<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on Snapple's biggest mistake</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 2 May 2006 22:22:03 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Tom hanks</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/06/22/180331.php#comment-362180</link>
<description>I loved the terminal</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">362180@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 May 2006 22:22:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tom Hanks</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/06/22/180331.php#comment-362175</link>
<description>What does this have to do with the Da vinci code</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">362175@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 May 2006 22:18:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mark Adams</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/06/22/180331.php#comment-171261</link>
<description>&quot;turkeys BREAD for Thanksgiving&quot; -- and if I fix it, your comment won&#039;t make sense, so I&#039;ll keep it. I only added the qualifier since turkeys can fly, but I&#039;m not sure about Butterball.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">171261@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 16:13:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by El Bicho</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/06/22/180331.php#comment-171041</link>
<description>so did Howard Stern.  When will someone release his WOR shows?!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">171041@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 04:17:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Phillip Winn</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/06/22/180331.php#comment-171035</link>
<description>I always thought it has something to do with firing Rush Limbaugh as a sponsor. Love him or hate him, the man sold that beverage like it was necessary for human life.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">171035@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 03:09:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by dee</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/06/22/180331.php#comment-170940</link>
<description>Actually, snapple&#039;s biggest mistake was firing the first woman they had as a spokesperson in their commericials. She was great. The beverage did the deep six after that.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">170940@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 23:40:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Chris Beaumont</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/06/22/180331.php#comment-170915</link>
<description>Mmmmmmmm..... turkey bread.......</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">170915@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 22:47:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by nona</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/06/22/180331.php#comment-170848</link>
<description>from your snapple story &quot;turkeys BREAD for Thanksgiving&quot;.....never heard of turkey bread - but I&#039;ve heard of a turkey BRED for a particular purpose....you made me laugh....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">170848@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 19:49:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Victor Plenty</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/06/22/180331.php#comment-170835</link>
<description>Not a scientist by trade, but some of my education is in the sciences, so I&#039;ll have a go at explaining this. Can&#039;t get any worse than all the attempts to explain politics we see around here.

It sounds like the giant Snapplesicle may not have been frozen very solidly in the first place.

Even if it was, it would not have to melt all at once to cause the situation described. The sun would only need to get it slushy enough to lose its structural integrity. Gravity could easily do the rest of the work, sending slushy fragments crashing to the ground, where impact would further break them up and distribute them in every direction.

Mountaineers are probably not surprised by this, being intimately familiar with the unpredictable and sudden conversion of glaciers and snow banks into avalanches.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">170835@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 19:07:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tan The Man</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/06/22/180331.php#comment-170823</link>
<description>Yeah, I read that. 80 degrees isn&#039;t THAT hot? Maybe the humidity has something to do with it to? Maybe? Scientists, help?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">170823@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 18:36:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>