INTERVIEW

Interview with Jeff Latas, Democrat for Congress In Arizona's CD8

Written by Michael D. Bryan
Published March 21, 2006
page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15

We have to, as a nation, demonstrate what real civilization should encompass, and that means dialogue with different cultures, it means respecting different cultures, and understanding what their motivations are. One we start sticking our nose in the business of Islamic law and fundamentalist governments we might see in the Middle East, it's only going to inflame that region, because they look at us affecting their values as well. So we need to go back to a Christian love model - do unto others - and show we don't want to hurt them, we want to respect them, and find our what they want in return. If that's just to go away; we go away.

M: What about rule of law, and torture, etc.?

J: What we are doing in Gitmo inflames the rest of the world to no end. We have a set of laws we follow, yet we are treating these people as if there were no laws. That is not what this country is about; we are a country of laws. And we ought to figure out we're going to give those people their day in court.

Torture does not work. That's proven. We've had these people for three years and we're still thinking we can get information out of them. To me, that just doesn't make any sense. Torture just doesn't work.

M: What's your opinion of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict?

J: Six months ago I thought there was good progress being made. I hope to see that progress continue. Obviously, with Hamas taking control, and Sharon out of the picture, I hope both groups maintain their dialogue. I hope their problems don't escalate into more violence in the future.

M: What can Congress do to assist in the peace process?

J: We don't deal with terrorists. So until Hams renounces terrorism, we can't deal with them. However, that does push them into a situation where they are going to make deals with Iran, Syria, Russia. We are pushing them toward the more fundamentalist side. I think we could reach out to Hamas in direct talks in the correct circumstances and recognize that they are now the legitimate government of Palestine.

M: Should we conditionalize aid to Israel on progress on a settlement with the Palestinians?

J: Possibly. We do support Israel with a considerable amount of aid  and that irritates the Arab people. It doesn't look fair. Israel has to behave themselves too. Israel did get out of hand in 2001-2002. They came down with an iron fist. Sharon was seeing that tactic was not going work and started to pull back, and withdraw some from the West Bank, things actually got better. We have to consider how much of this business between Israel and Palestine is actually US business. That is between two other states, and us getting in the middle of that doesn't make us look like a good actor either. Because is we favor one side over the other, it's a lose-lose situation.

page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Interview with Jeff Latas, Democrat for Congress In Arizona's CD8
Published: March 21, 2006
Type: Interview
Section: Politics
Writer: Michael D. Bryan
Michael D. Bryan's BC Writer page
Michael D. Bryan's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Michael D. Bryan
All Politics Articles
All Interview articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — March 21, 2006 @ 04:44AM — Eric Berlin [URL]

Great interview Michael! Is there a website where people can learn more about / contact / support Latas' campaign?

#2 — March 21, 2006 @ 09:15AM — Dave Nalle [URL]

1977-1980 we reduced our oil requirements from the Middle East by 87% at the same time the GDP went up 27%, so it's obviously healthy for this economy to get off of oil.

He must have forgotten the average 12% yearly inflation rate during that period which went along with that GDP growth, which effectively reduced it to a -21% rate of growth.

Dave

#3 — March 21, 2006 @ 15:05PM — Michael D. Bryan [URL]

I neglected to include his homepage. Thanks for pointing out the oversight.

#4 — March 21, 2006 @ 16:30PM — Dave Nalle [URL]

Michael, you could go back and edit that into the article at an appropriate place.

Dave

#5 — March 27, 2006 @ 00:53AM — Dwight D. Leister: Chair: Committee To Elect:T. Mae leister:First Vice Treasurer [URL]

I too share similar opinions about the F-22 V Joint Strike Fighter and alot of other systems to numerous to mention.

I recall while in High School,1959 to 1963, I wore a Hughes Missile Pin of The Falcon on my shirt every day, and being called to the cafeteria with other Hughes Families because Hughes paid a direct subsidy to the school for my being in attendance.

The same is true of the many good aircraft and systems that did not get off the ground because of "Favorite Defense Contractors inside the Pentagon," as was Boeing, favored by Dwight Eisenhower, and it got the contracts over Lockeed and Martin and Convair and many others that had a superior aircraft but lost to Politics.

General Spots the first Air Force General and whom broke off from The Army ,then called Army-Air Force, was a good friend of my Family and was born in Boyertown,P.A. where I was Born. Since the Town is so small everyone knew everyone else,and in the First and Second World War with Spots in Command we had alot of options open to us.

Hughes alone has Government Contracts now over a TRILLION Dollars, Iam a member of Davis Monthan Air Force Lodge #105 and have spent alot of time in the Bone Yard now and back in the 1960's as I hauled out 250 B-26's to be refitted and sent to Madam Nue and her Air Force in Viet Nam under The Kennedy Administration.

For anyone who wants to see their Tax Dollars , visit the Bone Yard to see everything from B-1 Bombers back in time to your favorite aircraft,all coated with white sun guard.

The point that my Father always made as he was stationed at Langley to Hughes was that when a contract was complete the JIG was Destroyed so that no more production of PARTS or THE AIRCRAFT could continue, this forced special jobs to make more parts from new JIGS that most engineers had a hard time matching the tolerances down to the original and the parts did not fit or work in many systems SCRAPPING many thousands of parts that had to be made over and over again,then if a repair order was ahead of schedule the parts were scrapped on purpose to continue the contract.

With this in mind beware of Politicians whom are connected to the Pentagon or its Contractors because you will experience Haliburton all over again.

#6 — March 27, 2006 @ 08:45AM — Dave Nalle [URL]

Most of the complaints you raise about incompetent and inefficient management of the aircraft parts by the military would be true regardless of who built the planes. You make the mistaken assumption that any one of those aircraft contractors was less corrupt than the others, and even more that Boeing was corrupt just because they were the one that got the contract. If Hughes or Douglas or Convair or whoever had gotten the contract you'd be complaining about them today.

Dave

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/45300)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments