OPINION

The Structure of Evolutionary Theory: Part 1

Written by Floris Vermeir
Published May 20, 2005

The Structure of Evolutionary Theory by the late Stephen Jay Gould can be seen as a magnum opus describing evolutionary theory from its origins to where it is now, and as well clearly pointing out what the author's opinion is.

In the beginning, there were the naturalists, and then came Charles Darwin. That is about what most of us see at school. We may read books and articles from time to time, but this book offers you the chance to read and experience the knowledge and views of someone far better qualified and documented to write about it than most of us are.

Having not completely read this book as yet, it is fair to say that it's from a rare kind. It consist of all the knowledge acquired over many years, and offers a view in a field of which many have learned only the basics in school, but not the details, and the evolution of that theory from the moment Darwin first formulated it till the moment Stephen Jay Gould wrote the book..

The first part consists of an overview of all the chapters in the book. If one is a professional or a scientist, then those first 100 pages might be enough to know what the book is about. But for most people, like myself, it is necessary and interesting to read the whole book. Every significant theory related to evolution or alternative, is described in the initial chapters. And it is very interesting to read what the comments, critiques, adaptations and discussion of the last 140 years or so were about.

This is not an easy book to read, but it was never intended to be a book meant for the popular market; rather it is a scientific work.

There is the example of the Dutch scientist, who when only studying one species came to a particular conclusion, which turned out to be wrong later on. There are the tales of people who have a particular theory and stick to their guns, even when all evidence points in a different direction—examples of dogmatic Thinking.

It is not only interesting for its subject, but also to read the tales of many men and women, the tales of their intellectual endeavours and how they have changed the way we look at the world. These days we take that for granted, but it hasn't always been like that.

page 1 | 2
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
The Structure of Evolutionary Theory: Part 1
Published: May 20, 2005
Type: Opinion
Section: Books
Writer: Floris Vermeir
Floris Vermeir's BC Writer page
Floris Vermeir's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Floris Vermeir
All Books Articles
All Opinion articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — May 20, 2005 @ 08:38AM — moob

Doesn't anyone proofread their submissions? Magnus oppum???

#2 — May 20, 2005 @ 08:47AM — Shark

Can't wait to read the history of the evolution of phonetic spelling.

=======



PS: re. proofreading --

I used to tell my editor two things:

1) You don't pay me enough to proofreed.

2) I'm not a proofreader; *I'M A HUMAN BEING!



*adapted from "The Elephant Man"

#3 — May 20, 2005 @ 09:24AM — Floris Vermeir [URL]

All spelling mistakes should be corrected, according to the spellingchecker.

#4 — May 20, 2005 @ 10:00AM — Aaman [URL]

Never trust a spell-checker, especially if it's Word.

The phrase in question is 'magnum opus'

#5 — May 21, 2005 @ 02:43AM — Pat Cummings [URL]

I will be going through this post with my editor's comb, since it's in "Books."

I cut Floris a bit more slack, because the posts are both translated from Dutch and deal with deep topics.

#6 — May 21, 2005 @ 03:00AM — DrPat [URL]

Spell-checkers can lead you astray twice: they suggest spellings based on what you have typed, and then they blithely substitute spellings you added to your personal list in a rash moment.

I make it a rule to completely trash my personal list once a year, and begin rebuilding. The lost of time to add a word back in is more than offset by the loss of embarrasing opportunities toe a fool of myself.

(Like the time I added the new Boss's name to the list, only I had spelled it wrong. "You mean he isn't Mr. Dorque?")

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/29790)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments