OPINION

Bush Press Conference - Left Behind

Written by Jude Nagurney Camwell
Published October 04, 2005

As usual, I felt left out of George W. Bush's America this morning. Tuning in to his press conference (the first in four long months), I heard him kowtowing to Conservatives. It was all " don't worry - Harriet's good " all the time. We all know that Bush can push his agenda down our throats without the assistance of one Democrat, but he cannot get a lot done without the support of the Conservatives of whom he's tried to convince that he is one (while he spends like a drunken sailor). He publically swore to David Gregory that he's still proudly a conservative. He flatly refused to talk about the Valerie Plame leak or who he'd remove from office if/when the indictments came down from Patrick Fitzgerald.

When he had an opportunity to state that which he personally felt he could have done better in his response to Hurricane Katrina, his very first reaction was to point fingers toward State and Local governments. He boasted about the good job he did "getting $2000 to people" after the hurricane, and waxed endlessly about people taking in strangers (which has nothing to do with his own policies which seem to concentrate on rebuilding stuctures and have little to do with rebuilding actual lives.)

Bush took down the "beer-ah-cracy" a few pegs by highlighting the private sector as the "true engine for hope and opportunity." He proclaimed a resurgence in employment of construction workers (while he suspends Davis-Bacon; the rule which would have allowed/ensured those construction workers a decent wage). Local firms are being left behind as a result of no-bid contract crony-ism.

On Harriet Miers, Bush said "I know her heart and what she believes." That's good. The question is - why should we trust the guy who lied us into an unnecessary and disastrous war - and will we ever get to know anything substantial about Harriet before she's confirmed? We certainly didn't learn much about John Roberts. The crafty Roberts avoided every opportunity to look America directly in the eye and speak in a non-legalese fashion to answer the questions that truly matter. When Bush was asked if he would release documents that might help us get to know Harriet (without Bush claiming Executive privelege), Bush's first response was "Ah-heh!," the annoying guffaw that is code for "you've got to be f--king kidding."

Speaking of that unnecessary and disastrous war, Bush has gone back to the use of the term "global struggle" to accompany discussion of the "war on terror". As you may recall, he avoided the use of the term "global struggle" this past July, and now he's revisiting the phrase. Once again attempting to convince a doubting public, Bush insisted that Iraq was part of the war on terror, or what Gen John Abizaid referred to as a "larger global struggle." If you've recently become confused about the mixed-message headlines regarding when we'll start pulling troops out of Iraq, Bush wants you to know "WE'RE NOT LEAVING IRAQ" - a direct quote. I hope that clarifies the matter. (Ah-heh).

page 1 | 2
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Buy from Amazon.com
Fooled Again Fooled Again
Mark Crispin Miller
Book,

Bush Press Conference - Left Behind
Published: October 04, 2005
Type: Opinion
Section: Politics
Filed Under: Politics: Law and Rights, Politics: U.S., Politics: International
Writer: Jude Nagurney Camwell
Jude Nagurney Camwell's BC Writer page
Jude Nagurney Camwell's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Jude Nagurney Camwell
Politics: Law and Rights
Politics: U.S.
Politics: International
All Politics Articles
Jude Nagurney Camwell's personal weblog
All Opinion articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — October 4, 2005 @ 15:14PM — Maurice

Jude

have you already convicted Bush in the Plame case or are you going to withold judgement until he is judged?

You think he should have abandoned constituional law in the Katrina case?

You don't believe the 'private sector is the fountain of all the US's success?

You think Bush should tinker with the free market by ensuring wages.

Add all these things up and what do you get?

Main Entry: fas·cism
Pronunciation: 'fa-"shi-z&m also 'fa-"si-
Function: noun
Etymology: Italian fascismo, from fascio bundle, fasces, group, from Latin fascis bundle & fasces fasces
1 often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition

#2 — October 4, 2005 @ 19:21PM — Les Slater

Jude,

I enjoyed your post even though there was not much I could agree with.

There was one thing that I think you hit right on the head though:

> Millions of good Americans realize they stand without hope for representation or successful promotion of policies that reflect one united America. President Bush is the figurehead of an extremely divided and ugly America

This isn't really new but is only now beginning to be seen. Katrina has helped this along immensely. People are pissed!

Les

P.S. Don't worry about being called a fascist. It's a word that seems to mean little amongst those that love to spit it at others.

#3 — October 4, 2005 @ 22:01PM — Jude [URL]

...have you already convicted Bush in the Plame case or are you going to withold judgement until he is judged?

