REVIEW

Book Review: Female Chauvinist Pigs by Ariel Levy

Written by John Zorabedian
Published September 21, 2005

Ariel Levy's book Female Chauvinist Pigs: Women and the Rise of Raunch Culture takes on pop culture's objectification of women, and the new breed of Paris Hilton wannabes who willingly go along, exploiting their own bodies and degrading their sexuality.

The rise of the "raunch culture," embodied by the ubiquitous Girls Gone Wild videos and the mainstreaming of pornography, represents a backlash against the anti-porn feminism of the 1970s. The popular culture now glorifies women as sexual beings, for sure, but at a price: women's liberation is now bound up in high-heeled combat boots, S&M leather and lace, and body images that fulfill male fantasies of lascivious women with no agenda beyond the bedroom.

When teenaged girls (and even younger) where thongs and t-shirts that proclaim the wearer as a "porn star," and real porn stars like Jenna Jameson are lauded as feminist icons, Levy argues, something is desperately wrong. Women have traded the Feminist Mystique for the erotic boutique.

Levy's dissection of these pop trends hints at a deeper problem with our culture's conception of what is rebellious and what is cool. Instead of agitating for equality in women's health care or equal pay for women, today's version of anti-establishment action is to pierce your naval and learn how to perform a strip-tease, what Levy coins "raunch feminism."

In an interview with Playboy CEO Christie Hefner (daughter of Hugh), Levy elicits this response to a question of why women are so interested in posing for the iconic men's magazine:

... The post-sexual revolution, post-women's movement generation that is now in their late twenties and early thirties--and then it continues with the generation behind them, too--has just a more grown-up, comfortable, natural attitude about sex and sexiness that is more in line with where guys were a couple generations before. The rabbit head symbolizes sexy fun, a little bit of rebelliousness, the same way a navel ring does ... or low-rider jeans! It's an obvious "I'm taking control of how I look and the statement I'm making," as opposed to "I'm embarrassed about it," or, "I'm uncomfortable with it."

Levy chides a group of self-proclaimed feminists, founders of the group CAKE, who argue that throwing elaborate parties featuring strippers and pornography is, in fact, radical feminism.

The authors of Manifesta: Young Women, Feminism and the Future, Jennifer Baumgardner and Amy Richards, tell Levy that dancing at a strip club, or even watching the cult TV show"Xena" is akin to volunteering at a rape crisis center or speaking out at Take Back the Night.

Levy writes:

Throwing a party where women grind against each other in their underwear while fully-clothed men watch them is suddenly part of the same project as marching on Washington for reproductive rights. According to Baumgardner and Richards, "watching TV shows (Zena! Buffy!) can ... contain feminism in action." Based on these examples, it woul seem raunch feminism is easy to achieve: The basic requirements are hot girls and small garments.
page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Book Review: Female Chauvinist Pigs by Ariel Levy
Published: September 21, 2005
Type: Review
Section: Books
Filed Under: Books: History, Books: Politics and Affairs, Books: Women, Culture: Media, Culture: Society
Writer: John Zorabedian
John Zorabedian's BC Writer page
John Zorabedian's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by John Zorabedian
Books: History
Books: Politics and Affairs
Books: Women
Culture: Media
Culture: Society
All Books Articles
All Review articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — September 21, 2005 @ 07:46AM — Bob A. Booey [URL]

Wow, great job, John. I'm very impressed -- I'll keep my eyes out for you other writing on this site. This should definitely be a Pick of the Week.

And you're reading some great stuff.

That is all.

#2 — September 25, 2005 @ 22:27PM — Temple Stark [URL]

Impressive.

I forgot everything I read with this ending though: See more thoughts at count dookie.

#3 — September 25, 2005 @ 22:35PM — Temple Stark [URL]

Books Editor Pat picked this his pick of the week. Go HERE to find out why. and thank you very much.

#4 — October 3, 2005 @ 15:20PM — fnord [URL]

>>> Being able to have an orgasm with a man you don't love, or ... that is not liberation. ... the problem is: You're not going to elect Carrie to the Senate or to run your company.

(Sigh) The same old error in thinking: "they're doing A, therefore nothing is happening with doing B." They're having more fun with sex, and so that means there won't be more women in the Senate or at the top of businesses. Hellooooo ... people can affect more than one issue at a time, especially when one issue is "recreational", shall we say, compared to the other. Male senators, and business leaders, apparently do not have to give up a strongly-expressed sexuality to be where _they_ are, so why should women?

It's the usual advocacy-fallacy of "No, don't do that!! Do this!!" Helloooo ... people can do *both* 'that' *and* 'this'.

#5 — June 13, 2006 @ 19:43PM — Tara NY [URL]

Everything in moderation. As part of this so-called sexually liberated generation the fact that women lose control of their sexuality by believing it is all that empowers them rings all too true. It does not mean we should give up our right to be sexually empowered, but that we have an obligation to our minds as well. Being healthy and loving life should not require a compromise of mind over body. Having fun times does not mean a person is happy overall. Having been there in every sense, and knowing that most men hardly enjoy my intellect as much as my face and my figure, I know that this well named "raunch feminism" is a disgrace to the ideals of feminism altogether. If this is how women are convincing themselves to become feminists once again, then I suggest we revert back to Betty Friedan. Her brand of radical allowed women to put on jeans, and never implied that women should empower themselves by turning to self degradation.

#6 — October 11, 2006 @ 22:13PM — Lauren

You're hiding, John Zorbedian. Don't. You have good stuff to say, I think. Don't be sceered - come back. I look for people like you, found you with your really good Ariel Levy review, searched and you're gone...
Real human,
Lauren

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/36558)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments