NEWS

NFL Picks of a Thoughtful Fool, Super Bowl Edition

Written by David Mazzotta
Published February 02, 2006
page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9

Seattle's passing game is ranked 4th, but Pittsburgh also has a top ten pass defense, one that recently stopped a fellow who spells his name P-E-Y...

I'm going with Pittsburgh to win for three reasons. 1) The only outstanding weakness in either team is the Seahawks pass defense; 2) The Steelers got here by beating the top three seeds in the AFC, by comparison, the Seahawks are the best of the Junior Varsity; 3) Bill Cowher's jaw could beat the hell out of Mike Holmgren's chins, even though it would be something like three on one.

So my official pick for the Super Bowl is Pittsburgh -4.

With only a single game left, the borderline degenerate gambler in me starts casting about for other opportunities. For example the over/under is currently 47.5 points. That's actually a fairly high scoring game. Pittsburgh scored an average of 24.5 points and Seattle scored an average of 27.8 points. So if each team scores as much as they did against the average defense they faced over the course of the season, there would be about 52 points.

On the other hand, Pittsburgh allowed an average of 16.3 and the Seahawks allowed an average of 16.5, so call it an average of 33 points total allowed. Split the difference between scored and allowed and you get about 42.5 points, which suggests the under might be a good bet.

But I wouldn't take it. The Super Bowl is so full of weirdness and uncertainty, and then there's the history of blowouts ... no sir, I don't like it. Not at even money, anyway.

Still, there are some proposition bets that look tempting (courtesy of Pinnacle Sports):

First Quarter/First Half results: A $100 bet on the Steelers to be ahead at the end of the first quarter and the end of the first half would yield $150. A similar bet on the Seahawks would return $360. But things get interesting for other combinations, even though they are entirely plausible. Seahawks leading after the first quarter but the Steelers leading at the half would return $850 — very tempting. Tell me that the Seahawks jumping out to an early lead and then running afoul of the Pittsburgh defense before half time is not as likely as a the Steelers leading both the 1st Q and the half. And if Seattle were to jump out to a 1st Q lead but the Steelers just came back to tie by half time, you could actually get $2500 for your $100 wager.

Another potential way to play the notion that the Seahawks might take the first quarter is by laying $100 on all three scenarios that start that way. For what would then be a $300 layout you would win anywhere from $360 to $2500 (returned $460 to $2600 when you include the return of the winning wager) depending on the outcome at half-time. Worth the risk, I think.

page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9
David Mazzotta is author of the comic novels Apple Pie and Business as Usual.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
NFL Picks of a Thoughtful Fool, Super Bowl Edition
Published: February 02, 2006
Type: News
Section: Sports
Filed Under: Sports: Football (American)
Part of a feature: NFL Picks of a Thoughtful Fool
Writer: David Mazzotta
David Mazzotta's BC Writer page
David Mazzotta's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
Articles in this series
BC articles by David Mazzotta
Sports: Football (American)
All Sports Articles
All News articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — February 2, 2006 @ 22:48PM — Matthew T. Sussman [URL]

You had me at "scrunchy-face."

#2 — February 2, 2006 @ 22:48PM — David Mazzotta

And no sooner do I submit this than the Mike Martz deal goes sour. Good ole dependable Lions; they always find a way to stick it to me.

#3 — February 2, 2006 @ 23:19PM — Matthew T. Sussman [URL]

Perhaps they could make an 11th hour deal with Moses Moreno?

#4 — February 2, 2006 @ 23:38PM — Bennett

Great. Thanks.

#5 — February 3, 2006 @ 09:46AM — John Owen [URL]

Dave, great run-down.

I'm actually anticipating one hell of a game, but that's mainly because my wife is from Pittsburgh and I dearly want to see her boys win "One For The Thumb." When you care, really care, about the outcome of a game, not until the score gets to 42-3 do you start to unclench. That's the way it works for me at least. My doctor prescribed 148 ounces of 4.5% ethyl alcohol in a malt suspension for this malady.

Anybody want to start a line on how long it takes from kickoff for the cameras to catch Bill Cowher mouthing the word "m***er f***er"?

#6 — February 3, 2006 @ 10:28AM — Tinkerbell

Do not let me fly to Denver! I repeat: Do not let me fly to Denver! OMG, could it BE any worse???

And I happen to like Dancing With The Stars, except Jerry Rice's quick-step left much to be desired.

#7 — February 3, 2006 @ 10:32AM — Matthew T. Sussman [URL]

Perhaps in two years they could draft Michigan wideout Mario Manningham?

#8 — February 3, 2006 @ 15:07PM — Coasty1977

Thank-you for your positive remarks and insights on the city of detroit. Please dont bless us with your presence

#9 — February 4, 2006 @ 09:12AM — Perry S. Wyatt Jr.

GFY......................Perry S. Wyatt Jr.

#10 — February 5, 2006 @ 09:24AM — Shark

Great stuff, David. You're one of the better writers on BC.


Oh. Almost forgot:

SHARK'S PICK:

Fat guys on steroids by 13.

~Bet on it!

#11 — February 5, 2006 @ 22:57PM — David Mazzotta

So the Steelers take it despite a substandard game from their defense.

The Seahawks played splendidly but pissed away all their scoring chances, confirming what many of us have suspected all year: they are lacking in toughness -- mental toughness in this case. And I'm afraid it starts with the head coach who called some unbelievably nonsensical plays.

So I end the season right about the game, right about the first quarter winner, and technically right about the over/under although my bet went bad because I felt the need to get cute about it. (Let's leave the Knicks out of it, shall we?)

One more question. GFY stands for Good For You, doesn't it?

#12 — February 5, 2006 @ 22:59PM — Temple Stark [URL]

Go with that David :-)

#13 — February 5, 2006 @ 23:22PM — RogerMDillon

Correction: So the Steelers are given it by the referees despite a substandard game from their defense.

#14 — February 6, 2006 @ 07:01AM — Shark

If anyone doubts Shark's Grand Unified Theory that all professional sports are FIXED, I present Superbowl ex-el as prime evidence.

...Oh... and the Fat Guys On Steroids won by 11.

I missed by 2 points.

=====

Bonus stock tip o' the day:

Budweiser:










SELL














quick.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/43098)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments