INTERVIEW

Interview with Jeff Latas, Democrat for Congress In Arizona's CD8

Written by Michael D. Bryan
Published March 21, 2006
page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15

M: What committees do you intend to lobby to be on?

J: Obviously, I would be interested in being on the military affairs committee. But as for lobbying, Energy is one of the places I'd really love to go. That's where my calling really is, because getting off of oil affects so many things. I would also look at getting into environmental issues.

CONSTITUTION

M: What's your view of the NSA domestic surveillance scandal?

J: We really don't know exactly what has happened. So I reserve my opinion a little, however, the idea that my telephone calls can be monitored just because I'm talking to someone overseas is obviously an invasion of my privacy without due process being done by getting a warrant to do it. I think at this point it needs to stop. My understanding is they haven't caught any terrorist suspects by doing this monitoring. Being in the Pentagon as I was I know there's a lot of things that can't be shared with the public, and there might be some things regarding this program that are too sensitive for us to know at this point, but publicly I don't think anyone's been caught as a result.

M: How do you feel about the Senate and House both voting not to investigate the program?

J: That bothers me. That was a party run vote that when along party lines. I think it ought to be investigated, you bet.

M; Would you vote for impeachment of Bush, Cheney, or other Administration officials and under what circumstances?

J: That question's obviously coming up and I will say that HR635 [Conyer's bill to initiate an impeachment inquiry], I would support that at this point. Impeachment's a touchy issue. It is damaging to our government, whether it's a Democrat or Republican. But if laws have been broken, it doesn't matter who you are, you should be held responsible.

[Jeff also signed on Russ Feingold's resolution to censure President Bush as a citizen co-sponsor]

DOMESTIC

M: How do you propose to incentivize the market to change over from oil to other sources of energy and feedstocks?

J: We need to give efficiency-indexed tax incentives to individuals for solar cells and high-efficiency vehicles. We also have to give tax breaks or subsidies incentives to industry to develop alternatives and do R&D. We can also mandate government purchases and investments meet efficiency targets. We can make grants to universities to help develop new technology, for instance hydrogen from solar energy. Here in Arizona we can really boost our economy with alternative energy such as development of hydrogen plants without using fossil fuels: solar or otherwise. We need to figure out how to make conversion of energy to hydrogen storage more efficient and from alternate sources. Right now it's about 1:1 with fossil fuels, so that isn't really helpful.

M: The 800 pound gorilla is private finance - wall street, banks and pension funds - needs incentives to invest in these new technologies. How do we get financial capital out of the rut?

page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Interview with Jeff Latas, Democrat for Congress In Arizona's CD8
Published: March 21, 2006
Type: Interview
Section: Politics
Writer: Michael D. Bryan
Michael D. Bryan's BC Writer page
Michael D. Bryan's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Michael D. Bryan
All Politics Articles
All Interview articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — March 21, 2006 @ 04:44AM — Eric Berlin [URL]

Great interview Michael! Is there a website where people can learn more about / contact / support Latas' campaign?

#2 — March 21, 2006 @ 09:15AM — Dave Nalle [URL]

1977-1980 we reduced our oil requirements from the Middle East by 87% at the same time the GDP went up 27%, so it's obviously healthy for this economy to get off of oil.

He must have forgotten the average 12% yearly inflation rate during that period which went along with that GDP growth, which effectively reduced it to a -21% rate of growth.

Dave

#3 — March 21, 2006 @ 15:05PM — Michael D. Bryan [URL]

I neglected to include his homepage. Thanks for pointing out the oversight.

#4 — March 21, 2006 @ 16:30PM — Dave Nalle [URL]

Michael, you could go back and edit that into the article at an appropriate place.

Dave

#5 — March 27, 2006 @ 00:53AM — Dwight D. Leister: Chair: Committee To Elect:T. Mae leister:First Vice Treasurer [URL]

I too share similar opinions about the F-22 V Joint Strike Fighter and alot of other systems to numerous to mention.

I recall while in High School,1959 to 1963, I wore a Hughes Missile Pin of The Falcon on my shirt every day, and being called to the cafeteria with other Hughes Families because Hughes paid a direct subsidy to the school for my being in attendance.

The same is true of the many good aircraft and systems that did not get off the ground because of "Favorite Defense Contractors inside the Pentagon," as was Boeing, favored by Dwight Eisenhower, and it got the contracts over Lockeed and Martin and Convair and many others that had a superior aircraft but lost to Politics.

General Spots the first Air Force General and whom broke off from The Army ,then called Army-Air Force, was a good friend of my Family and was born in Boyertown,P.A. where I was Born. Since the Town is so small everyone knew everyone else,and in the First and Second World War with Spots in Command we had alot of options open to us.

Hughes alone has Government Contracts now over a TRILLION Dollars, Iam a member of Davis Monthan Air Force Lodge #105 and have spent alot of time in the Bone Yard now and back in the 1960's as I hauled out 250 B-26's to be refitted and sent to Madam Nue and her Air Force in Viet Nam under The Kennedy Administration.

For anyone who wants to see their Tax Dollars , visit the Bone Yard to see everything from B-1 Bombers back in time to your favorite aircraft,all coated with white sun guard.

The point that my Father always made as he was stationed at Langley to Hughes was that when a contract was complete the JIG was Destroyed so that no more production of PARTS or THE AIRCRAFT could continue, this forced special jobs to make more parts from new JIGS that most engineers had a hard time matching the tolerances down to the original and the parts did not fit or work in many systems SCRAPPING many thousands of parts that had to be made over and over again,then if a repair order was ahead of schedule the parts were scrapped on purpose to continue the contract.

With this in mind beware of Politicians whom are connected to the Pentagon or its Contractors because you will experience Haliburton all over again.

#6 — March 27, 2006 @ 08:45AM — Dave Nalle [URL]

Most of the complaints you raise about incompetent and inefficient management of the aircraft parts by the military would be true regardless of who built the planes. You make the mistaken assumption that any one of those aircraft contractors was less corrupt than the others, and even more that Boeing was corrupt just because they were the one that got the contract. If Hughes or Douglas or Convair or whoever had gotten the contract you'd be complaining about them today.

Dave

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/45300)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments