<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Film Noir on Paper: Ross Macdonald Mysteries</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2005 01:03:36 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Victor Plenty</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/06/09/232521.php#comment-165730</link>
<description>Didn&#039;t &quot;film noir&quot; start out on paper? The Bogart films and others in that genre were mostly based on the hard-boiled detective novels that had already been popular for decades when they were filmed, if I recall correctly.

So the phrase &quot;film noir on paper&quot; strikes me as odd, like someone saying Errol Flynn swashbuckler movies ripped off George Lucas.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">165730@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2005 01:03:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by francisco68</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/06/09/232521.php#comment-165721</link>
<description>Dr. Pat. The problem is the world has changed over 50 years.  It is closer to a &quot;revolution of rising expectations&quot;. Macdonald has some fights and 3 murders in 
&lt;i/&gt;Find A Victim&lt;/i&gt;.  Today the murder book set needs a series of bodies, something supernatural, or something grotesque.  I would say it is more Macdonald&#039;s roadside hamburger joint to Hannibal&#039;s MacDonald&#039;s factory produced sandwiches.

Phillip Winn is undoubtedly right.  They would be good read aloud or seen in a 1940&#039;s or 50&#039;s film noir movie.  This one wasn&#039;t but its cousins were.

I might have read it aloud but my wife grabbed it first and gobbled it up.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">165721@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2005 00:30:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Phillip Winn</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/06/09/232521.php#comment-165602</link>
<description>These books sound like they&#039;d would be even better read aloud. True?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">165602@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2005 17:58:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by DrPat</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/06/09/232521.php#comment-165323</link>
<description>You imply a great question here, man - why do we &quot;jade ourselves&quot; with such dark stuff as cannibalism, serial killers, and slasher movies? Is Macdonald just the marijuana to &lt;em&gt;Hannibal&lt;/em&gt;&#039;s crack-cocaine?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">165323@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2005 10:24:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>