<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Maximum Quadrophenia</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2005 09:45:35 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by steve ruehrwein</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/10/21/042213.php#comment-271360</link>
<description>I just picked up the 3 dvd set and have to say the 1996 Quadrophenia set is absolutely stunning. 

Played in it&#039;s entirety, the music and story line ebbs and flows in a way that is only hinted at with the original 1973 release.That LP&#039;s mix suffered, but you knew there was some great stuff buried down there. The &#039;79 soundtrack yielded 3 or 4 more odd tracks from the story, which I suppose lended themselves to flesh out the character complexity.
The remix from 1996 breathes new life, and brings the band more to the front.
Then the dvd &#039;96 concert version appeared. Viewed in it&#039;s entirety as with the others, The Quadrophenia concert, bought out all kinds of emotion. Pure raw emotion.
No one word can accurately describe this.
But wasn&#039;t this the intent of the storyline?
I&#039;m not going to hash over details, as many folks have heard this body of work and it&#039;s side-bars, but I will say that personally, the Quadrophenia show is the best concert I never went to, and the final concert I ever want to see.    </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">271360@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2005 09:45:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Publius</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/10/21/042213.php#comment-270471</link>
<description>I can&#039;t wait to receive my 3 DVD set!!1
I saw them live in 1996 with Quadrophenia...wow...A MUST SEE...now ...A MUST OWN!!!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">270471@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 22:07:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by LegendaryMonkey</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/10/21/042213.php#comment-258970</link>
<description>Excellent review... not at all what I expected when I opened this up. I don&#039;t know enough about The Who&#039;s catalogue, I think. I can recognize them when I hear them, but y&#039;know, they were a little before my time. This sparks my interest... I think I have to take a longer, closer look.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">258970@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 11:01:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Yashin</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/10/21/042213.php#comment-258883</link>
<description>I was a big fan of the who when I was younger. I can remember buying the Tommy double CD when I was about 13 and thinking it was pish. I took it back to the shop and swapped it for Quadraphenia, a move I&#039;m still very happy with.

Where Tommy has a few great songs and a lot of brass-driven nonsense, Quadraphenia is a much more balanced experience driven by good old fashioned guitar tunes.

Plus the film version is infinitely better.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">258883@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 04:53:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>