OPINION

Oscar Analysis: The Big Finale

Written by Film School Rejects
Published March 05, 2006

So much can be said about all of the nominees in each category recognized this year by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, but none are more controversial or compelling as the films and directors nominated in the two biggest categories of the affair. The nominees for Best Picture and Best Director are in many ways paralleled in both the fact that no Best Picture nominee's man at the helm was left behind when it was time to make nominations for Directing achievement, and the fact that each film has the very distinct touch of its director. In the world of film there is no such thing as a great film with a mediocre director, only great films directed by great men. And that is a theory that could be used as the driving force of justification for the following nominations:

BEST ACHIEVEMENT IN DIRECTING

It has often been said that every film's success begins and ends with the director. The producer secures finances and manages the money, the cinematographer chooses the right lighting and camera angle, and the actors all deliver their best performance; but the only role that supersedes all of the aforementioned duties is that of the director. A great director is neither seen nor heard by audiences, but their presence is undoubtedly felt. They are the ones whose interpretation of the story is what is played out before our eyes, either for our enjoyment or otherwise. And it is only the most elite of this field that cause us to stop as we exit the theater and say to ourselves, "Wow, that was one hell of a ride."

Such is the case with this year's nominees. There is the very A-List contingent of the group, which includes the incomparable genius of Steven Spielberg, the off-beat but visionary style of Ang Lee and the sizzling hot late-blooming talent of Paul Haggis. The rest of the list is comprised of veritable newcomers. Prior to being at the helm of Capote, Bennett Miller had previously only directed one film. The native New Yorker's limited experience in the mainstream of Hollywood did not detract, though, from his ability to immortalize another great New Yorker in Truman Capote. And last but not least there is the wonder of George Clooney. Here is a man whose acting career has made him a household name that is often associated with cheeky humor, witty dramatic satire, and a list of junior varsity action flicks (Three Kings and The Peacemaker come to mind.) But his newfound excellence in the realm of directing is not only a welcome surprise, but it displays a much unknown genius that people did not know existed within Clooney.

page 1 | 2 | 3
Film School RejectsFilm School Rejects is the world's best forum for aspiring film critics. Every day we deliver the most insightful reviews, news and commentary on the world of film from the best critics that you've never heard of! Want to become part of the FSR team? See how by clicking here.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Oscar Analysis: The Big Finale
Published: March 05, 2006
Type: Opinion
Section: Video
Writer: Film School Rejects
Film School Rejects's BC Writer page
Film School Rejects's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Film School Rejects
All Video Articles
Film School Rejects's personal weblog
All Opinion articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — March 6, 2006 @ 07:06AM — Bo McDowell

Just learned the results of the last night's Oscar and frankly, I feel lost to have learned that Crash won the best picture.

I have seen both of the pictures (Crash and Brokeback Mountain) and did not have to hesitate for a second to know which one of those two is a far superior movie than the other. If one is really honest with oneself, one will Know that Brokeback Mountain was the movie which should have won the best picture last night.

I won't be the only one feeling cheated at the news.

Regards

#2 — March 6, 2006 @ 09:13AM — Jet in Columbus

Brokeback Mountain should've won big time, and I can think of only one reason why it didn't.
The religious right started a campaign to call Hollywood overtly liberal and to accuse it of pushing a homosexual agenda.
To prove them wrong, Hollywood cowards snuck back into the closet, and slammed the door on a truly artistic achievement.

Having seen all five of the nominees I can tell you that Brokeback was the clear winner.

This can only mean more drivel to come like the animated New Testiment under the guise of Narnia.

Bitter, you're danmed right I am...

#3 — March 6, 2006 @ 13:00PM — El Bicho [URL]

"The religious right started a campaign to call Hollywood overtly liberal"

If you think that campaign started this year, you obviously don't pay attention politically. Wy wasn't Hollywood scared last year when the religious right called them overtly liberal with the euthanasia film, Million Dollar Baby?

#4 — March 6, 2006 @ 16:59PM — Steve

I must confess, I haven't seen any of the best pic nominees but everyone I know who went to see Brokeback Mountain found it to be quite boring actually. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, I guess.

#5 — March 6, 2006 @ 17:31PM — Diane Marnell

I thought it was absoluely disgraceful that no one stood up when
Lauren Bacall was on stage. She is a legend. This young group of actors today all have the manners of goats!

#6 — March 6, 2006 @ 17:35PM — Aaron, Duke De Mondo [URL]

that Crash won best picture this year, in this company, is just unbelievable. what the hell were those folks thinkin?? and good night and good luck shoulda gotten the award for editing.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/44493)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments