REVIEW

Movie Review: Pride & Prejudice and Oliver Twist: Real/Ideal

Written by Alan Dale
Published December 26, 2005
page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8

A few minor objections: in the early scenes Kitty and Lydia are so antically in character I was wishing for a giant flyswatter. Knightley also has a tendency to lift her upper lip and wrinkle her nose in a way that is just too cute. She overcomes this bad habit, whereas Donald Sutherland as Mr. Bennett seems to have nothing left as an actor but the habit itself. He's not a joke (as he was when "choking back tears" in a BBC interview, in which he compared NBC's editing of Kanye West's comment about President Bush during a Hurricane Katrina relief telethon to book-burning in Nazi Germany), but he is unpardonably boring. Judi Dench as Lady Catherine makes that great comic Gorgon steely and flat without making her funny. I had no idea what kind of high drama Dench thought she was reaching for. And Wright goes in for a few "arty" touches that he doesn't have the moviemaking flair for--when, for instance, the other dancers in a ballroom disappear leaving an angry Elizabeth and a bewildered Darcy dancing alone.

More significantly, the movie almost helplessly emphasizes personality over Austen's more encompassing vision of the harmonic utility of the social arrangements she depicts. She's not a snob but she believes that a hierarchical, landed society provides the most, and deepest, contentment for the most people. If a movie doesn't get this out of Austen then it's cruising below the highest attainable altitude. It was this aspect of Emma that walloped me in Ralph Rader's 18th-century novel class at UC Berkeley; after his last lecture I had to run to a phone and tell somebody about it. (My most concerted attempt to live up to Rader's teaching can be found toward the end of my chapter about Clueless (1995), Amy Heckerling's spectacularly pleasurable modernization of Emma, in my new book.) I don't think Wright's Pride & Prejudice can widen your opinion of Austen, as Rader's lectures did mine. The worst I can say on this basis, however, is merely that the movie isn't everything it possibly could have been, given its source. All the same, this Pride & Prejudice has an enormously satisfying emotional payoff on the personal level, which is almost beyond hoping for at the movies.

This 31 July 2005 Times Online article includes interesting information about what Wright and Moggach felt they were doing with the movie. Wright, for example, says he was stunned to discover that Austen was "one of the first British realists," and keyed the movie to this "discovery." When I repeated this to Maria DiBattista, my thesis advisor, she looked at me blankly and said, "What other possibility is there?" Wright's self-confessed ignorance of literary history is thus doubly shocking, considering how insightfully he has brought Austen to the screen.

page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8
Alan Dale earned a Ph.D. in Comparative Literature from Princeton University and a J.D. from Yale Law School. He currently works as a corporate tax attorney in Portland, Oregon. He is the author of What We Do Best: American Movie Comedies of the 1990s and Comedy Is a Man in Trouble: Slapstick in American Movies.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Movie Review: Pride & Prejudice and Oliver Twist: Real/Ideal
Published: December 26, 2005
Type: Review
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Romantic Comedies, Video: Drama, Video: Art House
Writer: Alan Dale
Alan Dale's BC Writer page
Alan Dale's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Alan Dale
Video: Romantic Comedies
Video: Drama
Video: Art House
All Video Articles
Alan Dale's personal weblog
All Review articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — December 26, 2005 @ 17:34PM — Aaman [URL]

Great post, Alan - social climbers and hardscrabble minimum wage young'uns never go out of fashion, or demand

#2 — December 27, 2005 @ 18:02PM — Alan Dale [URL]

Thanks, Aaman. Yeah, the stories are both "perennials." It's weird how Dickens is still a well-known figure in the popular imagination but based on a very narrow selection of his books. People should branch out--there's a lot better stuff on his shelf than Oliver Twist and A Christmas Carol.

#3 — December 27, 2005 @ 20:18PM — The Theory

good article.

I just finished reading Pride and Prejudice and very much loved it. I've heard nothing but good things about the movie and hope to see that soon.

I realize you don't really care about any of that, but I'm still sad that the book is over. It's one of those where I wish there was a whole series I could read.

#4 — December 27, 2005 @ 22:38PM — Alan Dale [URL]

Thanks for writing. Actually I do care that people read and enjoy books like Pride and Prejudice. I'm sad there are only six Austen books to read.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/41481)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments