Lose (And Other Upsets)
Posted by Matthew T. Sussman
Duke? Memphis? UConn? Villanova? They'll all lose to Southern, Oral Roberts, Albany, and either Monmouth or Hampton.
- Blogcritics Has March Madness Fever, And The Only Prescription Is...
- Published: March 21, 2006
- Type: News
- Section: Sports
- Filed Under: Culture: Administrative, Sports: Basketball, Sports: College
- Writer: Matthew T. Sussman
- Matthew T. Sussman's BC Writer page
- Matthew T. Sussman's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
everybody knows that the prescription for a fever is more cowbell....
Correction to your correction. Only 32 teams set out to win the tournament, because no 9-16 seeds have ever won the national championship.

Matt Sussman is the former sports editor of BC Magazine and also writes for 






Correction, and I'm not referring to your incorrect pick of No 1's losing, 65 teams did not "set out to win the most exciting tournament of the year". The 64th and 65th teams played against each other to see who would take a beating in the first round of the tournament.
I hope they make enough money on it because the play-in game is an embarrassment.