Blogcritics Comments on Melinda and Melinda

Comment by Bennett

Fri, 20 May 2005 22:22:04 EDT

"I cheered to myself at certain points, and did that "no, don't go in there!" thing at certain other moments." You crack me up Duke.

Comment by Aaron, Duke De Mondo

Fri, 20 May 2005 22:08:43 EDT

quack, another great, articulate review, but one i can't for a second agree with. I've just watched the flick in question, and i'll point out first that woody allen is my favourite director of all ever, and made my favourite flick of all ever (manhattan), so there is the chance i'm slightly biased. but i still know when he's off-form. shadows and fog, for example, looks gorgeous but, alas, is fairly terrible. small time crooks is fun but terribly uneven. this, though, i thouroghly enjoyed from start to finish. despite the disengagement possible through the narrative-skipping antics, i felt truly attached to the whole shebang. I cheered to myself at certain points, and did that "no, don't go in there!" thing at certain other moments. i loved this, really loved it. and i re-watched Anything Else the other night, incidentally, a flick i initially felt dissapointed by. on a second viewing, i loved it. but melinda and melinda is one of his best of the past decade (i think Deconstructing Harry and Celebrity are under-appreciated masterpieces), as far as i'm concerned. i truly loved it.

Comment by sydney

Mon, 16 May 2005 20:06:48 EDT

I agree. I think he's a tad neurotic, like his onscreen counterpart. He's made 36 movies now I believe, one per year for 30 years roughly. Remarkably prolific, and stubborn. He has acted in a handful in that time as well. And he also plays in his jazz band each Monday night. I wish, too, that he would slow it down and collaborate a bit.

Comment by Eric Berlin

Mon, 16 May 2005 19:44:54 EDT

Nicolette -- There's just something so pure and New York about films like Annie Hall... it's hard to describe. I love that movie. I'm a big fan of Crimes and Hannah as well. It's really sad how obvious Allen's decline has been. Maybe he should have been doing fewer movies instead of the constant churn that we seem to see? Occasionally the output is all right, but Woody should be shooting for something higher? Perhaps all the trouble with his persoanl life drove him to work for its own sake? Nice job Quack.

Comment by sydney

Mon, 16 May 2005 19:42:06 EDT

Allen definately has never had reall mass appeal, even with annie hall. However, his influence on film makers round the world is obvious, and there is no American film maker who has captured so many magical moments on film (with the exception, maybe, of Scorcesse). I agree that his movies have slipped recently. However, personally, I watch them and stil enjoy the intelligent dialouge (no matter how relentless and old-hat it may sound), and the cinematography. He still carries off a one liner really well too. Always two or three memerable lines per movie. One thing, I wish he would move towards doing more high dramas like Three sisters, and Another Woman. He seemed such a master at those types of movies and it seems fitting that he would move towards them in his older age since comedy is not ussually the forte of a 65 year old man.

Comment by Nicolette Rivers

Mon, 16 May 2005 17:28:47 EDT

They loved this movie at Soon-Yi's playgroup! Seriously, I've bever been an Allen fan. I have never been impressed by any of his movies, and at this point I don't think it will happen.

Comment by Quack Corleone

Mon, 16 May 2005 17:03:29 EDT

Maybe you're right about the folly of comparing every new Allen movie to his great ones (though I strongly disagree about Allen being America's greatest director), but I think Allen has passed the point of making bad Woody Allen pictures and crossed over into just making bad, or sometimes average, pictures in general. I enjoyed Edward Burns' "Allen-esque" (to put it politely) Sidewalks of New York more than Melinda and Melinda. And that's scary.

Comment by sydney

Mon, 16 May 2005 16:45:16 EDT

I havent seen the movie yet but despite my anticipating bad reviews and a mediocre woody film, I am still anxious to see it. Despite the fact that woody hasnt been "on" since Sweet and Lowdown, HE is still America's greatest director (though, Scorcesse is a close second). Woody's movies are still so packed with aesthetic beauty and intelligence yet we fail to recognize it since we've already seen his best work. No use looking at woody movies in teh context of his career. Try to enjoy each on its own merits. He is a master, and I enjoy seeing all of his movies even if they do pale in comparison to his 70's and 80's gems.