REVIEW

Book Review: Stranger in a Strange Land by Robert Heinlein

Written by Bruce Kratofil
Published June 29, 2005

A couple of days before vacation, and I made a quick trip to the library for some reading material. While cruising down the aisle that held Sci Fi on one side and Mysteries on the other, I saw Stranger in a Strange Land by Robert Heinlein, published in 1961. It was a book on my mental list of "Hey, you should try to read this some day" books, so I picked it up and was immediately fascinated.

The first trip by humans to Mars, since it was so long, was undertaken by four married couples. Valentine Michael Smith, who was conceived during the trip (but whose mother and father were married to other astronauts) was the only survivor of this voyage. He was raised by Martians, and endowed with some of their powers, which are supernatural in terms of Earth. The second voyage to Mars, 25 years later, finds him and brings him back to Earth. The book is about his struggle to adjust, and then dominate, and then die here after founding his own Martian-based religion.

It is a fascinating book on many different levels. There are clear parallels to Kipling's The Jungle Book, of a human raised by non-humans. It is a study of semantics; when asked "Feel like breakfast?" he thinks he may be the main course. (By the way, being eaten is not considered bad if you are a Martian.) It is a study of philosophy and religion, along with the science fiction There's also a touch of Elmer Gantry in it. Rather than write another straightforward review of a 45-year-old classic, let's take advantage of the fact that its a look into the future from 45 years ago, and see how close the technology and "history" in the book worked as predictors of what's actually taken place. To do that, we have to estimate when the events of the book take place.

There is no specific date given in the book—it's not the year 2525, or anything like that. However, we are given a year relative to when the first lunar colony was established. What year might that have been to Heinlein, writing in the late 1950s for a book released in 1961? JFK's speech pledging to reach the moon within the decade was given on September 12, 1962, approximately one year after the book was released. But it could certainly be a reasonable assumption that Heinlein could have envisioned a moon landing by 1970 or so. If we could make it to the moon by 1970, then a reasonable SF writer may assume that by 1980 a lunar colony would have been established. (After all, why expend all that effort to get to the moon, and then just ignore it? That would be foolish.) The first trip to Mars was eight years after the colony was established, so now we are approximately up to 1988. The second trip to Mars was 25 years after that - part of the interruption was caused by World War III. So that brings us to 2013, approximately eight years into the future from now, as one estimate of when the events took place. By being more optimistic on the speed to the moon, or the establishment of a colony, you may even be able to get the envisioned time frame of the book to approximately now. A little bit pessimistic, and it is further out. But I think it's safe to say that the events in the novel take place within our technological ballpark.

page 1 | 2 | 3
Bruce Kratofil blogs on bugs and other things that can go wrong with your computer at The BugBlog, and writes about computers and economics at BJK Research
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Buy from Amazon.com
Stranger in a Strange Land Stranger in a Strange Land
Robert A. Heinlein
Book,
The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress
Robert A. Heinlein
Book,
Starship Troopers Starship Troopers
Robert A. Heinlein
Book,
Job: A Comedy of Justice Job: A Comedy of Justice
Robert A. Heinlein
Book,
Red Planet (A Del Rey Book) Red Planet (A Del Rey Book)
Robert A. Heinlein
Book,
The Jungle Book (Limited Issue) The Jungle Book (Limited Issue)
DVD,
Elmer Gantry (Signet Classics) Elmer Gantry (Signet Classics)
Mark Schorer
Book,

Book Review: Stranger in a Strange Land by Robert Heinlein
Published: June 29, 2005
Type: Review
Section: Books
Filed Under: Books: SF
Writer: Bruce Kratofil
Bruce Kratofil's BC Writer page
Bruce Kratofil's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Bruce Kratofil
Books: SF
All Books Articles
Bruce Kratofil's personal weblog
All Review articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — June 29, 2005 @ 14:54PM — The Theory

man, i read this back when I was, like, 14... since it's been, what? 6 years since then I don't really remember the book. I just remember enjoying it.

