REVIEW

CD Review: Slipknot - 9.0: Live

Written by Jonathan Deamer
Published December 16, 2005

For the first time in the ten years they've been together, and just in time for Christmas, Slipknot have decided to put their infamous live show onto cold, hard plastic. Last year's Subliminal Verses tour won them the Metal Hammer award for Best Live Act, so here they've tried to faithfully recapture the experience for their loyal army of what they like to call 'maggots' - that's fans to you and me.

The problem with reproducing a Slipknot gig on CD though is that it's like building the Taj Mahal out of Lego. Sure, it's the same basic idea, but it's not quite as breathtaking, not quite as enormous, and nowhere near as good. It's difficult to argue that going to see nine men in masks, famed for copious use of the word 'motherfucker' and carrying out vital bodily functions onstage is going to be all about the music, maaan. With Slipknot, the spectacle's equally important, and this album just doesn't allow you to feel the full force of their stadium theatrics.

Whereas 2002's Disasterpieces DVD showed drummer Joey Jordison's solo on a kit that rose in the air and spun upside down like a percussion rollercoaster, all you get here is the sound of lightning fast fills on a snare that sounds like a giant ping-pong ball. Even the band's interaction with the audience is redundant - without the visuals it's just some bloke repeatedly shouting "Jump the fuck up!"

9.0:Live isn't redeemed by the music itself either. Onstage antics aside, Slipknot have shown themselves to be a genuinely innovative band, moving metal beyond braindead chugga-chugga riffage. On this recording however, all notion of subtlety is lost: without Ross Robinson at the helm, intricate samples and scratches are replaced by a sludgy guitar that seems to be mangled with a fist more than played.

It's that old cliché with retrospective collections: great as a curio for completist fans, but purely as a listening experience, the less said the better. Come 25th December, a lot of black-clad teenagers are going to wish they'd been given socks instead.

More reviews and articles like this on my music blog Bloody Awful Poetry

Jonathan Deamer writes music reviews and articles like this on his blog, along with all sorts of other interesting bits and pieces on his tumblelog.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Buy from Amazon.com
9.0: Live 9.0: Live
Slipknot
Music,

CD Review: Slipknot - 9.0: Live
Published: December 16, 2005
Type: Review
Section: Music
Filed Under: Music: Alternative Rock, Music: Hard Rock, Music: Metal
Writer: Jonathan Deamer
Jonathan Deamer's BC Writer page
Jonathan Deamer's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Jonathan Deamer
Music: Alternative Rock
Music: Hard Rock
Music: Metal
All Music Articles
Jonathan Deamer's personal weblog
All Review articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — December 16, 2005 @ 17:39PM — Aaron Fleming [URL]

I haven't heard this but I totally agree with the lack that an audio-only experience has when it comes to Slipknot live.

I could take or leave their music but I did see them live (supporting the main reason for my presence, Metallica), and they were great. It's not just the visual aspect that is lost on CD format, but it's the energy and adreneline contained within the shows that it's not able to capture.

But that's just the way it is, and suppose the same could be said of other live albums (although some undoubtedly vary in experience duplication).

Good review.

#2 — December 16, 2005 @ 18:02PM — Jonathan [URL]

Cheers for your commments Aaron. I agree - it's a problem many live albums suffer from. However, some are worthwhile for their musical value alone (extended jams from prog bands etc are a notable example of this), despite the lack of spectacle. Needless to say, Slipknot aren't one of these!

#3 — December 17, 2005 @ 13:31PM — Guppusmaximus

I'm sorry, I guess I will have to be the bad guy here...
I disagree that Slipknot pioneered anything about metal other than being the first band to hire 9 people and still sound like a 4 piece...

They basically jumped on the lack of talent Down-tuning bandwagon that includes Korn and Limp Bizkit. To me it's amazing that they still have an open channel to distribute this garbage and that people still buy it... No offense personally, I just can't stand this style of crap that gets labeled as Metal.

#4 — December 17, 2005 @ 15:39PM — Jonathan [URL]

I'm by no means a fan of Slipknot, but I've always thought they were much more interesting than Limp Bizkit's brand of bad rapping with poor lyrics and ham-fisted guitar playing. They just seem to sound a bit more "current" than metal groups like Slayer, Metallica etc. (Hope I don't get all the metal purists up in arms by lumping those two together, but you know what I mean!)

#5 — April 25, 2007 @ 10:37AM — zach

cmon are u guys serious slipknot is the greatest metal band of our time!!!...they paved the way for static X and others cmon now learn to listen maggots!!!

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/41094)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments