TV REVIEW: Commander In Chief v. West Wing: For a Start - No Balls
Published October 21, 2005
1.3 Episode aired Oct. 18
Not to speak of the obvious, but Commander in Chief lacks balls. But let's put the blame where it belongs, not with Geena Davis, but with the scriptwriters.
In his effort to discredit President Mackenzie Allen, House Speaker Nathan Templeton successfully got three cabinet members to resign and went after chief of staff Jim Gardner (Harry Lennix), who used to be now-dead Republican President Bridge's chief of staff, as well. In blunt, tactless language he urged Gardner to also resign and for that duty "you can be my vice president." Templeton tells the man - who is black - think of the history - the first black vice president. Don't just think of the office of the president; think of the the history of your people.
Well, being the first woman as president is arguably a greater fictional landmark and why wouldn't Gardner aspire to the presidency himself?
So there's that and the fact that Gardner in Episode 1 already wanted Allen to resign so Templeton could move in as president. But in this episode you can see his disgust at Templeton's massive grab for power.
So, bear with me here a moment.
West Wing at its best was both about the grand gestures and the subtleties; about a president unafraid. One of such stand-out moments was when President Bartlet humiliated a talk radio host, loosely based on Dr. Laura Schlessinger. (and "loose" and "Dr. Laura" have often appeared in the same room together. Except visually.).
In "The Midterms" episode which aired exactly five years ago - Oct. 18, 2000 - from when this third ever episode of CoC aired, Bartlet walks into a room of on-air talk radio "personalities" and sees a few people he really dislikes, including one Dr. Jenna Jacobs, daintily eating crab cakes, who has called homosexuality an "abomination"
"I like your show. I like how you call homosexuality an "abomination!"
"I don't say homosexuality is an abomination, Mr. President. The Bible does."
"Yes, it does. Leviticus!"
Which then causes Bartlet to rip through a few Leviticus and Exodus verses of what the Bible says - freely sell your sons and daughters into slavery, kill those who work on the Sabbath, don't touch pig skin. And Bartlet ends it with ::: "One last thing. While you may be mistaking this for your monthly meeting of the Ignorant Tight-Ass Club, in this building when the president stands, nobody sits."
It's just a glorious smackdown. Even if it was heavily "cribbed". (Leviticus also says eating shellfish - like crab - is perhaps - a greater abomination, though this isn't referenced in the show)
Reel it back in to Commander In Chief, 2005. We're at the state dinner and Templeton's assistant, tells Gardner, "Now's the time."
- TV REVIEW: Commander In Chief v. West Wing: For a Start - No Balls
- Published: October 21, 2005
- Type: Review
- Section: Video
- Writer: Temple Stark
- Temple Stark's BC Writer page
- Temple Stark's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
The West Wing is still better. I'm talking past tense on the episode(s) that are past :-)
On second thoguht and a reread - You're right Michael, it does come across that way.
I keep on missing West Wing because of its new time. I managed to remember it about 20 minutes in last Sunday and I was struck with the comfortable familiarity. It's in its seventh season and I think it's still compelling.
Also, someone somewhere I read thought all the scenes with lame duck Bartlet were old and not worth it compared to the campaign. I think it was the Jeers column in Tv Guide.
As I watched, I thought a combination of the two would be grand. Move some of the best characters and/ or plot lines over from West Wing into this show.
And Mary Louise Parker (Amy on the show, right???) and Matlin I would love to have stay.
Fire female president. First deaf ... Labor Secretary or DefSec (get it?) - or whatever.
You've agreed with what I've been saying for a while. I'll go further and suggest that the best of "Commander in Chief" is still worse than the worst of "The West Wing" and the current season of "The West Wing" is scarcely its worst. Moreover, "The West Wing", now languishing in a death slot, is better than virtually every new drama that NBC debuted this season.
I should have typed "first female president" in my last post, not "fire ..."
On West Wing - people can be swayed by the "it's no longer cool to watch the show" factor and when your network shitcans you to a weird timeslot (which probably isn't that bad, but I'm just not used to it), the anti-momentum builds and then it's "buh bye."
I don't often say, "I told you so," though recent events here bring the phrase to mind.
But, I told you so, this series died. It was just forced and fucked up.





Temple,
The funny thing about this review is that you mention The West Wing in past tense. As if it wasn't still on the air. It is, of course, but I suspect you're really tacitly acknowledging that it's no longer worth watching.
So maybe the question is not so much about how this show measures up to The West Wing at its best, but at its now-unwatchable state. Which of the two is worthier?