I should re-read that, actually.

#2 — June 29, 2005 @ 15:57PM — Bennett

It's funny that you mention Scientology, as the story is that Hubbard and Heinlein were knocking back a few and decided to see who could write a better book about a "new religion".

Heinlein wrote "Stranger", L.Ron started Scientology.

I do have to objet to your representation of where we stand regarding a moon colony.

We ARE mounting a huge effort, there IS the political will to get it done (mainly to preempt China I think), and NASA's Return to Earth Orbit happens on July 13th.

Otherwise I enjoyed your review of a book I must have read 5 times, at least. It's highly entertaining!

#3 — June 29, 2005 @ 16:06PM — Bruce Kratofil [URL]

Bennett,

If we are mounting a huge effort, it's flying under my radar. I actually thought about mentioning the Chinese, but the review was just getting too long.

I think a problem with the space effort, at least as far as govt. efforts, is that the number one goal is to never have anything go wrong and never have an astronaut die. That makes secondary goals, like the Moon or Mars, hard to reach.

#4 — June 29, 2005 @ 16:47PM — Bennett

Bruce,

Too true, but with a new NASA administrator in place, one who understands risk vs accomplishment, the environment at NASA is changing rapidly.

Here is a short BC post on this.

And with private industy being encouraged to take up some of the action that historically was kept within NASA, things are beginning to move very fast indeed.

We live in exciting times.

#5 — June 29, 2005 @ 17:09PM — Michael

Which version did you read? His widow released an "Unabridged" version in the 90s that adds about another 1/3 to the book, much of it sexually-charged. It makes Michael Valentine a more complete person... even if a horn-dog.

#6 — June 29, 2005 @ 17:20PM — Bruce Kratofil [URL]

Michael --

I read the version that's pictured on the page above; or at least, that's what the cover looks like. The date, which comes up automatically from Amazon, says 1995 here, although the printing date on the copyright page of the book says 1987. The copyright date is still 1961.

As I was reading it, I thought it was somewhat sexually charged for 1961, althrough it wouldn't raise an eyebrow today. Maybe I read the unabridged, but I don't know.

#7 — June 29, 2005 @ 19:19PM — DrPat [URL]

The version from '95 is the original (edited) release. The "author's original" version (I've reread both recently) is proof positive that even a great writer like RAH needed an editor...

#8 — June 29, 2005 @ 19:23PM — Michael [URL]

This is the book in which Heinlein invents the waterbed.

#9 — June 29, 2005 @ 22:17PM — gonzo marx [URL]

folks,

READ THIS BOOK!!

it is my Opinion that Heinlein is to the 20th century what Twain was to the 19th

i consider him one of the most Important authors from America, and if there can be said to be a single individual that inspired our space program, it would be RAH...

over 80% of NASA staff up until the mid 90's state that they got into space tech because of Heinlein

he was so influential that the other authors of sci fi had to invent the "Grand Master" award

this book, originally titled "the Sound of his Wings" was a project he worked on and stepped away from for most of his earlier career, and makes a demarcation between his earlier "hard science" fiction and his creation of what he called "speculative fiction"

this book was not so much about tech and hardware as it was about speculation and observation of sociopolitical trends and cultural observations, and is clearly a step into Literature as opposed to the genre's pulp origins

i consider it not only an Important work in american literature, but also the only example of an Objectivist Gnostic Myth

his "Universal Church of Truth" provided repeatable and observable "miracles" which anyone could learn once they had mastered the Knowledge of the Martian language...and the "mythological" twist of the main Protagonists ultimate Fate is a metaphysical dual edged sword that may take some people more than a single reading to "grok in fullness"

this is a modern "Passion" displayed as nothing more than engaging and entertaining Literature...what more can one ask from a book?

two other "must reads" from this Author are shown at the bottom of the Post...

the Moon is a Harsh Mistress is another sociopolitical exploration that teaches about civics, revolution and politics...all the while being one hell of an entertaining Story

and Job: a Comedy of Justice is both a poke at dogma and an inspiring love story that can stand with anything

so sayeth yer gonzo

Excelsior!

