TV Review: Lost, Episode #34, "The 23rd Psalm"
Published January 12, 2006
Did you watch Lost last night, Episode #34, The 23rd Psalm? The element of science fiction was introduced - the "monster", never seen but in the background in a number of episodes, appears to Eko and the HobbitCharlie in the jungle.
While Charlie sits in a tree, swirling black smoke, seemingly sentient and emitting a deep curdling techno-noise, emerges from the distant trees following two explosions, moving very fast and strong enough to destroy a tree in front of it as it speeds to within inches of Eko, then stopping on a virtual, airborne dime, hovering in front of him. The camera glides through the smoke as split-second images from Eko's past appear from within the black cloud - is the smart smoke reading Eko's mind, and sending the images back to the mother ship? After a few more seconds, it retreats at high speed and disappears back into the forest.
So this is what snatched the pilot from the cockpit and killed him, rustled the trees in the first episode, and tried to grab Locke and drag him away in another episode? I waited six weeks to see the big scary monster revealed to be black smoke? Might we see the monolith from 2001 in an upcoming episode as well? The creators of the show have (apparently) stated that the story would not have a SF angle as it unfolds. Well, unless there is a brilliant scientist, inventor, or engineer hiding on the island in an undisclosed location, or the black smoke is related to the Dharma Initiative (I know, it probably is), start the Hugo nomination voting now.
Suspend thy disbelief, my friends, the show can only get weirder and less believable (even with the required suspension of disbelief in the first place.) At the opening of the preceding (recap) episode tonight, the tail of the plane was shown slamming, and I mean SLAMMING into the ocean water at a speed that would have killed most if not everyone on board (assuming anyone could have survived the plane splitting apart in the air in the first place, and the subsequent descent of its parts into the ocean.) Instead, we accept that most survived without a scratch. (Remember the hijacked 767 that was forced to land on the ocean surface near the Comoros Islands in 1996? Six of the twelve crew members and 119 of the 163 passengers died. The crash was caught on video - watch it, and it becomes very difficult to accept the premise of Lost.)
What's happened to Danielle, the nutbag French woman? How is Desmond doing since he split the underground bunker to go hiking? Did a polar bear eat him? How are the sharks with the Dharma logo doing these days, and what happened to the Deliverance extras who kidnapped Walt at the end of Season One?
Part of me wants to think this is brilliant writing and a great story, but another part of me wants to slap the writers silly for adding so much improbability to the many threads in the show, which is becoming one multi-year cocktease. And yes, dammit, I will keep watching Lost.
- TV Review: Lost, Episode #34, "The 23rd Psalm"
- Published: January 12, 2006
- Type: Review
- Section: Video
- Filed Under: Video: Drama, Video: SF
- Writer: Randy Reichardt
- Randy Reichardt's BC Writer page
- Randy Reichardt's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
I gave up on Lost because I just don't like the manipulation of the story. I'm just happy I've got 24 coming back and The Shield .
There was the suggestion, on a discussion board I frequent, that the black cloud is nanobots. Whatever it turns out to be, it was cheesy fx. I was betting on all things mysterious eventually having rational explanations. Now I'm beginning to wonder. The introduction of yet one more "man of faith" is making my stomach kind of queezy. Wish they'd make up their mind whether this program is going to be fish or fowl. It's one of the very few that I bother to watch, but it's beginning to slip from my "must see" list to "let's see if anything more interesting is on tonight."
I think that coincidence is one of the biggest themes of the show, and we're seeing it a lot throughout all the stories. I'm not bothered by it so much.
Overall, I like the show, despite my review. I accept that suspension of disbelief (SoD) is required to accept the premise of the show, the unexplained phenomena and unfolding events, and the different story threads. What bothers me is that the very obvious, the stuff that doesn't require an SoD is seemingly being ignored. The most glaring example is the list of names that Ana Lucia found on the other side of the island. Since her group, the Tailies, has reunited with Jack and Kate and the originals, there is no indication that she has shared the list with them. This list has the names of the passengers - how did someone on the island have this list already?
Yes, Ana Lucia killed Shannon, and that was what her entrance was, so to speak, to the other group. But it's been a few episodes since then, and we did see her and Jack sharing quiet time on the beach.
Wouldn't it be logical for her to say, "Oh, and by the way, I found this list of our names, which was in the possession of one of "the others"; do you think we should be concerned?" If anything, it gives credibility to Locke's belief that the passengers ended up on the island for a reason.
And yet, no mention has been made. SoD, sure, ok, I'll do it, but it is not logical for Ana Lucia NOT to mention the existence of the list when she appears to the rest of the survivors.
It's stuff like this that drives me nuts about Lost.




Yes, the black smoke effect? Lame. Seriously, that's the best they could come up with?