lying | the art of poetry & of writing
Published May 21, 2005
Always I had promised myself that I would "never ever ever" get involved with a writer. Writers are difficult, needy, emotional, fucked up. I knew, because I was one and am one and most of my friends were writers and more, I taught writing and was constantly surrounded by writers since my occupation has always been in publishing, I was and am constantly exposed to other authors. I worried that because I knew from my own experience that writers can spin tall tales, that this would carry over to our personal life, and while I knew that I was not and am not a liar in my every day life, I wasn't naïve enough to believe that everyone else shared my views. I knew that my definition of lying and deceit were simplified, stripped to the bone in many ways - white lie, black lie, fib, omission, half-truths, "forgetting to tell", the "it wasn't important" and so on are not differentiated in my view. A lie is a lie is a lie.
All deceit is hurtful. Just say no. I should know - I have been deceitful in my life. I have done awful things and to my horror, I was good at it. Once upon a time, I found myself lying to someone I deeply loved with considerable ease. No, it wasn't "easy", but it wasn't that hard either. We find our convenient rationales, make up excuses, anything to not feel the guilt that deep-down, we feel anyway.
So live and learn . It was one thing to spin stories for publication or for the fun of it on paper. It was another thing entirely to bend and stretch reality in such a way that you conceal who you really are - that by your deceit, you prevent your spouse or your family or friends from the truth. They are people who need the truth in order to make an informed decision about your involvement in their life. I may lie in poetry, or I may not, depending on the poem, but always, I live honestly, or I do my best to live an honest life, which is all anyone can do, and though I hate people who say this, we are fallible, we are human, and we screw up in the most spectacular ways. Better to try to confine this to fiction. It is the best we can hope for..
I have received long emails from complete strangers who read my work and then think they understand me. It tells me, The poem was effective, but does this complete stranger know me? Absolutely not. Poetry, at its best, can be seductive and convincing. It is what we strive for. That there will be strangers who then think they understand the poet seems to be an occupational hazard, and the better you become, the more refined your art, the more likely this is to be the case. It never occurs to the reader that the work that appears to be so revealing may simply be a layer of protection; a misleading sign-post that serves as misinformation to redirect the reader away from the actual truth, turning them instead to the truth of the poem (and entirely different matter).
- lying | the art of poetry & of writing
- Published: May 21, 2005
- Type: Opinion
- Section: Culture
- Filed Under: Culture: Arts, Culture: Media
- Writer: Sadi Ranson-Polizzotti
- Sadi Ranson-Polizzotti's BC Writer page
- Sadi Ranson-Polizzotti's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
i think there is a misunderstanding here: i didn't "feature" that book. i just had to put some writing books from amazon - as is the rule here, as you know - and that was among the first books to come up. I did not review ANY book here. It is an opinion piece and highly subjective -- sorry if that wasn't clear to you. I thought it was quite clear. my apologies - ...
thanks for reading
sadi
Sorry Sadi...
I know you made no specific mention of the book. I only used the word "featured" to make it clearer which book I meant.
The reason I pointed out disliking it was not anything about you, but just for anyone who might think the book looked interesting.
Now you changed the book and people will think I'm crazy anyhow! Seein' things! :D
sorry, N - i changed the book because i fundamentally agree with you. Annie Lamott's book is far superior and a GREAT book, if you haven't read it -- do check it out (tho you've prob. read). But no, don't feel bad. I just wanted to be clear that this wasn't a review or an endorsement of any particular book, but really just an opinion piece written by a writer and an editor. It came up because so many people took my poems, in particular, as very autobiographical. And while some are, some are not. It's always a mistake to think someone can sum you up that simply : we are complex, all of us, and i was sort of annoyed that anyone would presume to know me that intimately just by reading my work. I mean, on the one hand, it said the work was convincing, effective, all good things, but it was the conclusion that bothered me.
anyway, i could go on and on, as i do in the article; so will let that do the talking. if you want, you can visit my poetry etc. (that is relavent to this piece by going to www.tantmieux.squarespace.com
thanks again ;-) - no worries
sadi






Very interesting. I'm not great with poetry...or good with poetry...or average!
I would like to say that I have a gawd-awful amount of books on writing, and the one I liked the least was the featured book...Writing Down the Bones. Maybe it's better with a poetic temperament, but it felt like a waste of money for me!