<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on The Quill Awards: New Literary Award</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2006 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:24:40 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Cicely on The Quill Awards: New Literary Award</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/08/10/101921.php#comment-448770</link>
<description>It seems like fun to have an award...even if there are plenty out there. There are plenty of books to read and plenty of people with plenty of opinions. What&#039;s the harm?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">448770@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:24:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by M. Lancaster on The Quill Awards: New Literary Award</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/08/10/101921.php#comment-213345</link>
<description>A member of my family has been nominated as an author.  She has no political or big-city connections.  I am thrilled that she has had this recognition for her first book.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">213345@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 21:39:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by parker on The Quill Awards: New Literary Award</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/08/10/101921.php#comment-202311</link>
<description>Don&#039;t the readers vote with their wallets already?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">202311@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:06:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Aaman on The Quill Awards: New Literary Award</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/08/10/101921.php#comment-202208</link>
<description>Absolute balderdash for various reasons.

Firstly, as gypsyman points out - it is self-serving and intended to generate publicity

Secondly, who needs a new book award anyway - there are enough

Thirdly, if the reading public is to judge books, the New York Times bestseller list is a fair guide to what&#039;s on top.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">202208@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2005 09:33:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>