<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on I Am Not Superstitious - Knock On Wood</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2006 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 4 Nov 2006 22:34:51 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by may on I Am Not Superstitious - Knock On Wood</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/11/11/023806.php#comment-473597</link>
<description>I actually completely agree.  At least for me, it is a defense mechanism against whatever disappointment that may happens. Since I&#039;ve already anticipated the worst scenerio, and think I can I still handle that come what may, whatever really happens will be ok.
That&#039;s my logic.

BTW, congruatulations Diane, as the Blogcritic of the month, way to go!  You are the first House blog that I read that I really liked and always found some interesting insights about. Still need to go thru other books/tvs/films reviews that you did.  Loved the Lawrence Kaplow interview.

Keep it up. ;-)
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">473597@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 4 Nov 2006 22:34:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Temple Stark on I Am Not Superstitious - Knock On Wood</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/11/11/023806.php#comment-274211</link>
<description>This is an Blogcritics editors&#039; pick of the week. Click &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/11/17/050436.php&quot;&gt;HERE &lt;/A&gt;to find out why.

Also, NEW this week, we are requesting the honor of your very own &quot;best of the week that was&quot; pick for showing an interest and a dedication in your own writing, and as a second thank you for writing well. I will be e-mailing you separately on this as well, but for a little more info read the top of the link above.


Cheers. - Temple, BC editor / Special Projects Director</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">274211@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 07:43:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by deekay on I Am Not Superstitious - Knock On Wood</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/11/11/023806.php#comment-270863</link>
<description>Shhh! There is nothing out there to thwart us! Don&#039;t even think that! 

Seriously, I don&#039;t &lt;i&gt;actually&lt;/i&gt; believe my thoughts influence anything. It&#039;s sort of a self-defence mechanism against disappointment. But I don&#039;t look at the world through that weirdly negative lens all the time - I&#039;m usually a pretty positive person - it&#039;s just these little things that are within my grasp but haven&#039;t happened yet that I force myself not to expect. I&#039;m not sure you can look at this weird little habit logically, much as I protest that it is completely rational, except that it&#039;s my way of controlling disappointments where I can.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">270863@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2005 14:45:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen on I Am Not Superstitious - Knock On Wood</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/11/11/023806.php#comment-270668</link>
<description>more nice writing deekay, thanks! And most of us know the pleasnat tingle of things turnig out better than we expected. But from a purely mechanistic standpoint, wouldn&#039;t thinking positive thoughts influence reality for the better? Under your scenario there would have to be something in the universe out to thwart us.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">270668@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2005 11:18:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>