OPINION

I'm Confused About...Politicians

Written by Mark Schannon
Published March 19, 2006

Entry number two in the "I'm Confused About" series.

Politicians. It's often said that to know them is to hate them; to watch government in action is like watching sausage being made by the three wicked witches in Macbeth who haven't washed their hands since the beginning of time. And to participate in the political process is equivalent to eating the sausages with your bare hands after you've slopped the pigs, baled the hay, and milked the cows.

The problem is that I've known lots of politicans. Starting way back when the world was young...or, rather I was young. What confuses me is that I've liked most of them — I'd say the vast majority even. Conservative, liberal, Republican, Democrat, Independent, Bipolar, Alcoholic, sexual deviants — the whole bunch.

Individually, I've found honor and decency, thoughtfulness, and a willingness to consider various points of view. Why is it, then, that collectively, it's like watching monkeys in a zoo?

A few years ago, I was on a private jet flying to some conservative educational conference (I was client hunting if you must know), and I met a religious conservative Republican congressman who'd promised his constituents that he'd only serve three terms. His third term was half over, and he was honestly and sincerely trapped in what he saw as a moral dilemma. His promise — his word — carried great moral weight, and yet he realized that it had been a dumb promise by someone who knew nothing about the Byzantine maze that is D.C.

Three terms — six years — hell, you barely learn how to find the congressional gym. He believed he had so much more to offer, but how could he go back on his word? He and I agreed on just about nothing politically, but he won my respect because he wasn't just mouthing platitudes, he was sincerely torn and distressed. Of course the story would be a lot better if I knew the ending, but I don't know whether he ran again or not. Oh well, that's not the point.

The point is that there's something in the process of government — or perhaps it occurs when three or more people come together to accomplish something — that turns decent people into political hacks.

page 1 | 2
Crisis/risk/issues management and communications and PR consultant, free-lance writer, aspiring pundit and author. Blogcritics.org asst. ed, politics. Wanted to set world on fire, but bride won't let me play with matches, so I'm counting on upcoming, someday, perhaps novels to accomplish through awe and wild acclaim what arson didn't. Also, yes, I take my meds regularly. Please check out my lit blog, No Blank Pages
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
I'm Confused About...Politicians
Published: March 19, 2006
Type: Opinion
Section: Politics
Filed Under: Culture: Humor and Satire, Politics: Elections and Candidates, Politics: Government, Politics: Policy
Writer: Mark Schannon
Mark Schannon's BC Writer page
Mark Schannon's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Mark Schannon
Culture: Humor and Satire
Politics: Elections and Candidates
Politics: Government
Politics: Policy
All Politics Articles
All Opinion articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — March 19, 2006 @ 08:52AM — Ebony Ghost

You hit the nail on the head when you said it's our fault. We the people allow it and we get what we deserve. Much of what they do is downright criminal and the people just scoff it off as politics as usual. Nobody wants to recognize that money crossing state and district lines for the purpose of influencing elections is election tampering. What part of "lobbying" doesn't involve the offering and taking of bribes? (The absolute best ROI of a "campaign contribution" is one that makes it illegal for anyone to choose not to purchase your product)

If every Democrat and every Republican lost every election for the next 12 years, the entire planet would be a better place to live. But that's not going to happen. Under the "lesser of" guise, everyone will line up and do everything they can to ensure that evil pervails. For some reason, the people insist on returning that lying pack of thieves to the halls of power every chance they get. Once there, the first thing they do is take an oath to uphold the Constitution. The second thing they do is toss the oath AND the Constitution out the nearest window.

It's only going to get worse. The tendency to micromanage the personal decisions of people in a "free" country has them running out of stuff to legislate. Next on the horizon, laws affecting citizens of other countries within their own boarders. If any of my friends read this they may not recognize the name, but they will know the phrase... poor us.

#2 — March 19, 2006 @ 12:51PM — Mark Schannon [URL]

I can't disagree with your despair, but, with all due respect, you missed my point. Individually, these folks aren't bad people. It's only when they get together as Congress or The Administration that weird things happen.

Maybe it's something in the water or air.
Maybe the buildings have "sick building syndrome."
Maybe this is the real plot by al-Qida to destroy us.

That's why I'm confused...

In Jamesons Veritas

#3 — March 21, 2006 @ 09:33AM — Maurice

Nobody explains these things better than Walter E. Williams. Here is
a link
.

#4 — March 21, 2006 @ 12:37PM — Mark Schannon [URL]

Fascinating article, and I love the proposed legislation at the end. You should do an article just on that!

Thanks.

In Jamesons Veritas

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/45194)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments