Oscars: Thoughts On Paul Haggis
Published March 06, 2006

Paul Haggis discussing screenwriting with Tamara Strauss
Originally uploaded by Steve Rhodes.
I doubt when Paul Haggis won an award at the San Francisco International Film Festival and had a dialogue with Tamara Strauss about screenwriting last May he imagined Crash would win an Oscar for best picture.
He talked about his career in television (one of his early jobs in Hollywood was writing one of the storylines on an episode of Love Boat and both he and George Clooney worked on Facts of Life). I'd really liked Thirtysomething and EZ Streets.
Million Dollar Baby, which he developed and wrote the screenplay for, had recently won an Oscar for best picture. He talked about how one producer had wanted Arnold to star, and that he was so relieved when Clint Eastwood agreed to be involved that he gave up his dream of directing it.
Plus by that time he knew he'd be able to make Crash, which he screened that afternoon. I'll admit that I wanted to like it (because I really liked Haggis) more than I did. It had great performances and dealt with an important issue.
But I didn't think the overlapping stories worked as well as in say an Altman film or Me and You and Everyone We Know (which while very different was probably the closest thing to a perfect film last year). It sometimes seemed too much of a stretch to stitch them all together in the way he did.
I have the DVD (which now doesn't cost much more than a movie ticket) and I'll have to watch Crash again. And I do look forward to the TV series which will be based on it and future projects from Haggis.
He spoke about Crash on NPR last April.
More photos of Paul Haggis.
- Oscars: Thoughts On Paul Haggis
- Published: March 06, 2006
- Type: Opinion
- Section: Video
- Filed Under: Video: News
- Writer: Steve Rhodes
- Steve Rhodes's BC Writer page
- Steve Rhodes's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
I was also very pleasantly surprised (as was Jack Nicholson!) that Crash won.
I have seen it 3 times now and it is just as gutwrenching each time. The performances are powerful almost to a person, the characters are complicated, the editing and cinematography are excellant, and the humanity (both beautiful and ugly) of each character comes through very strongly.
I did think it was sad that Don Cheadle was not in attendance. This was his triumph as much as anyone else's. He is one of those actors that years from now will come to be appreciated much more than he is currently.
Oscar is just an awards show, nothing more and nothing less. Winning the awards does not mean it is the best picture. There is no objectivity in judging the quality of art. In this material emphasized, consuming society, illusion is being created. There's nothing to be excited or for that matter, depressed about this kind of just one more awards show. In fact, the nomination itself - for the best picture category, does not fully make sense to begin with. There are many more superior films - if one must compare - than these five nominated films. Who gives the right to nominate films they have done, anyways...
Most importantly, Oscar is nothing more than pretty much domestic awards show, it does not even consider to look elsewhere to find truly good films(from all over the world). It just nominates English speaking films and their choices are always disappointing in many ways. Once again, it is a show, nothing more than that.







I was actually quite pleased that Crash won Best Picture. I thought, as far as most movies with many storylines stitched together these days, Crash was above them. (I haven't yet seen You and Me and Everyone We Know, but I've met the filmmaker and she is quite cool). The separate storylines made sense and weaved together well, unlike Syriana where I didn't really care about a single story or how they would come together.