<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on TV Review: <i>The Daily Show</i> (March 15)</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2006 13:36:36 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Scott Butki</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/03/17/004546.php#comment-336444</link>
<description>I&#039;ll be out of town next week as I learn about diversity by working in Baltimore schools so you&#039;re going to have to go a week without my summaries. I&#039;ll tape them, though, and may write up reviews later if I get some time.



Any feedback on these reviews and summaries is welcome - I&#039;m still choosing my voice and style as you may have noticed.

My goal is to make them funnier next time, instead of just trying to describe why the show is funny.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">336444@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2006 13:36:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Scott Butki</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/03/17/004546.php#comment-336290</link>
<description>Wel said, you two.
I agree - hunting is one thing but this canned hunting seems like a whole different, um, creature.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">336290@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 21:58:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Brent</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/03/17/004546.php#comment-336083</link>
<description>I&#039;m not a hunter but I don&#039;t object to hunting - real hunting. Real hunting involves getting up at the crack of dawn sitting in a duck blind or walking through a field and shooting your duck or your goose as it comes over, or your pheasant breaks cover. It involves the animal having a chance to escape or survive. It involves caring for the environment because if you don&#039;t the animals disappear. Some of the most vocal conservationists (in terms of not wanting wild habitats destroyed) I know are hunters. What Cheney and other &quot;canned&quot; hunt participants are doing isn&#039;t hunting, it&#039;s the slaughter of animals  as surely as if you chained a deer to a fence and let a paying customer shoot it from 15 feet away.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">336083@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 12:55:27 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Bliffle</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/03/17/004546.php#comment-336040</link>
<description>Dick Cheney is NOT a hunter, he is a killer.

I started hunting when I was 14. Those of us who were real hunters knew well the killers we saw in the field and we avoided their vicinity because they were so careless and often drunk: we were concerned about being shot. Often, they had out-of-state license plates, new equipment, fancy weapons and made an unseemly amount of noise. One time my buddy and I watched in hilarity as a group of them crept along the ground stealthily toward a flock of coots sitting on a lake and popped away stupidly at the inedible birds.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">336040@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 11:10:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Scott Butki</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/03/17/004546.php#comment-335961</link>
<description>I&#039;m curious what others - especially hunters - thought of this episode.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">335961@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 08:05:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>