What an odd question. I have never directly indicted Bush. Should I have? Is there something you know that I don't? Please tell me. I'll blog about it.

You think Bush should tinker with the free market by ensuring wages

As if tripping over himself to give his cronies all those no-bid contracts isn't "tinkering with the free market, already." Bwahaha. Wake up - smell the hypocrisy in your statement.

Fascism schmascism, Les Slater. The answer to your question You don't believe the 'private sector is the fountain of all the US's success? is that democracy is the fountain. If you claim to be an American, you belong to a venture far greater than yourself. The markets are an imperfect way to keep your society running fairly with maximum opportunity for all. Government isn't perfect, either, but we certainly cannot preclude government from protecting its citizenry from the loopholes which greed and corruption can create. You mistake democracy for fascism. That's a dangerous mistake, Les Slater. You make it at risk of losing some of your own democratic privelege and freedom.


#4 — October 4, 2005 @ 23:22PM — Les Slater

Jude,

Maybe it's just me, or something I ate, but your comment 3 seems to be confusing who you are replying to.

I did not call you a fascist nor did I say the 'private sector ...' etc. You may be thinking of comment 1 by Maurice, wich I thought was pretty nasty.

Les

#5 — October 4, 2005 @ 23:29PM — Jude [URL]

Oh, dear. Do forgive me, Les. I mistook your post for Maurice's. I guess I'm not used to the Blogcritics format. Scratch every place where I mentioned your name, Les, and replace it with Maurice.

Again, my apologies,

Jude

#6 — October 5, 2005 @ 01:15AM — Dave Nalle [URL]

Hate Bush all you like, but at least try to stick to the truth.

"He proclaimed a resurgence in employment of construction workers (while he suspends Davis-Bacon; the rule which would have allowed/ensured those construction workers a decent wage)."

Except that they ARE being paid a decent wage, higher than in many states in the area. The suspension merely lowers the wage to a level competitive in the local economy.

>> Local firms are being left behind as a result of no-bid contract crony-ism.<<

Except, of course, that no local company has the capability to do the large jobs needed, and all of the companies who got the contracts are sub-contracting individual parts of the work to local companies, so in fact locals are being employed in record numbers.

Dave

#7 — October 5, 2005 @ 09:28AM — Jude [URL]

Pointing out Bush's shortcomings and wrong-mindedness in leadership is not hate. I truist you are intelligent and mature enough to understand the difference.

President Bush is doing away with MBE, he's doing away with WBE, he's doing away with set aside programs. New Orleans is not being rebuilt by the people who most need the work. There is an opportunity, to lead that is being squandered.

Mr. Bush will go down in history as "The Squanderer". He squandered the good will and faith of the international community and the trust of his own people with the Iraq war..and he's squandering a chance to be a great leader in Katrina's aftermath.

I heard a pundit on Fox News (I think it was Dick Morris) call Bush "lucky" after Katrina, because he'd had yet another chance to lead in a national disaster.

Only the stupidest of leaders would take those golden opportunities and squander them as Bush keeps doing.

I've never seen our nation so divided and so untrusting of the bumbling, inept, misleading, greed-driven crony-hugger at the helm.

#8 — October 5, 2005 @ 10:13AM — Maurice

Jude

You do not live in a democracy. You live in a Republic. A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine.

I am not a Bush supporter (did not vote for him) but I do understand our our consitution. Your rant er... I mean blog above makes some assumptions about our government that I felt compelled to correct.

Your statement about Bush not commenting on the Plame thing (as if that were an indictment) was the reason for my first comment.

My second statement was about precedence. State and local governments are not to be interferred with (we fought our bloodiest war over that one).

You've already revealed that you have no problem with fascisim. I could tell by the tone of your post that you thought big brother should be bigger.

I apologize if my comments came off as rude. I meant to just make some observations based on your blog.

#9 — October 5, 2005 @ 15:29PM — Ron

Jude,

Read your blog for the first time. Your analysis of Bush's press conference yesterday was right on the mark! How refreshing it is to discover that I am not the only one out here who sees that the emperor has no clothes. Do not be deterred by the negative nabobs who critize your blog for daring to tell the truth. Keep up the good work!

Ron

#10 — October 5, 2005 @ 15:58PM — MCH

Jude;

Re comments 6 and 7...Keep in mind, anyone who voices an opposing opinion to Dave Nalle's is automatically labeled by Nalle as someone who "hates", ad nauseam.

#11 — October 5, 2005 @ 16:51PM — Webbie

" don't worry - Harriet's good"

How good ? Brownie good, per chance ?
;)

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/37394)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments