NEWS

Bloggers Up in Arms Over Linda Foley's Comments

Written by Myopic Zeal
Published May 20, 2005

The new media is buzzing with reactions to Linda Foley's comments. Like Eason Jordan, she accuses our miltary of targeting journalists. But unlike Eason Jordan, her remarks were caught on tape. Ms. Foley is noteworthy because she is the president of both the Newspaper Guild and Communication Workers of America (the nation's largest broadcast and journalism workers union).

[Ed: If you're not familiar with the Eason Jordan controversy, there's a great overview here.]

WorldNetDaily has the quote from the 2005 National Conference for Media Reform in St. Louis:

Foley said, "Journalists, by the way, are not just being targeted verbally or ... ah, or ... ah, politically. They are also being targeted for real, um ... in places like Iraq. What outrages me as a representative of journalists is that there's not more outrage about the number, and the brutality, and the cavalier nature of the U.S. military toward the killing of journalists in Iraq."

Foley continued, "They target and kill journalists ... uh, from other countries, particularly Arab countries like Al -, like Arab news services like al-Jazeera, for example. They actually target them and blow up their studios with impunity. ..."

The video of her comments can be found here (mirrored here and streamed here).

Here some reactions from around the blogosphere on the comments of Linda Foley. The big theme is "Eason Jordan Deja Vu."

Daily Inklings:

Remember Eason Jordan? He made unsubstantiated accusations that US troops targeted journalists for murder, then backpedalled and wouldn't allow the tapes of his outrageous comments be released? Well right at the heels of Newsweek's attempt at damage control over a now-retracted story regarding Gitmo personnel and the koran which had caused widespread rioting and the deaths of 16 people, another journalist makes inflammatory Eason Jordan-type statements without proof. Her name is Linda Foley. This time, however, there is a tape of her statements:

Mr. Preston at Junkyard Blog observes the lack of evidence to back up her claim, and says if she can't back it up, she needs to step down.

Linda Foley had better offer proof of what she said or step down from her jobs. Tossing up unsubstantiated smears of the US military, especially in light of what Newsweek's smear led to in Afghanistan last week, is unconscionable and unacceptable.

John Cole also wants evidence.

If journalists are being targeted, reasonable people want to know about it. Unfortunately, just like Eason Jordan learned, we want some flipping evidence.

The Word Unheard address Ms. Foley:

Your assault on the honor of the American Military will not stand. We will not allow you to wildly accuse us of murder. Your words may ring pleasant among friends and colleagues, but for us they ring stirringly like the deep toll of a bell.

I. Rony (hah!) thinks the Union members ought to step up to the plate.

If you are a member of TNG or CWA and you are outraged by this, then let your union and your fellow union members know. You are the unions source of money, so you're voice will be heard above others.
page 1 | 2
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Bloggers Up in Arms Over Linda Foley's Comments
Published: May 20, 2005
Type: News
Section: Politics
Writer: Myopic Zeal
Myopic Zeal's BC Writer page
Myopic Zeal's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Myopic Zeal
All Politics Articles
Myopic Zeal's personal weblog
All News articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — May 20, 2005 @ 22:06PM — RJ [URL]

We need an Amazon link...

#2 — May 20, 2005 @ 22:08PM — Matt

Wow. Bloggers up in arms? Call a fucking congressional committee, then. This is big stuff. We can't have political bloggers up in arms.

John Cole wants evidence? Holy shit! Big news!

Mr. Preston and Junkyard Blog thinks Foley should step down? Earth shattering!

There has never been a greater divide than there is between how important political bloggers think they are, and how important they actually are.

I hope this one hits Google's front page. Its big news for sure.

#3 — May 20, 2005 @ 22:10PM — Matt

RJ--forgive Myopic Zeal for his/her haste in getting this up, sans Amazon link. Sometimes hard news needs to get to the masses, and quick.

#4 — May 20, 2005 @ 22:10PM — RJ [URL]

BTW, good article...

#5 — May 20, 2005 @ 22:11PM — RJ [URL]

Matt...

Can't you admit that bloggers have some power now, and that their efforts might very well end Ms. Foley's career?

#6 — May 20, 2005 @ 22:15PM — Matt

Umm...no, not really...

Frankly, I don't give a shit either way. Never heard of Foley, don't give a fuck if she loses her job over making a dumb comment.

What I do love is watching self-important people give themselves a lot more credit than they are due.

#7 — May 20, 2005 @ 22:23PM — Matt

If you missed it, check out this blogger's review of traffic changes since the last year. Sites like blogcritics are flourishing, while political blogs are losing steam. Big time.

#8 — May 20, 2005 @ 22:24PM — Matt

Let's try that link again

#9 — May 21, 2005 @ 00:57AM — Comment

Its OK to bomb afghanistan WITHOUT evidence.

It is OK to torture people in x-ray and abu gharaib WITHOUT evidence

It is OK to invade Iraq and destroy the country and kill oh 100,000 MORE people WITHOUT ANY EVIDENCE

but it NOT OK to say the obvious as Ms Foley has said :( ...

#10 — May 21, 2005 @ 11:30AM — FPF/HR [URL]


Conc.: Foley's rightful remarks - see Url. - may I say there's nothing new under the sun?

She and we journalistst and correspondents are damn right:

PENTAGON THREATENED EARLIER TO KILL REPORTERS IN IRAQ - Url.:
http://tinyurl.com/7gnsu

"If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, it expects what never was and never will be . . . The People cannot be safe without information.

When the press is free, and every man is able to read, all is safe."

Thomas Jefferson

HR

#11 — May 21, 2005 @ 12:48PM — Dave Nalle [URL]

PPF/HR - if this is the level of intellectual accuity which you and other journalists display then I now fully understand the disreputable state of modern journalism.

I followed the link. The Pentagon did NOT say it was targetting journalists. It warned journalists that if they used devices which issue similar signals to those being used to trigger terrorists bombs then the devices generating the signals might be targeted. In this case some cell phones, pagers and radio phones.

Warning journalists that something they do might put them in danger is NOT threatening them, it's an effort to help keep them safe. Targeting cell phones and pagers is NOT targeting journalists just because they happen to have them.

Twisting the Pentagon's warning this way is really despicable and shows such a blatant bias that if you really are a journalist you ought to be banned from any respectable news outlet.

Dave

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/29863)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments