REVIEW

Book Review: Female Chauvinist Pigs by Ariel Levy

Written by John Zorabedian
Published September 21, 2005
page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Levy interviews the feminist author Erica Jong, who introduced the idea of the "zipless fuck," in her 1973 novel Fear of Flying, a notion of consequence-free sex for a woman like a man might enjoy:

I had to create the zipless fuck to rebel against my fifties upbringing. I told my daughter the other day, "Your generation does it, my generation only talked about it." I look at my daughter and her friends in their twenties and they are reveling in their sexuality. They don't feel guilty, and why should they? Men never did. Right now they're young and beautiful and full of energy and they don't necessarily want to have a relationship, or even have a guy stay the whole night!

But I would be happier if my daughter and her friends were crashing through the glass ceiling instead of the sexual ceiling. Being able to have an orgasm with a man you don't love, or having "Sex and the City" on television, that is not liberation. If you start to think about women as if we're all Carrie on "Sex and the City," well, the problem is: You're not going to elect Carrie to the Senate or to run your company. Let's see the Senate fifty-percent female; let's see women in decision-making positions—that's power. Sexual freedom can be a smokescreen for how far we haven't come.


The answer to the conditions of women is not more or better sex. The only solution is political. Unfortunately for progressive feminists and the left, the Christian conservative backlash against the crass popular culture of drugs, violence and sex has led to victories for pro-market Republicans, who have dominated American politics for the last 30 years. And the anti-abortion and anti0sex education agenda of the far right is hurting women even more.

As Thomas Frank, author of One Market Under God and What's the Matter With Kansas?, argues in "Red-State America Against Itself," conservative backlash against the crass consumer culture has led to more victories for the populist right, even as the real political solutions to our coarsening culture are taken off the table by neo-liberal Democrats:

Behold the political alignment that Kansas is pioneering for us all. The corporate world—for reasons having a great deal to do with its corporateness—blankets the nation with a cultural style designed to offend and to pretend-subvert: sassy teens in Skechers flout the Man; hipsters dressed in T-shirts reading "FCUK" snicker at the suits who just don't get it. It's meant to be offensive, and Kansas is duly offended. The state watches impotently as its culture, beamed in from the coasts, becomes coarser and more offensive by the year. Kansas aches for revenge. Kansas gloats when celebrities say stupid things; it cheers when movie stars go to jail. And when two female rock stars exchange a lascivious kiss on national TV, Kansas goes haywire. Kansas screams for the heads of the liberal elite. Kansas comes running to the polling place. And Kansas cuts those rock stars' taxes.
page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Book Review: Female Chauvinist Pigs by Ariel Levy
Published: September 21, 2005
Type: Review
Section: Books
Filed Under: Books: History, Books: Politics and Affairs, Books: Women, Culture: Media, Culture: Society
Writer: John Zorabedian
John Zorabedian's BC Writer page
John Zorabedian's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by John Zorabedian
Books: History
Books: Politics and Affairs
Books: Women
Culture: Media
Culture: Society
All Books Articles
All Review articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — September 21, 2005 @ 07:46AM — Bob A. Booey [URL]

Wow, great job, John. I'm very impressed -- I'll keep my eyes out for you other writing on this site. This should definitely be a Pick of the Week.

And you're reading some great stuff.

That is all.

#2 — September 25, 2005 @ 22:27PM — Temple Stark [URL]

Impressive.

I forgot everything I read with this ending though: See more thoughts at count dookie.

#3 — September 25, 2005 @ 22:35PM — Temple Stark [URL]

Books Editor Pat picked this his pick of the week. Go HERE to find out why. and thank you very much.

#4 — October 3, 2005 @ 15:20PM — fnord [URL]

>>> Being able to have an orgasm with a man you don't love, or ... that is not liberation. ... the problem is: You're not going to elect Carrie to the Senate or to run your company.

(Sigh) The same old error in thinking: "they're doing A, therefore nothing is happening with doing B." They're having more fun with sex, and so that means there won't be more women in the Senate or at the top of businesses. Hellooooo ... people can affect more than one issue at a time, especially when one issue is "recreational", shall we say, compared to the other. Male senators, and business leaders, apparently do not have to give up a strongly-expressed sexuality to be where _they_ are, so why should women?

It's the usual advocacy-fallacy of "No, don't do that!! Do this!!" Helloooo ... people can do *both* 'that' *and* 'this'.

#5 — June 13, 2006 @ 19:43PM — Tara NY [URL]

Everything in moderation. As part of this so-called sexually liberated generation the fact that women lose control of their sexuality by believing it is all that empowers them rings all too true. It does not mean we should give up our right to be sexually empowered, but that we have an obligation to our minds as well. Being healthy and loving life should not require a compromise of mind over body. Having fun times does not mean a person is happy overall. Having been there in every sense, and knowing that most men hardly enjoy my intellect as much as my face and my figure, I know that this well named "raunch feminism" is a disgrace to the ideals of feminism altogether. If this is how women are convincing themselves to become feminists once again, then I suggest we revert back to Betty Friedan. Her brand of radical allowed women to put on jeans, and never implied that women should empower themselves by turning to self degradation.

#6 — October 11, 2006 @ 22:13PM — Lauren

You're hiding, John Zorbedian. Don't. You have good stuff to say, I think. Don't be sceered - come back. I look for people like you, found you with your really good Ariel Levy review, searched and you're gone...
Real human,
Lauren

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/36558)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments