OPINION

Why Ray Charles Matters

Written by Robert Lashley
Published December 17, 2005
page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

What so many people don't understand is that before Charles, a great deal of this music wasn't known to the world, and denied to millions of Americans via the destructive nature of racial prejudice. The Reverend Thomas Dorsey, an old bluesman who was doing R. Kelly when R. Kelly was a twinkle in his grandaddy's eye( his single " It's tight like that" sold 7 million copies), founded modern gospel in the early 30's by fusing the spirituals and work songs with Blues and jazz musical structures. Mahalia Jackson, Sister Rosetta Tharpe and the Clara Ward singers earned iconic status with each of their million selling 45's. But it was Charles, a walking musical encyclopedia built on the rudiments of gospels fundamentals, who brought it to a world by fusing it with secular themes. When you look at Ray's art, you have to start with his voice, that unmistakably original acid on velvet mid range growl which could rise to a joyously shrieking falsetto that sounded like the living embodiment of a lust for life, then sink to a hoarse baritone that sounded straight out of the exact place between purgatory and hell. That voice was part preacher, part field hollerer, part love man, part con man, part blues man, part dead man, whose vocal leaps were, to paraphrase Ellison's description of Jackson,

" An art which depends on the employment of the full expressive resources of the human voice-from the rough growl employed by blues singers, the intermediate sounds, half cry, half recitative, which are common to eastern music; the rough edged tones and broad vibratos, the high shrill and grating tones which rasp ones ears like the agonized flourishes of flamenco, to the gut tones, which remind us of where the jazz trombone found his human source"

But it was the staggering, nearly byzantine ambition that encompassed Charles' musical mind which is the foundation for his art. You can hear it in his first imprint on the pop music world, 1955's I Got A Woman. The shuffling big beat borrows from Louis Jordan's big band fusion, the backbeat is 2/4 gospel. The arrangement is lucid, not quite jazz, not quite blues, definitely not rock and roll but something sophisticated altogether. The emotions are feral, but not quite the primitiveness of rock and roll. It is the sound of life, a place where there is an ever flowing river of cool. It, you might ask? Rhythm and Blues, Ray Charles' invention.

A volcano bubbling under the surface, Ray spent the mid 50's crafting timeless songs as if there were cars on an assembly Start with the blasphemous fusion of Hallelujah I love Her So and This Little Girl of Mine, where Ray changes the words from loving god to loving a woman, yet, in the intensity of his performance, raises the question if he's still loving the same thing. Then go to the power of Drown In My Own Tears, ray sanctified sermon on romantic heartbreak. If you want more, try the gospel and rockabilly fusion of Leave My Woman Alone, the first inkling of Charles' master plan to single handedly conquer roots music. Other examples include Lonely Avenue's' backbeat on loan from god, the dizzying rhythm patterns and chord progressions of Aint that Love and Swannee River Rock and the indie spirit and jazz fusion of any of his songs with Milt Jackson .

page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Why Ray Charles Matters
Published: December 17, 2005
Type: Opinion
Section: Music
Filed Under: Music: R&B, Culture: Arts
Writer: Robert Lashley
Robert Lashley's BC Writer page
Robert Lashley's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Robert Lashley
Music: R&B
Culture: Arts
All Music Articles
All Opinion articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — December 17, 2005 @ 07:54AM — Sean [URL]

Excellent commentary. Too many people I have talked to think that Ray's genius overcame his country material. I have always thought it was the perfect marriage: great songs interpreted by a master of music.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/41112)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments