<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on TV Review: <i>House</i> &ndash; "Skin Deep"</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2002-2006 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 02:25:46 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by June on TV Review: &lt;i&gt;House&lt;/i&gt; &amp;ndash; &quot;Skin Deep&quot;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/02/21/080639.php#comment-414583</link>
<description>well to all you people that think the show is that bad then dont watch it and,kent hes a writer it makes it good in episodes like that to make viewers want to know whats next and its different beside haveing adults all the time in serious things like this its just a show it isnt real. 
<![CDATA[
<br /><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2006%2F02%2F21%2F080639.php%23comment-414583&amp;itemDate=2006-07-26+02%3A25%3A46&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+June+on+TV+Review%3A+%3Ci%3EHouse%3C%2Fi%3E+%26ndash%3B+%22Skin+Deep%22"><img border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2006%2F02%2F21%2F080639.php%23comment-414583&amp;itemDate=2006-07-26+02%3A25%3A46&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+June+on+TV+Review%3A+%3Ci%3EHouse%3C%2Fi%3E+%26ndash%3B+%22Skin+Deep%22" /></a>
]]>
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">414583@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 02:25:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by june on TV Review: &lt;i&gt;House&lt;/i&gt; &amp;ndash; &quot;Skin Deep&quot;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/02/21/080639.php#comment-414581</link>
<description>it was a good epsiode shut up
<![CDATA[
<br /><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2006%2F02%2F21%2F080639.php%23comment-414581&amp;itemDate=2006-07-26+02%3A19%3A32&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+june+on+TV+Review%3A+%3Ci%3EHouse%3C%2Fi%3E+%26ndash%3B+%22Skin+Deep%22"><img border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2006%2F02%2F21%2F080639.php%23comment-414581&amp;itemDate=2006-07-26+02%3A19%3A32&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+june+on+TV+Review%3A+%3Ci%3EHouse%3C%2Fi%3E+%26ndash%3B+%22Skin+Deep%22" /></a>
]]>
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">414581@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 02:19:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Kent on TV Review: &lt;i&gt;House&lt;/i&gt; &amp;ndash; &quot;Skin Deep&quot;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/02/21/080639.php#comment-331972</link>
<description>I believe this episode of House went too far.  I am beginning to wonder if the writers have some problems being sexually attracted to children.  This episode along with the episode where a little girl wants to be kissed before she dies and a comment on last weeks show asking the question &quot;teenage sex isn&#039;t interesting?&quot;  Something is wrong here and someone needs to open their eyes.  There is nothing &quot;okay&quot; about making sexual comments to or about an underage child.  What a shame.
<![CDATA[
<br /><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2006%2F02%2F21%2F080639.php%23comment-331972&amp;itemDate=2006-03-09+11%3A25%3A11&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+Kent+on+TV+Review%3A+%3Ci%3EHouse%3C%2Fi%3E+%26ndash%3B+%22Skin+Deep%22"><img border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2006%2F02%2F21%2F080639.php%23comment-331972&amp;itemDate=2006-03-09+11%3A25%3A11&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+Kent+on+TV+Review%3A+%3Ci%3EHouse%3C%2Fi%3E+%26ndash%3B+%22Skin+Deep%22" /></a>
]]>
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">331972@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Mar 2006 11:25:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by jay moore on TV Review: &lt;i&gt;House&lt;/i&gt; &amp;ndash; &quot;Skin Deep&quot;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/02/21/080639.php#comment-324498</link>
<description>Fictional drama is not based on everyday reality but upon exceptional circumstances.  Who wants to watch a TV show with diagnostic physicians diagnosing an acid reflux condition? And, as to whether or not any condition or circumstance has ever existed or occurred in real life must be proven before it can be used to create drama, did Shakespeare have proof that Cleopatra died from a snake&#039;s bite. Was Dr. Watson&#039;s medical information absolutely correct, and is anyone still interested in those things?  Hugh Laurie&#039;s portrayal of House is the best acting on TV, and any script that allows him to exhibit the range of his great talent is quite welcome.    
<![CDATA[
<br /><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2006%2F02%2F21%2F080639.php%23comment-324498&amp;itemDate=2006-02-22+12%3A04%3A22&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+jay+moore+on+TV+Review%3A+%3Ci%3EHouse%3C%2Fi%3E+%26ndash%3B+%22Skin+Deep%22"><img border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2006%2F02%2F21%2F080639.php%23comment-324498&amp;itemDate=2006-02-22+12%3A04%3A22&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+jay+moore+on+TV+Review%3A+%3Ci%3EHouse%3C%2Fi%3E+%26ndash%3B+%22Skin+Deep%22" /></a>
]]>
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">324498@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 12:04:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mary K. Williams on TV Review: &lt;i&gt;House&lt;/i&gt; &amp;ndash; &quot;Skin Deep&quot;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/02/21/080639.php#comment-324342</link>
<description>Awesome write-up Diane. Gawd I love House. I love the show, and the character. He&#039;s such a prick most of the time, but so smart and funny.

