<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Hootie and the Blowfish: <i>Looking for Lucky</i> Review</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 9 Aug 2005 17:02:16 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Matt Paprocki</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/08/09/004648.php#comment-201550</link>
<description>Just received the B Sides disc that came with pre-orders. While &lt;i&gt;Ride Along&lt;/i&gt; belongs here for all its cheesy goodness (probably their biggest guiltly pleasure ever), &lt;i&gt;I Deal&lt;/i&gt; should have been on the album, replacing &lt;i&gt;Killing Stone&lt;/i&gt;. It&#039;s a great song, and it&#039;s worth tracking this disc down if you can find it. They may still include it with orders. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">201550@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 Aug 2005 17:02:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by uao</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/08/09/004648.php#comment-200840</link>
<description>oops, meant &quot;Hootie&quot; not &quot;Hottie&quot; up there.  I wasn&#039;t talking about confirming &lt;i&gt;those&lt;/i&gt; kind of suspicions.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">200840@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 Aug 2005 00:09:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by uao</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/08/09/004648.php#comment-200839</link>
<description>This will confirm some people&#039;s worst suspicions about me, but I&#039;ve always thought old Hottie and the Blowfish were unfairly slagged on during their whole existence.

For what they are, a bar band, they&#039;ve put together quite a little body of what the reviewer calls &lt;i&gt;&quot;enjoyable, addictive, and easy to listen to&quot;&lt;/i&gt; music, an apt desciption I won&#039;t quibble with.

Which is why they&#039;ve always taken so much guff since their debut.  It&#039;s not like they&#039;ve ever pretended to be Nirvana, or Phish, or Smashing Pumpkins or anything.

They do play well together, Rucker&#039;s voice ia affable enough and has enough grit to carry a well-constructed roots rock song.

They&#039;re not deep, not intellectual, not arty, not tough, not edgy; but consistently melodic, vaguely soulful, traditionalist, unpretentious-- not bad things. 

I have some Hootie and The Blowfish in my 18,000 tune randomplay, not a lot, but a couple dozen.  When &quot;Old Man And Me&quot; comes on, it&#039;ll sometimes get me singing along.

Hope their new album is good.  The poor guy was doing Burger King ads in the Spring.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">200839@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 Aug 2005 00:08:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>