<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on What If Terrorists Attacked The US Again?</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2007 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 8 Jul 2008 03:51:56 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Dave Nalle on What If Terrorists Attacked The US Again?</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/01/02/184547.php#comment-731466</link>
<description>TS, as far as I can tell from the tracking system that 2008 was in the title from the time it was published 2 years ago.  The thread was brought back by the recent comments, not the date in the title.  I&#039;ve removed it so you can rest easy.

Dave</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">731466@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 8 Jul 2008 03:51:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by TS on What If Terrorists Attacked The US Again?</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/01/02/184547.php#comment-731457</link>
<description>Can we NOT give this &lt;b&gt;2006&lt;/b&gt; piece a &lt;b&gt;2008&lt;/B&gt; date? I&#039;d rather not have my piece misrepresented so egregiously. What happened? Is there a reasonable explanation?

AGAIN, this piece was written in 2006 but was given a 2008 date.
AGAIN, this piece was written in 2006 but was given a 2008 date.
AGAIN, this piece was written in 2006 but was given a 2008 date.
AGAIN, this piece was written in 2006 but was given a 2008 date.
AGAIN, this piece was written in 2006 but was given a 2008 date.
AGAIN, this piece was written in 2006 but was given a 2008 date.
AGAIN, this piece was written in 2006 but was given a 2008 date.
AGAIN, this piece was written in 2006 but was given a 2008 date.
AGAIN, this piece was written in 2006 but was given a 2008 date.



</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">731457@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 8 Jul 2008 02:11:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by bliffle on What If Terrorists Attacked The US Again?</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/01/02/184547.php#comment-731442</link>
<description>Only if the president actually reads the intel memo a month beforehand.

Only if the National Security Advisor sees fit to bring the warning to his attention.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">731442@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 8 Jul 2008 00:20:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by James on What If Terrorists Attacked The US Again?</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/01/02/184547.php#comment-731415</link>
<description>It can happen any time any where America always has to be ready because i wouldnt be surprised if it happened again but in future at least we will be more aware</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">731415@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Jul 2008 22:14:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>