Yeah, this show was creepy on several levels. You summed it all up quite well.
<![CDATA[
<br /><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2006%2F02%2F21%2F080639.php%23comment-324342&amp;itemDate=2006-02-21+23%3A55%3A54&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+Mary+K.+Williams+on+TV+Review%3A+%3Ci%3EHouse%3C%2Fi%3E+%26ndash%3B+%22Skin+Deep%22"><img border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2006%2F02%2F21%2F080639.php%23comment-324342&amp;itemDate=2006-02-21+23%3A55%3A54&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+Mary+K.+Williams+on+TV+Review%3A+%3Ci%3EHouse%3C%2Fi%3E+%26ndash%3B+%22Skin+Deep%22" /></a>
]]>
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">324342@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 23:55:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Sister Ray on TV Review: &lt;i&gt;House&lt;/i&gt; &amp;ndash; &quot;Skin Deep&quot;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/02/21/080639.php#comment-324285</link>
<description>As a contrarian, I&#039;d like to one time see a show about a fashion model who&#039;s happy, healthy and drug-free. There must be one somewhere :-&gt;
<![CDATA[
<br /><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2006%2F02%2F21%2F080639.php%23comment-324285&amp;itemDate=2006-02-21+21%3A17%3A54&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+Sister+Ray+on+TV+Review%3A+%3Ci%3EHouse%3C%2Fi%3E+%26ndash%3B+%22Skin+Deep%22"><img border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2006%2F02%2F21%2F080639.php%23comment-324285&amp;itemDate=2006-02-21+21%3A17%3A54&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+Sister+Ray+on+TV+Review%3A+%3Ci%3EHouse%3C%2Fi%3E+%26ndash%3B+%22Skin+Deep%22" /></a>
]]>
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">324285@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 21:17:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Diane Kristine on TV Review: &lt;i&gt;House&lt;/i&gt; &amp;ndash; &quot;Skin Deep&quot;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/02/21/080639.php#comment-324274</link>
<description>I think the biggest problem is people looking to a fictional TV show for medical reality. Not sure if this is the site Carolyn was referring to, but since her link didn&#039;t work: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.angelfire.com/sc/Paraneoplastic/&quot;&gt;International Paraneoplastic Association&lt;/a&gt;

