<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Steve Jobs confirms Apple switch to Intel</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 5 Sep 2005 18:17:39 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Temple Stark</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/06/06/141919.php#comment-225697</link>
<description>The Chicago breed of geek is lacking what  we non-geeks like to call &quot;common sense&quot; :-)</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">225697@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Sep 2005 18:17:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Chicago Geek</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/06/06/141919.php#comment-225694</link>
<description>Soon Apple will adopt MS Windows too and look for new ventures in other areas instead of investing too much only on computing.


DTS.....................
http://www.jobs.co.in/</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">225694@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Sep 2005 18:15:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by TDavid</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/06/06/141919.php#comment-163518</link>
<description>BTW, Eric - forgot to say hello back on your first comment :) Hope all is going well with you and yours ;)</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">163518@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 Jun 2005 00:48:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by TDavid</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/06/06/141919.php#comment-163517</link>
<description>Dave didn&#039;t say how long he had it, Tan. If he had it for a long time then it&#039;s probably performed pretty well for him ;) Better than Microsoft stock the last five years.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">163517@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 Jun 2005 00:47:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tan Hoang</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/06/06/141919.php#comment-163506</link>
<description>Well, Apple stock has always really been a long-term investment. Anyone looking for a quick buck shouldn&#039;t be buying Apple stock to begin with.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">163506@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 Jun 2005 00:36:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by TDavid</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/06/06/141919.php#comment-163503</link>
<description>Apple stock has done well the last couple months. Up 6% :) Might want to hold onto at least some of it and ride it out, Dave. This could be a brilliant ... or devasting move by Apple. Time will tell.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">163503@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 Jun 2005 00:34:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Dave Nalle</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/06/06/141919.php#comment-163496</link>
<description>Good lord, is this for real?  Time to dump my Apple stock.

Dave</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">163496@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 Jun 2005 00:29:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tan Hoang</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/06/06/141919.php#comment-163492</link>
<description>I think he idea of having the same processor that the X-Box 360 is a nice marketing line to have. A dual-processor Mac seems very powerful, plus the Intel chips are said to go to the low-end computers like the Mac Mini and eMac, so the high end probably will still be updated, but probably won&#039;t hit the magical 3 Ghz barrier. When I planned to buy a computer next year, that was what I wanted: a dual-processor 3 ghz PowerMac. But alas, I don&#039;t think I&#039;ll get my wish.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">163492@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 Jun 2005 00:27:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by TDavid</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/06/06/141919.php#comment-163270</link>
<description>Good thinking there Floris. Over the next 18 months it makes one wonder why buy an Apple. That&#039;s what Laporte was concerned about and he makes a good point. If one doesn&#039;t _have_ to buy a Mac, then they probably will wait. That won&#039;t bode well for the all important Christmas season 2005 unless they can roll out a new iPod that everybody has to have.

Perhaps something with WiFi?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">163270@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 6 Jun 2005 16:44:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Floris Vermeir</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/06/06/141919.php#comment-163224</link>
<description>Intresting, I wonder could this mean that any of the following mini mac&#039;s,
would use intel. That would be a serious concurence for the already existing small desktop systems.

It could also lead to reuse of mini mac like system in new ways. One could for example take the system boards whith processor, memory and hardive connected to it out, and then use them as the max equivalent of blade servers. On of the  current difficulties on that path is that there would need to be a  a kind of main board and connectors, that allow the system boards to be connected to it, whitout loosing to much speed. 

A likewise system could be done using subboards and suns pico jave chips on a subboard together whith for example 256 mb of ram, and those subboards connected onto a main board.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">163224@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 6 Jun 2005 15:56:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tan Hoang</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/06/06/141919.php#comment-163185</link>
<description>All of my mac sites are offline for the conference... glad to finally here it.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">163185@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 6 Jun 2005 14:59:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/06/06/141919.php#comment-163180</link>
<description>thanks TD, big news and nice to see you!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">163180@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 6 Jun 2005 14:47:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>