<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on <i>Chaotic</i>: Oops!...I Did it Again</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 1 Jun 2005 03:53:13 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by alienboy</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/25/002611.php#comment-160844</link>
<description>Re your comparison of the irritating and pointless Britney factory pop with the charged genius of Michael Jackson - this is like comparing pondlife with a mammal!

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">160844@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Jun 2005 03:53:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Pete Blackwell</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/25/002611.php#comment-158345</link>
<description>Yes, quite the artiste. Another shock (or not) has been hearing her real singing voice. You couldn&#039;t make a better advertisement for the sophistication of today&#039;s studio technology.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">158345@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 23:38:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tom Johnson</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/25/002611.php#comment-158268</link>
<description>I do get a kick out of her crediting herself with &quot;cinematography&quot; in the credits.  That&#039;s a mighty grand word for pointing a handycam at yourself while you make faces.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">158268@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 18:10:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tom Johnson</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/25/002611.php#comment-158264</link>
<description>I&#039;m pretty sure Brit is craftily stupid, actually - she &lt;em&gt;thinks&lt;/em&gt; she&#039;s much smarter than people give her credit for being, but in reality we&#039;ve been right all along.  She doesn&#039;t even seem to realize that the very series she has created in order to nullify those claims is doing exactly the opposite.

&lt;em&gt;Episode two finds her glassy-eyed and stoned in the back seat of a car in Copenhagen cracking up over fart jokes.&lt;/em&gt;

Without a doubt, she proves what great mother material she is.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">158264@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 18:09:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mary K. Williams</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/25/002611.php#comment-157971</link>
<description>I&#039;ve not seen the show, but then I&#039;m not a fan of reality TV anyway. I don&#039;t know if Brit is stupid or crafty, but the whole thing is sad.

 I think when you&#039;re at the point of deliberately putting such intimate moments in the public eye - there&#039;s already a problem.

I don&#039;t know how &#039;Trista and Ryan&#039; are doing, but that whole wedding thing on TV made me gag. Same thing with Jess and Nick, Amber and Rob, etc. Are we supposed to really care?

Whoa - I&#039;m getting dizzy up here on the soap box...someone help me down.

marykay</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">157971@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 07:05:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>