<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on American Tabloid</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 May 2005 15:52:11 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Mat Brewster</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/29/110721.php#comment-160073</link>
<description>I&#039;m right in the middle of the Cold Six Thousand right now and am finding it a chore to get through.  His &quot;terse&quot; style is just irritating by this point.  I just want to scream &lt;i&gt;write a sentence longer than four words!&lt;/i&gt;

So, would you recommend the LA trilogy HW?  I&#039;ve heard good things about it, but am feeling a little burned out trying to get through TCST.  

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">160073@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2005 15:52:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by  HW Saxton</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/29/110721.php#comment-160017</link>
<description>James Ellroy does that same thing with
several historical characters in the L.A
trilogy (Black Dahlia,The Big Nowhere &amp;
L.A. Confidential).The characters are
either barely disguised or he takes off
on some trivia point involving that
person and exxagerates it almost to the 
point of fiction. Makes for some good 
reading at times as it can be funny and
at other times it&#039;s just irritating as
hell. I used to like Ellroy but upon re-
reading the three mentioned above very 
recently I don&#039;t think he holds up well.
Rather re-read my Chandler books for the
umpteenth times.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">160017@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2005 12:44:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by DrPat</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/29/110721.php#comment-160006</link>
<description>If I were totally cynical, I would say that your point (&lt;em&gt;There aren&#039;t any good guys in this novel. Anybody who starts out with anything close to a normal set of morals has completely lost them by story&#039;s end...&lt;/em&gt;) comes as no surprise - the book is about tabloid journalism and politicians, after all...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">160006@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2005 11:40:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Nick Jones</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/29/110721.php#comment-159846</link>
<description>&lt;I&gt;American Tabloid&lt;/I&gt; is my second-favorite Ellroy novel (&lt;I&gt;L.A. Confidential&lt;/I&gt; being the first). I love the twists and turns the three lead characters take as the novel progresses, the (fictional) eavesdropping on the conversations of J. Edgar Hoover, JFK, Howard Hughes, et al., the raw and explicit violence of violent men. 

The sequel, &lt;I&gt;The Cold Six Thousand&lt;/I&gt;, while following new and old characters up to the assasination of Bobby Kennedy, is much less accomplished, and crosses over the line where you start to wonder if the racism of the characters is shared by Ellroy himself.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">159846@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2005 11:59:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>