OPINION

Lists: It's Not Who You Are, But Where You Are

Written by Richard Marcus
Published October 25, 2005

This past year has seen the proliferation of the insidious Top (insert subject and number here) List. Top ten this, top twenty-five that, top fifty, top one hundred, hell there might even be a top one thousand something or other out there for all I know. On its own "Time Magazine" has put out at least four: Top 100 English language books, Top 100 movies, Top 50 Blogs, and Top 10 Graphic Novels.

Over the past few months I've seen lists ranging from "Rolling Stone's" Top 100 Guitarists, Top Ten worst band names, worst song titles, best all time actors (both male and female). Hell I was guilty of contributing to the mess myself by compiling a list of my twenty favourite women actors.

I have yet to see any point to these things. The argument could be made that they are a means of formulating discussion on topics, but have you seen any of the comments left in any of the threads where these lists are discussed? The majority of it descends into slanging matches and insults. In a world where very few people understand that someone can hold a different opinion without being a congenital idiot, reasonable discourse has gone the way of the horse and buggy.

The question in my head, one of many about the peculiarities of modern life, is what impulse drives these list makers? Do the publications make them simply to attract attention to them selves or do they honestly believe they are seen as arbitrators of taste and style to the extent that their opinions are of significant consequence?

Of course by far the worst offender in that game is our friend Oprah. Not content with clogging the air waves with her hackneyed new age babble speak psychologist friends, celebrity ass licking, and sentimental manipulation, she has set herself up as the seal of approval for novels.

That ubiquities O stares back at you from the covers of books everywhere now. Bookstores have racks devoted to "Oprah's Book Club" choices, and I'm sure publishers are vying for the right to get that blue sticker plunked on the cover of their books. Somehow or other she has gained such influence that the sales figures of any book she selects jumps significantly.

When I think about, and in all honestly I try not to give the world of popular culture too much thought because it tends to make me cranky-hence this article-, I begin to see a correlation between Oprah's book club and The Lists. As she gains more influence on the minds and hearts of the consumer, others have begun to worry that their self-perceived place in the pantheon of mass cultural impact is being eroded.

Establishments like "Time Magazine", who've always had an overblown view of their own importance (Man of The Year), are finally beginning to realize that they are not even close to being the only game in town anymore. As a weekly they've never been able to be as topical as the newspapers, and now with more and more people using the Internet as a source of news, they have become even less relevant. They and the other print media are desperate to find the means to regain their positions as the voice of authority.

page 1 | 2
Copy02-11-Richard portrait-72-4x4.jpgRichard Marcus is a long-haired Canadian iconoclast who writes reviews and opines on the world as he sees it at Leap In The Dark and Epic India Magazine.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Lists: It's Not Who You Are, But Where You Are
Published: October 25, 2005
Type: Opinion
Section: Culture
Filed Under: Culture: Arts, Culture: Media
Writer: Richard Marcus
Richard Marcus's BC Writer page
Richard Marcus's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Richard Marcus
Culture: Arts
Culture: Media
All Culture Articles
Richard Marcus's personal weblog
All Opinion articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — October 25, 2005 @ 09:23AM — Robert [URL]

List are popular because they are fun.

Period.

People love to discuss and disagree, not to mention just think about what should or should not be on a particular list. A list is nothing more than criticism. Your article itself is critisism, so it comes from the same mold as lists do. In essence, you are using the very method you are arguing against.

So, are you really sure you want to be a blogger? Because lists and blogs go together like Salt & Pepper.

#2 — October 25, 2005 @ 10:14AM — JR

Top Ten People Who Don't Belong On Any List:

...um... uh-oh.

#3 — October 31, 2005 @ 13:27PM — Temple A. Stark [URL]

Gypsyman,

This post was chosen by the section editor as a BC pick of the week. Go HERE (link) to find out why.

And thank you
- Temple

#4 — November 1, 2005 @ 10:07AM — Oran Kelley [URL]



Unfortunately the entry has changed from the "pick of the week" on lists to a tiresome fictional run-through of the water-export scare story so popular here in the midwest.

They're coming for our children next . . .

opk

#5 — November 1, 2005 @ 10:11AM — Oran Kelley [URL]



Seems to be fixed!

opk

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/38471)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments