<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on <i>Arrested Development</i>: "A very heavy nap"</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 21:19:08 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Joe</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/02/14/134324.php#comment-322988</link>
<description>I love AD and cannot come to grips with the idea that Michael and George Michael in Cabo is the end all be all of AD. I seriously cannot afford Showtime, even though I expect the price to go down if they get AD. I am crossing my fingers that ABC will get it, because they have too many bad shows. According to Jim is one, except that Jim utters a few good lines once in a while and keeps you watching, and Kimberly Williams is too good looking to not be on network primetime. So everybody, please, keep your finger crossed that ABC will pick it up, and I can watch my favorite show. I really want it to continue so we can see how George Sr. uses his freedom, what he does with Bob Loblaw, Stan Sitwell, and Hello (An-nyong), and if Michael will stop calling Ann Veal egg now that George Michael likes Maeby, who is not his cousin.    </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">322988@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 21:19:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Watcher</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/02/14/134324.php#comment-321732</link>
<description>WTF? I didn&#039;t even know it was on because I&#039;m used to it being shown on Mondays.

If they actually wanted people to watch, then it might help not pull this kind of bait and switch crap on the show&#039;s fans.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">321732@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:22:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by char</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/02/14/134324.php#comment-321723</link>
<description>honestly, the first episode of AD i had seen was the season finale and i loved every second of it.  I went out and bought season one and i finished it in less than a day.  If it doesn&#039;t come back for a season four I may as well kill myself.  It&#039;s just THAT DAMN GOOD!!!!!!!!!!!! </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">321723@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:11:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Scott</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/02/14/134324.php#comment-321163</link>
<description>I think the movie idea was a bit of a red herring, only used to get Arrested Development fans talking that there might be a movie.  But I don&#039;t see a movie happening in this case.

It may have also been a sort-of slap at Fox and their handling of the show &lt;i&gt;Firefly&lt;/i&gt;, which of course spawned the &lt;i&gt;Serenity&lt;/i&gt; movie.

Or maybe it was Ron Howard saying that AD could have been a successful movie but, as we all know, wasn&#039;t an overly successful TV show.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">321163@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:41:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by geddy</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/02/14/134324.php#comment-321154</link>
<description>What is your take on the hint of a movie Tom? </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">321154@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:11:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tom</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/02/14/134324.php#comment-320887</link>
<description>Um, Al . . . &quot;Poe&quot;?  Is this a part of a bigger joke of which I am unaware?  Totally lost here.  Please, a &lt;em&gt;real&lt;/em&gt; clue, Al.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">320887@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:33:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tom</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/02/14/134324.php#comment-320886</link>
<description>Chris: I think I already did crack on them.  I stand by it - it was a joke, afterall.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">320886@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:31:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Chris Beaumont</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/02/14/134324.php#comment-320871</link>
<description>I love AD, I miss AD, hopefully someone will pick it up and it continues on its course. But please do not crack on Olympics opening ceremonies and wrestling fans. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">320871@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:57:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by NOT Al Barger</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/02/14/134324.php#comment-320867</link>
<description>[Entire comment deleted]</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">320867@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:48:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tom</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/02/14/134324.php#comment-320857</link>
<description>Scott: I&#039;m guessing Showtime is VERY aware of how many potential new subscribers are thinking the same thing.  Count me among them!

Al: I&#039;m really not sure what you&#039;re alluding to.  Care to clue me in?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">320857@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:36:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Scott</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/02/14/134324.php#comment-320846</link>
<description>If it&#039;s truly gone for good, I will miss it.  If it&#039;s picked up by Showtime, I&#039;m subscribing to it the next day.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">320846@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:16:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by NOT Al Barger</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/02/14/134324.php#comment-320811</link>
<description>[Entire comment deleted]</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">320811@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:11:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>