REVIEW

War of the Worlds (2005) Review

Written by Matt Paprocki
Published July 03, 2005

*Small spoilers inside

It's hardly fair to judge this big budget adaptation of War of the Worlds based on the plot holes. The 1898 book is a classic (and it should be), so by ripping this Steven Spielberg piece, you're also ripping the H.G. Wells novel. There are parts of the film, including the horrible, incomprehensible ending, that make it a bare that are the filmmaker's fault. The rest of the time, it's one of the best alien invasion movies in decades, and that's simply because it closely follows the story as written in a new era.

The film opens with a brilliant shot of foreshadowing, letting those that have seen the original film version and read the book know little has changed here. It wastes little time in getting started after that. The first half hour contains more destruction, brutal mayhem, and action then most straight disaster films. This one draws you in early, giving you enough of what you came to see from the start, so it has the opportunity to slow down and move on with its characters.

It closely follows the three main actors, Tom Cruise and his two children (including Dakota Fanning who is simply amazing here). It offers an amazing sense of being in a situation none of us will likely ever encounter, and making it all believable. Most of the death and destruction occurs from a human point of view. It gives the spectacular alien tripods immense weight and size, and the special effects never once manage to pull the viewer out of the film.

More proof to that is the scene in which out military begins their assault. As missiles, rocket launchers, helicopters, and tanks blast away at the advancing enemy, the camera focuses on Tom Cruise fighting with his son. The after effect of the military struggle is when the characters become involved, and we see that in fantastic detail.

Those opening moments (where most of the budget was likely spent) do cause the second half to drag in spots. You simply can't tell an audience "This is what the movie will be like" and pull out. Numerous scenes could have been cut without harming anything. By the hour mark, we're all well aware Tom Cruise's character is a bad father; there's no need to keep showing us.

page 1 | 2
Matt Paprocki is the reviews editor for Digital Press, a video game website with an appreciation for the retro side of the industry. The deep game collection which spans nearly 30 systems and 2,000 games line his walls for research purposes. Matt strives to bring credibility to video game journalism, and take it in a new direction to aid the industry in becoming respected with all forms entertainment media.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
War of the Worlds (2005) Review
Published: July 03, 2005
Type: Review
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Action, Video: Adventure, Video: Horror, Video: SF
Writer: Matt Paprocki
Matt Paprocki's BC Writer page
Matt Paprocki's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Matt Paprocki
Video: Action
Video: Adventure
Video: Horror
Video: SF
All Video Articles
All Review articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — July 3, 2005 @ 19:34PM — johnnysandiego

The special effects were state of the art as expected. The rest was terrible. I was not expecting a morality play about a disfunctional family with screwy teens and dumb dads. The city dwellers were absolutly not believable. The mechanic who was more concerned about returning the only car that worked to his customer than saving his life is a good example. Tim Robbins as a nutcase or child molester is another one. Drama yes. Terror no. What a stupid ending. Hurry for the microbes. I think I'll go out and adopt one.

Save your money, rent the original and turn out the lights in the living room.

#2 — July 3, 2005 @ 20:14PM — DMD

The ending almost seemed tacked on, as if an original one hadn't screened well or something.

#3 — July 5, 2005 @ 13:07PM — SG

...Special Effects within first 30 minutes are awesome and continue to be great right after the aweful acting and depressing thoughts of civilian panic and murder for survival... I wish the main actor story rotated around several characters such as a fire man's viewpoint, a european reporter viewpoint and a stripper protecting her family as in ' Independance Day '... I think Tom Cruise lost a lot of fans through his off-screen crazy moments and then this movie was a poor choice because Tom's character can not sing a simple lullaby and starts singing Beach Boys during an alien invasion to calm his daughter... what a shallow script... It's not much better than SuperMan I style of effects and acting methods... OverAll rating ( 1 to 10 ): 7.0 ( because the special computer effects, pyrotech, alien characters and special camera work during a mini-van conversation... )

... SG


.

#4 — July 6, 2005 @ 19:42PM — Mark

I disagree with most of the above comments. I thought the film was really good, the acting was suberb and the effects were simply amazing. Sure the ending seemed a bit odd, but how else could a film producer end it without it resulting in the worlds destruction or else having the same corny ending that all Sci-Fi movies have? Overall I would give this film a 9/10.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/31984)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments