<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on Interview with Jeff Latas, Democrat for Congress In Arizona's CD8</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 08:45:46 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Dave Nalle</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/03/21/021126.php#comment-341117</link>
<description>Most of the complaints you raise about incompetent and inefficient management of the aircraft parts by the military would be true regardless of who built the planes.  You make the mistaken assumption that any one of those aircraft contractors was less corrupt than the others, and even more that Boeing was corrupt just because they were the one that got the contract.  If Hughes or Douglas or Convair or whoever had gotten the contract you&#039;d be complaining about them today.

Dave</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">341117@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 08:45:46 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Dwight D. Leister: Chair: Committee To Elect:T. Mae leister:First Vice Treasurer</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/03/21/021126.php#comment-341022</link>
<description>I too share similar opinions about the F-22 V Joint Strike Fighter and alot of other systems to numerous to mention. 

I recall while in High School,1959 to 1963, I wore a Hughes Missile Pin of The Falcon on my shirt every day, and being called to the cafeteria with other Hughes Families because Hughes paid a direct subsidy to the school for my being in attendance.

The same is true of the many good aircraft and systems that did not get off the ground because of &quot;Favorite Defense Contractors inside the Pentagon,&quot; as was Boeing, favored by Dwight Eisenhower, and it got the contracts over Lockeed and Martin and Convair and many others that had a superior aircraft but lost to Politics.

General Spots the first Air Force General and whom broke off from The Army ,then called Army-Air Force, was a good friend of my Family and was born in Boyertown,P.A. where I was Born. Since the Town is so small everyone knew everyone else,and in the First and Second World War with Spots in Command we had alot of options open to us.

Hughes alone has Government Contracts now over a TRILLION Dollars, Iam a member of Davis Monthan Air Force Lodge #105 and have spent alot of time in the Bone Yard now and back in the 1960&#039;s as I hauled out 250 B-26&#039;s to be refitted and sent to Madam Nue and her Air Force in Viet Nam under The Kennedy Administration.

For anyone who wants to see their Tax Dollars , visit the Bone Yard to see everything from B-1 Bombers back in time to your favorite aircraft,all coated with white sun guard.

The point that my Father always made as he was stationed at Langley to Hughes was that when a contract was complete the JIG was Destroyed so that no more production of PARTS or THE AIRCRAFT could continue, this forced special jobs to make more parts from new JIGS that most engineers had a hard time matching the tolerances down to the original and the parts did not fit or work in many systems SCRAPPING many thousands of parts that had to be made over and over again,then if a repair order was ahead of schedule the parts were scrapped on purpose to continue the contract.

With this in mind beware of Politicians whom are connected to the Pentagon or its Contractors because you will experience Haliburton all over again.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">341022@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 00:53:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Dave Nalle</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/03/21/021126.php#comment-337839</link>
<description>Michael, you could go back and edit that into the article at an appropriate place.

Dave</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">337839@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 16:30:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Michael D. Bryan</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/03/21/021126.php#comment-337797</link>
<description>I neglected to include &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jefflatas.com&quot;&gt;his homepage&lt;/a&gt;. Thanks for pointing out the oversight.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">337797@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 15:05:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Dave Nalle</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/03/21/021126.php#comment-337653</link>
<description>&lt;i&gt;1977-1980 we reduced our oil requirements from the Middle East by 87% at the same time the GDP went up 27%, so it&#039;s obviously healthy for this economy to get off of oil.&lt;/i&gt;

He must have forgotten the average 12% yearly inflation rate during that period which went along with that GDP growth, which effectively reduced it to a -21% rate of growth.

Dave</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">337653@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 09:15:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Berlin</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/03/21/021126.php#comment-337592</link>
<description>Great interview Michael! Is there a website where people can learn more about / contact / support Latas&#039; campaign?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">337592@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 04:44:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>