Thanks Jeliel, I definitely don&#039;t need a vacation from House, but my vacation will get in the way of me watching it that week. I probably will eventually do the review anyway, just to avoid the hole in my season reviews!
<![CDATA[
<br /><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2006%2F02%2F21%2F080639.php%23comment-324274&amp;itemDate=2006-02-21+21%3A05%3A38&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+Diane+Kristine+on+TV+Review%3A+%3Ci%3EHouse%3C%2Fi%3E+%26ndash%3B+%22Skin+Deep%22"><img border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2006%2F02%2F21%2F080639.php%23comment-324274&amp;itemDate=2006-02-21+21%3A05%3A38&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+Diane+Kristine+on+TV+Review%3A+%3Ci%3EHouse%3C%2Fi%3E+%26ndash%3B+%22Skin+Deep%22" /></a>
]]>
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">324274@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 21:05:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Carolyn Lawrence on TV Review: &lt;i&gt;House&lt;/i&gt; &amp;ndash; &quot;Skin Deep&quot;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/02/21/080639.php#comment-324234</link>
<description>There&#039;s an even bigger problem with this episode of House. Paraneoplastic syndrome is only VERY rarely associated with testicular cancer (in males or hermaphrodrytes), and it usually does not cause the kind of symptoms that &quot;Alex&quot; is experiencing. Additionally, the type of paraneoplastic syndrome that IS rarely associated with testicular cancer NEVER occurs in teenagers.

The writers really screwed this one up, which is very unfortunate, as paraneoplastic patients and their loved ones deserve better than to be associated with sexual deviancy, hermaphrodism and this terrible show.

Anyone who wishes to learn more about what paraneoplastic is really all about can go to the above website, the International Paraneoplastic Association.
<![CDATA[
<br /><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2006%2F02%2F21%2F080639.php%23comment-324234&amp;itemDate=2006-02-21+20%3A20%3A22&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+Carolyn+Lawrence+on+TV+Review%3A+%3Ci%3EHouse%3C%2Fi%3E+%26ndash%3B+%22Skin+Deep%22"><img border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2006%2F02%2F21%2F080639.php%23comment-324234&amp;itemDate=2006-02-21+20%3A20%3A22&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+Carolyn+Lawrence+on+TV+Review%3A+%3Ci%3EHouse%3C%2Fi%3E+%26ndash%3B+%22Skin+Deep%22" /></a>
]]>
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">324234@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 20:20:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by JELIEL³ on TV Review: &lt;i&gt;House&lt;/i&gt; &amp;ndash; &quot;Skin Deep&quot;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/02/21/080639.php#comment-323892</link>
<description>This episode was so morbidly funny that I was laughing so hard that I missed the follow ups sometimes. 

Great review and article... as usual. Please don&#039;t skip a week. Eventually it&#039;ll go on hiatus....
<![CDATA[
<br /><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2006%2F02%2F21%2F080639.php%23comment-323892&amp;itemDate=2006-02-21+10%3A55%3A34&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+JELIEL%B3+on+TV+Review%3A+%3Ci%3EHouse%3C%2Fi%3E+%26ndash%3B+%22Skin+Deep%22"><img border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2006%2F02%2F21%2F080639.php%23comment-323892&amp;itemDate=2006-02-21+10%3A55%3A34&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+JELIEL%B3+on+TV+Review%3A+%3Ci%3EHouse%3C%2Fi%3E+%26ndash%3B+%22Skin+Deep%22" /></a>
]]>
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">323892@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 10:55:34 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Joanie on TV Review: &lt;i&gt;House&lt;/i&gt; &amp;ndash; &quot;Skin Deep&quot;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/02/21/080639.php#comment-323883</link>
<description>This article has been selected for &lt;a href=&quot;http://cleveland.com/newslogs/tv&quot;&gt;Advance.net&lt;/a&gt;!
<![CDATA[
<br /><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2006%2F02%2F21%2F080639.php%23comment-323883&amp;itemDate=2006-02-21+10%3A42%3A47&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+Joanie+on+TV+Review%3A+%3Ci%3EHouse%3C%2Fi%3E+%26ndash%3B+%22Skin+Deep%22"><img border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2006%2F02%2F21%2F080639.php%23comment-323883&amp;itemDate=2006-02-21+10%3A42%3A47&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+Joanie+on+TV+Review%3A+%3Ci%3EHouse%3C%2Fi%3E+%26ndash%3B+%22Skin+Deep%22" /></a>
]]>
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">323883@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 10:42:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>