<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on TV Review: <i>Lost</i>, Episode #34, "The 23rd Psalm"</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2006 01:09:16 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by randy</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/01/12/114509.php#comment-304969</link>
<description>Overall, I like the show, despite my review.  I accept that suspension of disbelief (SoD) is required to accept the premise of the show, the unexplained phenomena and unfolding events, and the different story threads.  What bothers me is that the very obvious, the stuff that doesn&#039;t require an SoD is seemingly being ignored.  The most glaring example is the list of names that Ana Lucia found on the other side of the island.  Since her group, the Tailies, has reunited with Jack and Kate and the originals, there is no indication that she has shared the list with them.    This list has the names of the passengers - how did someone on the island have this list already?

Yes, Ana Lucia killed Shannon, and that was what her entrance was, so to speak, to the other group.  But it&#039;s been a few episodes since then, and we did see her and Jack sharing quiet time on the beach.

Wouldn&#039;t it be logical for her to say, &quot;Oh, and by the way, I found this list of our names, which was in the possession of one of &quot;the others&quot;; do you think we should be concerned?&quot;  If anything, it gives credibility to Locke&#039;s belief that the passengers ended up on the island for a reason.

And yet, no mention has been made.  SoD, sure, ok, I&#039;ll do it, but it is not logical for Ana Lucia NOT to mention the existence of the list when she appears to the rest of the survivors.

It&#039;s stuff like this that drives me nuts about Lost.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">304969@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2006 01:09:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Nik</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/01/12/114509.php#comment-304167</link>
<description>I think that coincidence is one of the biggest themes of the show, and we&#039;re seeing it a lot throughout all the stories. I&#039;m not bothered by it so much. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">304167@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:53:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Catana</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/01/12/114509.php#comment-304128</link>
<description>There was the suggestion, on a discussion board I frequent, that the black cloud is nanobots. Whatever it turns out to be, it was cheesy fx. I was betting on all things mysterious eventually having rational explanations. Now I&#039;m beginning to wonder. The introduction of yet one more &quot;man of faith&quot; is making my stomach kind of queezy. Wish they&#039;d make up their mind whether this program is going to be fish or fowl. It&#039;s one of the very few that I bother to watch, but it&#039;s beginning to slip from my &quot;must see&quot; list to &quot;let&#039;s see if anything more interesting is on tonight.&quot;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">304128@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:44:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Victor Lana</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/01/12/114509.php#comment-304096</link>
<description>I gave up on &lt;i&gt; Lost &lt;/i&gt; because I just don&#039;t like the manipulation of the story. I&#039;m just happy I&#039;ve got &lt;i&gt; 24 &lt;/i&gt; coming back and &lt;i&gt; The Shield &lt;/i&gt;. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">304096@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:03:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Trish</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/01/12/114509.php#comment-304071</link>
<description>Yes, the black smoke effect?  Lame.  Seriously, that&#039;s the best they could come up with?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">304071@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:33:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>