Miller Finally Leaves NY Times
Published November 09, 2005
To: Judith Miller c/o The New York Times
From: A Former Reporter/Current News Junkie
Re: Retirement Party at Libby's House - Bring your notes for a planned bonfire
Judy, Judy, Judy.
Thanks to the great media Web site Poynter.org I came to read in the New York Times that the newspaper and you have reached an agreement in which you are leaving the newspaper. And already, the New York Observer has reported that your colleagues - oh, I mean your former colleagues - are happy you are leaving.
Hey, I read it in the newspaper - so it must be true, right? I mean, it's not like anyone would lie about something in the paper, not about something important like whether your departure will help newsroom morale or if, say, Iraq has weapons of mass destruction.
So you have retired?
I'm hoping this means truly retired, as in leaving the profession with no plans to do this type of work for any other new organizations.
In other words, I'm hoping this is Tonya Harding post-Nancy Kerrigan attack-retired, where you're shamed into working outside your profession. As opposed to most news personalities who "retire" from one news organization only to then join another.
Perhaps you can go do now what you do best - help Republicans with public-relations campaigns. You retired a few days late for what would have been the perfect job in my eyes - You could have taken the place of I. Libby Lewis Jr, your source and the former chief of staff for Vice President Dick Cheney. Wouldn't that have been true poetic justice? But while that job has been filled I'm sure there are other administration jobs that Cheney or Rove would give you in a heartbeart.
Or maybe you can be an assistant for Robert Novak?
I want to congratulate you. You managed to bring closure - at the same time - to two issues I've been writing about.
First, I've been giving a hard time to the New York Times for its bad professional habit of getting scooped - not just on any big news, but scooped on a regular basis on all stories relating to you, Judy. So what do you do when the news starts to break about your retirement? You post your letter announcing your retirement on your own Web site, thus scooping the Times, sort of, on its news about you one more time.
Second, I've been writing for sometime that the Times needed to fire your sorry butt since you are a disgrace to this industry who makes Jayson Blair look good in comparison. As Jenny D rightly points out at PressThink, there is no good reason why the Society for Professional Journalists or other groups should be fooled by your attempts to act like a journalism martyr, let alone give you awards and recognition. For the truth is that when push came to shove and life in jail became difficult for you, you accepted the waiver - which had already been offered - and sang like a canary.
- Miller Finally Leaves NY Times
- Published: November 09, 2005
- Type: Opinion
- Section: Politics
- Filed Under: Books: News, Video: News
- Part of a feature: Media Reality Check
- Writer: Scott Butki
- Scott Butki's BC Writer page
- Scott Butki's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
If any group of people recently have given journalism a bad name, surely Judith Miller is among them, along with Robert Novak, the guy who was shilling for Bush about the "no child left behind" act, & that guy who was illicitly at (& working for) the white house. I'm glad she's going; frankly she should have been gone long ago - but THAT was the 'Times' fault. They should have been exercising at least some degree of oversight, & they wimped out & failed to do so.
If Novak had any decency, he'd also leave; he certainly doesn't seem to have much credibility or honor left among his collegues or anyone else.
It's boggled me how quick everyone was to turn on Miller.
I was never for Miller, Matthew.
I agree, Nancy.
I'm watching Charlie Rose' interview of Sulzburger right now, and it's pathetic. He simply will not address the issue that Miller was manipulated by Libby and lied. That she did not check her sources against independent sources. The entire legitimization for Iraq invasion was based on Millers inept and incompetent reporting. She should be drummed out of the reporting business for her lack of attention and thoroughness. Her excuse "when your sources are wrong, you're wrong" simply does not hold up for an investigative reporter. No, Miller drank the kool-aid in order to get the scoop. Period. Venality. Hunger and greed.
Great post. I agree.
Here's a
Miller update. Are her 15 minutes up yet?




Since I posted my column, Miller has appeared at a panel discussion about the media, been interviewed by the Washington Post and said she is getting job offers but won't disclose details.
--------------------------------