Bill Bennett - Racist, Ignorant, or Both?
Published October 15, 2005
Is William Bennett a racist? Only William (Bill) Bennett knows. That said; Bill Bennett can only be judged by what he says and how he responds to criticisms of what he says.
On September 28, 2005, the following interaction occurred on Bill Bennett's Morning in America radio show:
CALLER: I noticed the national media, you know, they talk a lot about the loss of revenue, or the inability of the government to fund Social Security, and I was curious, and I've read articles in recent months here, that the abortions that have happened since Roe v. Wade, the lost revenue from the people who have been aborted in the last 30-something years, could fund Social Security as we know it today. And the media just doesn't — never touches this at all.
BENNETT: Assuming they're all productive citizens?
CALLER: Assuming that they are. Even if only a portion of them were, it would be an enormous amount of revenue.
BENNETT: Maybe, maybe, but we don't know what the costs would be, too. I think as — abortion disproportionately occur among single women? No.
CALLER: I don't know the exact statistics, but quite a bit are, yeah.
BENNETT: All right, well, I mean, I just don't know. I would not argue for the pro-life position based on this, because you don't know. I mean, it cuts both — you know, one of the arguments in this book Freakonomics that they make is that the declining crime rate, you know, they deal with this hypothesis, that one of the reasons crime is down is that abortion is up. Well --
CALLER: Well, I don't think that statistic is accurate.
BENNETT: Well, I don't think it is either, I don't think it is either, because first of all, there is just too much that you don't know. But I do know that it's true that if you wanted to reduce crime, you could — if that were your sole purpose, you could abort every black baby in this country, and your crime rate would go down. That would be an impossible, ridiculous, and morally reprehensible thing to do, but your crime rate would go down. So these far-out, these far-reaching, extensive extrapolations are, I think, tricky.
The caller was concerned about abortion in the context of population loss.
- Bill Bennett - Racist, Ignorant, or Both?
- Published: October 15, 2005
- Type: Opinion
- Section: Politics
- Filed Under: Books: Politics and Affairs, Politics: U.S.
- Writer: PoliticalTruths
- PoliticalTruths's BC Writer page
- PoliticalTruths's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments on this articleComments
I'm a negro and Ive read enough stormfront and National Alliance rhetoric to know that, although I've never been arrested, eventually I will be because I was born Black...that sucks, cause I dont want to go to jail. But I have no choice I guess. Toledo is a prime example! Those black rioted because they couldnt help it. Their skin compelled them to! Now where are some white women that I can rape?
Cooooooon,
Your type sarcasm is what divides people. It is important to understand the underlying dynamics of all actions. Only then can one solve the problem.
Many doctors see a patient with high blood pressure and simply subscribe beta blockers. Better physicians do an inexpensive blood workup to determine whether the high blood pressure is a result of some other problem (kidney failure etc). Thorough doctors do the above and further monitor as they know that underlying problems usually require intelligent thought and analysis (high blood pressure can caused kidney damage but also kidney damage's effect can be high blood pressure).
BTW, it is unlikely you are "negro" as your sarcasm borders on self hate.
This comment by Bennett re the aborting of black babies and its positive effect on crime rates, is both offensive and stupid.
You can no longer play the race card when it comes to crime stats. A lot of so-called "black" people in the USA have at least one or more forebears who are white. For example if an African male marries a Swedish woman, the children will be called "black" simply because they skin has some pigmentation.But since their racial mix is exactly 50/50, they could also be legitimately be called white.
Politically also, it is very unhelpful to engage in this kind of rhetoric. I don't know what Bennett was thinking about when he let this fly, but he would do well to pause and inhale next time round.
Crime is generally caused by people with economic problems. We have a society that needs money to survive, if you can't get it legally...
Blacks, probably due to the lingering effects of discrimination, have less economic opportunity that whites. Therefore more blacks find themselves in economic difficulties that whites. Given that whites and blacks are equally prone to commit criminal acts, simply the greater number of blacks in economic difficulties would create a greater number of black criminals that white criminals.
There is no racial stereotyping here, it is nothing more than a numbers game.
Add your comment, speak your mind
(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/37921)
Very interesting post, but I don't think that it's fair to say that Bennett's caustic remark came from nowhere. The caller was arguing that if abortion were illegal social security wouldn't be in trouble. Bennett's response was right on the mark. Essentially (and not very articulately), he pointed out that if you want to defend an anti-abortion view in this way, you have to consider ALL of the consequences of criminalizing abortion -- in particular, you have to take into account the possible rise in crime.
Now, as for Bennett having a simplistic view of the causes of black crime, I'm with you all the way.