#10 — June 29, 2005 @ 22:41PM — Bennett

READ THIS BOOK!!

Dead nuts on gonzo. Thanks for saying the things I would have said had I been you.

#11 — June 30, 2005 @ 18:41PM — Michael

The unabridged has a black cover and explicitly states that it is the "complete and unabridged" version. It won't offer any huge differences in the story, merely extending and enhancing it a bit.

#12 — June 30, 2005 @ 18:56PM — gonzo marx [URL]

my copy of the unabridged is a red leather bound and gilt edged pages

i also have a first edition, as well as the same paperback shown in the Post

if memory serves, the unabridged is about 80,000 words longer, and the biggest difference is in the conversation between Jubal and Ben concerning what happened in the Nest one evening that made Ben run away

a bit racy for 1961, but would earn a PG at best today

read the book

nuff said?

Excelsior!

#13 — June 30, 2005 @ 20:30PM — Jan

Thanks for this review. What memories it raises about the whole Heinlein list. If you liked this, be sure to check out:
Time Enough for Love
The Past Through Tomorrow
I Will Fear No Evil

I found them tremendously mind stretching re cultural assumptions of gender, family identity, and lots of steamy stuff for a late teen of my day [the 70s]. I think many of us thought of his stuff as really 'underground' then.

Complete bibliography at:
http://www.fantasticfiction.co.uk/authors/Robert_Heinlein.htm

I think I'll check my library and rethink what the stories were really about. I would imagine I'll have a completely different reaction as a middle-aged adult!

#14 — June 30, 2005 @ 20:36PM — Bruce Kratofil [URL]

It appears we have some real Heinlein fans here.

Anyone else want to take a crack at what year the story takes place?

#15 — June 30, 2005 @ 20:57PM — Bennett

As you said, he overestimated some technology, and didn't plan on having Senator Proxmire kill off funding for NASA in the 80's.

I'd say 2030 is a good bet for both the societal feel, as well as where our space program will be. What scares me is that we may have to go through a version "If This Goes On" where the government becomes a Religious Dictatorship. That story is in "Future History", a great collection of Heinlein at his best.

Also:

Tunnel In The Sky
Farnham's Freehold
Glory Road
Orphans Of The Sky
The Door Into Summer

All stand outs.


#16 — July 31, 2005 @ 13:23PM — CP

I've just read 'stranger', the first Heinlein book i've ever read. I picked the book in a second hand shop at random, not realising the importance of Heinlein... Well, now i Grok how great an author he is... for a couple of days after finishing 'stranger' i kept using grok in conversation by accident, and people gave me funny looks...fair enough!
The 'religion' of water brothers is pretty impossible, but would be great, in an ideal world.

The book has some great observations of religion, faith and just about everything, but it certainly doesn't offer a solution...unless his prediction of marshun lifestyle is as accurate as his other 'predictions'... which of course it is not. It is certainly not a novel to be taken too literaly in that respect!

Also it is really funny! When it starts describing the 'gods' looking down on earth it, straightening their halos, it is a reminder to not take the whole thing too seriously. Apparently some people set up cults based on Michael's ideas. Pretty dumb really! They missed the point i think... If there is a point as such... i'm not so sure there is you know, beyond telling the truth as Heinlein sees it. Great book though. It reminds me of the problem posed at the end of Asimov's foundation and earth. And Michael is a similar character to R. Daneel Olivaw don't you think? From innocence to omnipotence.

#17 — March 2, 2006 @ 14:46PM — lucas

i am reading this book it is very weird. i could not realize how different some one would act from a different planet. we are going to the moon but not to mars, yet. this book is weird having a grown man learn most what a baby knows. i am still reading it. this book is really good.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/31780)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments